Analysis of Consumers' Perception on Purchase Decisions of Takeaway Coffee Drinks in Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.22146/agritech.55875

Fauzia Adni Alita(1), Dyah Ismoyowati(2*), Wagiman Kastawiyana(3)

(1) Departement of Agro-Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
(2) Departement of Agro-Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
(3) Departement of Agro-Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to determine and analyze the effect of brand image, product, price perception, and preference on purchase decisions of takeaway coffee. The research analyzed variables that most influence purchase decisions of coffee drink takeaway in Yogyakarta and the effect of each independent variable. Data were collected using an online questionnaire from individuals who have purchased takeaway coffee drinks in Yogyakarta more than once. The sample size was 100 respondents, selected using non-probability sampling techniques with the purposive sampling method. The other process was analyzing data by employing a multiple regression approach. The results showed that brand image and product positively affected purchasing decisions with t-count values of 2.340 and 2.715 and significant levels of 0.008 and 0.006, respectively. Price perception reversely influences purchasing decisions, with a t-value of 1.626 and a significance level of 0.107. Preference positively affected purchasing decisions with a t-value of 5.605 and a significance level 0,000. Furthermore, brand image, product, price perception, and preference positively affected purchasing decisions, with an F value of 65.334 and a significance level 0.000. (6) The magnitude of brand image, product, price perception, and perception of takeaway coffee drinks on purchasing decisions (adjusted R 2 ) is 0.504. Considering these results, the regression equation obtained was Y = -0,177 + 0,293X1 + 0,273X2 + 0,320X3 + 5,550D1 + e.


Keywords


Brand image; preference for takeaway coffee; price perception; purchase decisions

Full Text:

PDF


References

Asaoka, S., Abe, T., Komada, Y., Inoue, Y. (2012). The factors associated with preferences for napping and drinking coffee as countermeasures for sleepiness at the wheel among Japanese drivers. Sleep Medicine, 13, 354-361.

Ashari, B.H., Wibawa, B.M., Persada, S.F. (2017). Descriptive analysis and cross-tabulation of online shop consumers on Instagram (case study 6 universities in Surabaya city). Journal of Science and Art ITS, 6(1), 1-5.

Cano-Marquina A., Tarin, J.J., Cano, A. (2013). The impact of coffee on health. Maturitas, 75, 7–21.

Changwichan, K., Gheewala, S. H. (2020). Choice of materials for takeaway beverage cups towards a circular economy. Journal of Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 34 – 44.

Deliana, Yosini., Hapsari, H., Andriani, R., Trimo, L. (2018). Factors that affect consumers' decision in purchasing coffee. Journal of Recent Sciences, 7(1), 1-6.

De Sousa, M. M.M., Carvalho, F. M., Pereira, R. G.F.A. (2020). The Colour and shape of the packaging labels influence consumer expectations and hedonic judgments of specialty coffee. Food Quality and Preference, 83, 1-9.

Gallego-Schmid, A., Mendoza, J. M. F., Azapagic, A. (2019). Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 417- 427.

Ghozali, I. (2012). Multivariate Analysis Application with the IBM SPSS 20. Program. Semarang: UNDIP.

Herlyana, E. (2012). The phenomenon of coffee shops as a new lifestyle for young people. Thaqafiyyat, 13(1), 188-204.

Hidayat, P. (2015). The influence of product quality, price, store atmosphere, and promotion effectiveness on consumer purchase decision of flinders lane espresso Manado. In the Periodical Journal of Scientific Efficiency, 15(5), 1-12.

Indonesian coffee statistics. (2017). Indonesian coffee statistics 2017.

Kotler, P. & Kevin Lane Keller. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Mohamad, S.M., Yusoff, A. R. 2013. Improvement of Takeaway Water Cup Design by Using Concurrent Engineering Approach. Procedia Engineering, 53, 536 – 541.

Park, H., Suh, B. S., Lee, K. (2019). Relationship between daily coffee intake and suicidal ideation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 468-472.

Pertiwi, R. A., Hasyim, H., Nasution, S. K. (2018). Analysis of Factors Affecting Consumers in Consuming Coffee (Coffee) at Starbucks, Killiney, and Ulee Kareng. In the Journal on Social Economics of Agriculture and Agribusiness, 9(10), 1-15.

Petit, C. & Sieffermann, J.M. (2007). Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence? Food Quality and Preference, 18, 161-172.

Rahardjo, P. (2012). Guide to Arabica and Robusta Coffee Cultivation and Processing. Jakarta : Penebar Swadaya.

Samoggia, A., & Riedel, B. (2018). Coffee consumption and purchasing behavior review: Insights for further research. Appetite, 129, 70-81.

Setiadi, N. J. (2013). Consumer Behavior (revised ed.). Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Spence, C., & Carvalho, F. M. (2019). Assessing the influence of the coffee cup on the multisensory tasting experience. Food Quality and Preference, 75, 239-248.

Spence, C., & Carvalho, F. M. (2020). The coffee drinking experience: Product extrinsic (atmospheric) influences on taste and choice. Food Quality and Preference, 80, 1-9.

Tjiptono, F. (2012). Service Management Realizing Prime Service. Yogyakarta : CV Andi Offset.

Tumanan, M. A. R., Lansangan, J. R. G. (2012). More than just a cuppa coffee: A multi-dimensional approach towards analyzing the factors that define place attachment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 529-534.

Ufer, Danielle, Lin, Wen., Ortega, D. L. (2019). Personality traits and preferences for specialty coffee: Results from a coffee shop field experiment. Food Research International, 125, 1-9.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/agritech.55875

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1160 | views : 958

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Fauzia Adni Alita, Dyah Ismoyowati, Wagiman Kastawiyana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

agriTECH has been Indexed by:


agriTECH (print ISSN 0216-0455; online ISSN 2527-3825) is published by Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Gadjah Mada in colaboration with Indonesian Association of Food Technologies.


website statisticsView My Stats