Semiotic Analysis of the Changes of Ondel-ondel Costume Elements as a Betawi Cultural Negotiation

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.64495

Mita Purbasari Wahidiyat(1*), M. Dwi Marianto(2), M. Agus Burhan(3)

(1) Visual Communication Design Department, Bina Nusantara University
(2) Department of Fine Art Department, Indonesian Institute of Arts, Yogyakarta
(3) Department of Fine Art Department, Indonesian Institute of Arts, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Recognized as one of Jakarta’s icons, the large pair of puppets known as ondel-ondel has undergone significant transformation since its origin centuries ago. Classically built in a fairly simple form, ondel-ondel presents itself in various ways at every performance. Now, ondel-ondel is increasingly found throughout Jakarta, having gone through numerous changes in its costume elements. Whereas it is usually meant to be shown as a couple, nowadays a single ondel-ondel can be found cruising alleys with a mere digital sound system as musical accompaniment. Once respected and feared for its looks, today it is belittled by its own people. Due to this phenomenon, this research aimed to answer the questions of who influenced this ideological change, which ruling elite encouraged their ideology, and what the ideology is. Interviews and direct observations produced stories and photographs, while literature and media studies provided a historical background. Roland Barthes’ semiotic connotations with a historical perspective were used to read the hidden concepts behind these signs, which connect the changes of the costume elements through the important events in Betawi society during the period of 1970–2020. The different interests of each party brought more conflict in their relations, which created a dynamic cultural negotiation. Based on the results, the terms for the ondel-ondel models were identified, specifically a personification model, Islamic model, and commercial model, each named after the historical events and ideology brought about by Jakarta’s ruling elites.


Keywords


Ondel-ondel; Costume Elements; Cultural Negotiation Arena; Betawi; Ideologies

Full Text:

PDF


References

Barthes, R. (1983). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.

Danang, M. (2021). Peristiwa Tanjung Priok 1984: Latar Belakang, Tragedi Kerusuhan, dan Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM. Kompaspedia.Kompas.Id. https://kompaspedia.kompas.id/baca/paparan-topik/peristiwa-tanjung-priok-1984-latar-belakang-masalah-tragedi-kerusuhan-dan-penyelesaian-pelanggaran-ham

Erwantoro, H. (2014). Etnis Betawi: Kajian Historis. Patanjala : Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya, 6(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v6i2.179

Flexner, S. B., & Hauck, L. C. (1987). The Random House Dictionary of the English Language. Random House.

Goebel, Z. (2020). Semiotic Landscapes: Scaling Indonesian Multilingualism. Humaniora, 32(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/0.22146/jh.57647

Hauser, A. (1982). The Sociology of Art. The University of Chicago.

Khoiri, A. (2016). “Ngamen” Ondel-Ondel Jadi Daya Tarik Wisata,. CNN Indonesia.

Pratama, A. B. (2014). Isi Fatwa MUI soal Perayaan Natal Bersama Umat Islam. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20141223150504-20-20071/isi-fatwa-mui-soal-perayaan-natal-bersama-umat-islam?

Pratama, R. A. K., Marsyukrilla, E., Ariyanto, G., & TG, J. (2017). Jakarta, 1945 hingga kini. Kompas Media Nusantara. https://arsip-interaktif.kompas.id/gubernur_jakarta

Purbasari, M., Marianto, M. D., & Burhan, M. A. (2016). The Dynamic of Betawi in Colors.pdf. Mudra, 31(3), 384–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v31i3.59

Purbasari, M., Marianto, M. D., & Burhan, M. A. (2019). Ondel-ondel kekinian: boneka besar Betawi di zaman modern. Productum: Jurnal Desain Produk (Pengetahuan Dan Perancangan Produk), 3(6), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.24821/productum.v3i6.2429

Rizal, J. (2019). Ondel-Ondel dan Korupsi. https://sejarahjakarta.com/2019/03/08/ondel-ondel-dan-korupsi/

Samantha, G. (2013). Ondel-ondel Simbol Budaya Jakarta yang Kian Menjadi Usang. http://nationalgeographic.co.id/berita/2013/12/ondel-ondel-simbol-budaya-jakarta-yang-kian-menjadi-usang

Samhudi, H. S. (2020). Ondel-ondel Betawi, Warisan Budaya yang Kini Terlantar. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/301357-ondelondel-betawi-warisan-budaya-yang-kini-telantar-di-jalan

Saputra, Y. A. (2009). Profil Seni Budaya Betawi. Jakarta City Government Tourism and Culture Office.

Shahab, Y. Z. (2001). Rekacipta Tradisi Betawi. Antropologi Indonesia, 66, 18–21.

Storey, J. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. The University of Georgia Press.

Sugiyarto, W. (2010). Dinamika Kehidupan Keagamaan di Era Reformasi (H. A. Ahmad (ed.)). Maloho Jaya Abadi Press.

Sunardi, S. (2013). Semiotika Negativa. Buku Baik.

Supriyanto, & Dharsono. (2017). Bentuk Estetik Ondel-Ondel. Gelar Jurnal Seni Budaya, 15(1), 71–80.

Wahidiyat, M. P. (2019). Ondel-Ondel Sebagai Ruang Negosiasi Kultural Masyarakat Betawi. Indonesia Institute of the Arts, Yogyakarta.

Yakup, A. P. (2019). PENGARUH SEKTOR PARIWISATA TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIA [Airlangga Surabaya]. http://repository.unair.ac.id/86231/1/TE. 05-19 Yak p ABSTRAK.pdf,

Yuwono, U. (2012). Ragam Seni Budaya Betawi. Tim Peneliti Kebudayaan Betawi FIB Universitas Indonesia.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.64495

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1378 | views : 1214

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


ISSN 2302-9269 (online); ISSN 0852-0801 (print)
Creative Commons License Copyright © 2022 Humaniora. This website and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License