Email this article 
The Study of Critical Eco-Linguistic in Green Discourse: Prospective Eco-Linguistic Analysis
https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.27441 Tommi Yuniawan(1*), Fathur Rokhman(2), Rustono Rustono(3), Hari Bakti Mardikantoro(4)
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(4) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Eco-linguistic studies are influenced by one of the other interdisciplinary sciences, namely critical discourse analysis. The combination of these two sciences is called critical eco-linguistic studies. Critical eco-linguistic examines the discourse about the environment and various forms of discourse and their ideology which concerns people and the environment. The environmental discourse with all its manifestations (oral text, written text) is called green discourse. To that end, critical eco-linguistic dictates the linguistic aspects contained in the green discourse. Utilization of lingual units in green discourse will affect the sense and logic of people involved in the discourse, ie the writers and readers or the speakers and the speakers. What is recorded in their cognition, will affect their attitudes and actions to the environment. If green discourse is constructive, then their attitude and actions to the environment are constructive. Conversely, if green discourse is more destructive and exploitative, then their attitudes and actions towards the environment will also be affected towards destruction and exploitation. For this reason, critical eco-linguistic studies in green discourse deserve to be given space as a form of prospective eco-linguistic analysis.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, R. & Stibbe, A. (2011). “From the Analysis of Ecological Discourse the Ecological Analysis of Discourse” in Language Sciences. Amstredam: Elsevier.
Al Gayoni, Y. Usman. (2012). Ekolinguistik. Jakarta: Pang Linge.
Bang, J. C., & Døør, J. (1996). Language and Truth-Dialogue and Dialectics. In Sprachökologie Und Ökolinguistik (pp. 17-26). Stauffenburg Verlag Brigitte Narr GmbH.
Crystal, D. (2011). Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (Vol. 30). John Wiley & Sons.
Eriyanto. (2012). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media [Discourse Analysis: Introudction to Analysis of Text and Media. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Sosial (LKIS).
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992a). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992b). Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995a). Media Discourse. London and New York: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (1995b). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow-Essex: Longman Group Limited.
Fairclough, N. (2000). Critical analysis of media discourse. Media studies: A reader, 2.
Fill, A. & Mühlhäusle, P. (2001). The Eco-linguistic Reader Language, Ecology, and Environment. London: Continuum.
Habermas, J. (2007). Teori Tindakan Komunikatif II: Kritik atas Rasio Fungsionalis. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Haugen, E. (1972). “The Ecology of Language”. in Alwin Fill and Peter Mühlhäusler (ed) The Eco-linguistic Reader Language, Ecology, and Environment. London: Continuum.
Jorgensen, Marianne W, & Louise J, Philips, 2007. Analisis Wacana, Teori & Metode. Penerjemah: Imam Suyitno, et al. [Discourse Analysis, Theory & Methods: Translator: Imam Suyitno, et.al.]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mbete, A. M. (2003). Bahasa dan Budaya Lokal Minoritas: Asal-Muasal, Ancaman Kepunahan, dan Ancangan Pemberdayaan dalam Kerangka Pola Ilmiah Pokok Kebudayaan. Universitas Udayana Bidang Sastra & Budaya, 83.
Mbete, A. M. (2009). Selayang Pandang Tentang Ekolinguistik: Perspektif Kelinguistikan Yang Prospektif. Bahan Untuk Berbagi Pengalaman Kelinguistikan Dalam Matrikulasi Program Magister Linguistik Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana, 12.
Stibbe, A. 2010. “Eco-linguistic and Globalisation”. in Nikolas Coupland (ed) The Blackwell Handbook of Language and Globalisation. London: Blackwell.
Sudibyo, A. (2006). Politik Media dan Pertarungan Wacana [Polictical Media and Discourse Struggle]. Yogyakarta: LkiS.
Titscher, S., Meyer M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179-190.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.27441
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 6815
| 
views : 18498
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 | ISSN 2302-9269 (online); ISSN 0852-0801 (print) |