Self-regulation as Correlates to Students’ Voices and Achievement in TOEFL Score

https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v30i1.26173

Monika Dini Kurniasari(1*)

(1) Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Students’ engagement and persistence in test preparation require their use of self-regulated learning strategies to negate distraction and facilitate good preparation. This research aimed to investigate students’ self-regulation strategies when taking a TOEFL preparation course, by measuring their attitudes towards the course and analyzing the correlation between their pre-test and progress test scores. The data collected comprised self-reported answers from a Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire and the scores of a pre-test and progress test taken by the students during the course. The students were cognizant that hard work affected learning performance, valuing in particular overcoming difficult tasks or continuing to learn even when performance lagged. A strong positive correlation was also found between pre-test and progress test scores (r = 0.8422), indicating high academic performance in the students. These findings emphasize the importance of developing students’ methods of learning and practice. Students should be empowered to become regulated-learners, and should be made more aware of different self-regulated learning strategies to better evaluate, regulate, and improve their own performance.


Keywords


SRL; TOEFL Test; MSLQ

Full Text:

PDF


References

Aliaga, M., & Gunderson, B. (2002). Interactive Statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Cleary, T.J., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulation and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in Schools, 41(5), pp. 537–550.

Jacobson, R.R., & Harris, J.M. (2008). Does the type of campus influence self-regulated learning as measured by MSQL? Education, 128(3), pp. 412–431.

Keyser, J.N., &Viljoen, M.C. (2013). Self-regulated learning as predictor of academic performance. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 13 (3), pp. 87-100.

Lim, P.L., & Kurtin, M. (1984). TOEFL grammar workbook. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.

McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P.R., & Smith, D.AF. (1991). A manual for the use of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Michigan: The University of Michigan.

Marwan, A. (2016). Changing policy of english teaching approach at Indonesian secondary schools. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Juni 2016, Th. XXXV, No. 2, pp. 264-272.

Mbato, C.L. (2013). Facilitating EFL learners’ self-regulation in reading: implementing a metacognitive approach in an Indonesian higher education context. Southern Cross University: ePublications@SCU.

Ministerial Decree No. 159 Year 2014 About the Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum. (Peraturan Menteri nomor 159 Tahun 2014 Tentang Evaluasi Kurikukum 2013)

Pintrich, P.R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students.Educational. Psychology Review, 16(4), pp. 385–407.

Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 33-40.Copyright 1990 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-0663/90/$00.75.

Pintrich, P.R., & Garcia, T. (1994). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr& P.R. Pintrich (eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes, Vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Pintrich, P.R., & Schunck, D.H. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory research and applications.(4th Edition). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Pyle, M.A. (1996). Cliffs Test Prep English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) Preparation. New Delhi: BPB Publications.

Smrtnik, H., & Maya, Z. (2011). Personality traits as a predictor of academic achievement in adolescents. Educational Studies, 37(2), pp. 121–140.

Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), pp. 195–210.

Wolters, C.A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), pp. 189–205.

Zimmerman, B.J. (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), pp. 166–183.

Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student Differences in Self-Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-Efficacy and Strategy Use. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 51-59.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v30i1.26173

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 760 | views : 585

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Humaniora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 2302-9269 (Online)


web counter View My Stats