Microscopic Observation of Solid-Liquid Reaction: A Novel Laboratory Approach to Teaching Rate of Reaction

Agus Setiabudi; Asep Wahyudin; Galuh Yuliani; Mauro Mocerino

doi:10.22146/ijc.23642

Microscopic Observation of Solid-Liquid Reaction: A Novel Laboratory Approach to Teaching Rate of Reaction

https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.23642

Agus Setiabudi^(1*), Asep Wahyudin⁽²⁾, Galuh Yuliani⁽³⁾, Mauro Mocerino⁽⁴⁾

(1) Departement of Chemistry, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung 40154
(2) Departement of Chemistry, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung 40154
(3) Departement of Chemistry, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung 40154
(4) Department of Chemistry, Curtin University, PO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The importance of observation in science and science education has triggered this laboratory development study that investigated the value of an observation kit as a new approach to teaching rate of reaction in general chemistry class. The kit consists of a digital microscope, a “chemical reactor”, and a tailor-made computer application and was used to video-record a solid-liquid reaction and to produce a series of two dimensional solid images that indicate the extent of reaction. The two dimensional image areas were calculated by the computer application and using the assumption that the image area was directly proportional to the mass of the solid, a plot of solid mass versus time could be obtained. These steps have been tested in several solid-liquid reaction systems, with the reaction of solid magnesium oxide with nitric acid solution resulting in the best images which were transferable to rate of reaction data, i.e. a plot of solid MgO mass as a function of time. The plot can be used to explain rate of reaction concepts including average, instantaneous, and initial rate. Furthermore, the effect of concentration on reaction rate could also be explained. This study showed that the observation kit and the generated data set have the advantage of allowing students to clearly and repeatedly visualise a solid-liquid reaction and relate this with the concept of rates of reactions. The observation kit also allows teachers and students to extend its application into inquiry based experiments.

Keywords

microscopic observation; solid liquid reaction; rate of reaction; inquiry learning

Full Text:

Full Text Pdf

References

[1] Fang, X.S., Ye, C.H., Zhang, L.D., Zhang, J.X., Zhao, J.W., and Yan, P., 2005, Direct observation of the growth process of MgO nanoflowers by a simple chemical route, Small, 1 (4), 422–428.

[2] Setiabudi, A., Allaart, N.K., Makkee, M., and Moulijn, J.A., 2005, In situ visible microscopic study of molten Cs₂SO₄·V₂O₅–soot system: Physical interaction, oxidation rate, and data evaluation, Appl. Catal., B, 60 (3-4), 233–243.

[3] Novo, C., Funston, A.M., and Mulvaney, P., 2008, Direct observation of chemical reactions on single gold nanocrystals using surface plasmon spectroscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol., 3 (10), 598–602.

[4] Lema, M.A., Aljinovic, E.M., and Lozano, M.E., 2002, Using a homemade spectrophotometer in teaching biosciences, Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 30 (2), 106–110.

[5] Quagliano, J.M., and Marks, C.A., 2013, Demystifying spectroscopy with secondary students: Designing and using a custom-built spectrometer, J. Chem. Educ., 90 (10), 1409–1410.

[6] Aung, T., and Liberko, C.A., 2014, Bringing photochemistry to the masses: A simple, effective, and inexpensive photoreactor, right out of the box, J. Chem. Educ., 91 (6), 939–942.

[7] Hamad, M.L., 2013, Measuring tablet dissolution: An experiment for teaching quantitative ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy, J. Chem. Educ., 90 (12), 1662–1664.

[8] Cloonan, C.A., Nichol, C.A., and Hutchinson, J.S., 2011, Understanding chemical reaction kinetics and equilibrium with interlocking building blocks, J. Chem. Educ., 88 (10), 1400–1403.

[9] Fenk, C.J., and Kaufman, N., 2007, A new colorimetric assay of tabletop sweeteners using a modified biuret reagent, 84 (10), 1676–1678.

[10] Marvel, S.C., and Kepler, M.V., 2015, A simple membrane osmometer system & experiments that quantitatively measure osmotic pressure, Am. Biol. Teach., 71 (6), 355–362.

[11] Setiabudi, A., Yuliani, G., and Pawitan, Z., 2016, An oxygen sensor using zinc-air electrochemical cells: A simple device to demonstrate applied technology in electrochemistry teaching, Sch. Sci. Rev., 97 (361), 30–34.

[12] Chittleborough, G., and Treagust, D.F., 2007, The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 8, 274–292.

[13] Gilbert, J.K., 2010, The role of visual representations in the learning and teaching of science: An introduction, Asia-Pac. Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., 11 (1), 1–19.

[14] American Chemical Society, 2012, ACS Guidelines and Recommendations for the Teaching of High School Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Society Committee on Education, Washington, DC 20036.

[15] Kluge, A., 2015, Combining laboratory experiments with digital tools to do scientific inquiry, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 36 (13), 2157–2179.

[16] Guzey, S.S., and Roehrig, G.H., 2009, Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge, Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ., 9 (1), 25–45.

[17] Barrie, S.C., Buntine, M.A., Jamie, M., and Kable, S.H., 2001, APCELL : The Australian physical chemistry enhanced laboratory learning project, Aust. J. Educ. Chem., 57, 6–12.

[18] Lim, K.F., 2004, An IR investigation of the CO dipole direction and other properties: An APCELL experiment, Aust. J. Educ. Chem., 64, 24–28.

[19] Blonder, R., Mamlock-Naaman, R., and Hofstein, A., 2008, Analyzing inquiry questions of high-school students in a gas chromatography open-ended laboratory experiment, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9 (3), 250–258.

[20] Smith, C.J., 2012, Improving the school-to-university transition: Using a problem-based approach to teach practical skills whilst simultaneously developing students’ independent study skills, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13 (4), 490–499.

[21] Hofstein, A., and Mamlok-Naaman, R., 2007, The laboratory in science education: The state of the art, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 8 (2), 105–107.

[22] Hunnicutt, S.S., Grushow, A., and Whitnell, R., 2015, Guided-inquiry experiments for physical chemistry: The POGIL-PCL model, J. Chem. Educ., 92 (2), 262–268.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.23642