The Effect of Various Decomposers on Quality of Cattle Dung Compost

Nur Shoodiq Alfadlli; Safuan Noor; Bayu Setya Hertanto; Muhammad Cahyadi

doi:10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i3.25865

The Effect of Various Decomposers on Quality of Cattle Dung Compost

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i3.25865

Nur Shoodiq Alfadlli⁽¹⁾, Safuan Noor⁽²⁾, Bayu Setya Hertanto⁽³⁾, Muhammad Cahyadi^(4*)

(1) PT. Persada Pupuk Indonesia, Subang, Purwakarta, 41118, Indonesia
(2) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
(3) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
(4) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the utilization of decomposer from bioethanol waste (DLB) with various commercial decomposers on quality of compost made from cattle dung. This study used completely randomized design (one-way ANOVA) with four treatments and five replications. Materials used in this study were cattle dung, water, molasses, DLB and various commercial decomposers (A, B, and C). The treatments in this study were cattle dung + BLB 0.5% (P0), cattle dung + decomposer A 0.5% (P1), cattle dung + decomposer B 0.5% (P2) and cattle dung + decomposer C 0.5% (P3). Then, the mixtures were aerobically ripened until four weeks. During composting, compost was stirred weekly. Furthermore, mature compost was analyzed to evaluate the amount of C Organic, total N, total P, total K, total Ca, total Mg, C/N ratio and pH value. The analysis of variance showed that there was no difference of the quality and pH value of compost made from cattle dung with utilization of DLB and commercial decomposers. It could be concluded that utilization of DLB in composting of cattle dung had identically quality and pH value of compost with utilization of commercial decomposers, therefore, this technology could be an alternative to process waste from home industry of bioethanol.

Keywords

Bioethanol waste; Cattle dung; Compost quality; Decomposers

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adegunloye, D. V., F. C. Adetuyi, F. A. Akinosoye and M. O. Doyeni. 2007. Microbial analysis of compost using cow dung as booster. Pakistan J. Nut. 6: 506-510.

Ariyanto, J., D. Harjunowibowo, dan M. Cahyadi. 2014. Pengolahan limbah bioetanol sebagai upaya pelestarian alam. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika (SNFPF) ke-5, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia pp. 222 – 227.

Bahar, S. dan B. Haryanto. 2000. Pembuatan kompos berbahan baku limbah ternak. Laporan Bagian Proyek Teknologi Peternakan ARMP-II: 200-202.

Bernal, M. P., J. A. Alburquerque and R. Moral. 2009. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 5444-5453.

Barber, S. A. 1995. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach. John Willey and Son Inc, New York.

Chandna, P., L. Nain, S. Singh and R. C. Kuhad. 2013. Assessment of bacterial diversity during composting of agricultural by products. BMC Microbiol. 13: 99.

Eghball, B., B. J. Wienhold, J. E. Gilley and R. A. Eigenberg. 2002. Mineralization of manure nutrients. J. Soil Water Conserv. 57: 470-473.

Hadi, R. F., D. Harjunowibowo, I. T. Suwarto, dan M. Cahyadi. 2016. Pemanfaatan limbah bioetanol sebagai tambahan bahan pakan konsentrat terhadap performa domba ekor gemuk. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peternakan Berkelanjutan 7, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, Indonesia pp. 164 – 170.

Hao, X., C. Chang and F. J. Larney. 2004. Carbon, nitrogen balances and greenhouse gas emission during cattle feedlot manure composting. J. Environ. Qual. 33: 37-44.

Hashim, A. B., H. Aminuddin and K. B. Siva. 1996. Nutrient content in rice husk ash of some Malaysian rice varieties. Pert. J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 19: 77-80.

Iglesias-Jimenez, E., P. V. Garcia, M. Espino and J. M. Hernadez. 1993. City refuse compost as a phosphorus source to overcome the P-fixation capacity of sesquioxide-rich soils. Plant and Soil. 148: 115-127.

Isa, M., dan Kusmiati. 2013. Model Daya Saing Industri Bioetanol. JEP: KMEP. 14: 214-222.

Ishii, K., M. Fukui and S. Takii. 2000. Microbial succession during a composting process as evaluated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89: 768-777.

Khan, M. A. I., K. Ueno, S. Horimoto, F. Komai, K. Tanaka and Y. Ono. 2009. Physicochemical, including spectroscopic and biological analyses during composting of green tea waste and rice bran. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 45: 305-313.

Kusmiyarti, T. B. 2013. Kualitas kompos dari berbagai kombinasi bahan baku limbah organik. Jurnal Agrotop. 3: 83-92.

Martin, R. C., D. H. Lynch, B. Frick and P. van Straaten. 2007. Perspective Phosphorus status on Canadian organic farms. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87: 2737-2740.

Moertinah, S. 2010. Kajian proses anaerobik sebagai alternatif teknologi. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Pencegahan dan Pencemaran Industri 1: 104-114.

Nurcahyani, K. dan B. Utami. 2015. Pengolahan limbah cair industri alkohol bekonang menggunakan proses fermentasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Konservasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam, UNS, surakarta, Indonesia pp 112 – 116.

Sadik, M. W., H. M. El Shaer and H. M. Yakot. 2010. Recycling of agriculture and animal wastes into compost using compost activator in Saudi Arabia. J. Int. Environ. Appl. Sci. 5: 397-403.
Sager, M. 2007. Trace and nutrient elements in manure, dung and compost samples in Austria. Soil Biol. Bioch. 39: 1383–1390.

Sánchez-Monedero, M. A., A. Roig, C. Paredes and M. P. Bernal. 2001. Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and its effects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures. Bioresour. Technol. 78: 301-308.

Sariubang M., A. Ella, A. Nurhayu dan D. Pasambe. 2002. Kajian integrasi usahaternak sapi potong dalam sistem usaha pertanian di Sulawesi Selatan. Wartazoa 12: 24-28.

Sembiring, M. P. dan R. S. Irianty. 2012. Pembuatan kompos dari limbah padat (sludge) pabrik pulp dan paper. Jurnal Riset Kimia 5: 132-136.

Shrestha, K., P. Shrestha, K. B. Walsh, K. M. Harrower and D. J. Midmore. 2011. Microbial enhancement of compost extracts based on cattle rumen content compost – characterization of a system Bioresour. Technol. 102: 8027-8034.

Six, J., K. Paustian, E. T. Elliott and C. Combrink. 2000. Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64: 681-689.

Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI). 2004. Spesifikasi Kompos dari Sampah Organik Domestik. Badan Standarisasi Nasional, Jakarta Pusat.

Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1993. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika (Pendekatan Biometrik). Penerjemah B. Sumantri. Gramedia Pustaka Umum, Jakarta.

Suhesy, S. dan Adriani. 2014. Pengaruh probiotik dan trichoderma tarhadap hara pupuk kandang yang berasal dari feses sapi dan kambing. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Peternakan 17: 45-53.

Tan, K. H. 1996. Soil Sampling, Preparation and Analysis. Marcell Dekker. Inc, New York.

Trivana, L., A. Y. Pradhana, dan A. P. Manambangtua. 2017. Optimalisasi Waktu Pengomposan Pupuk Kandang dari Kotoran Kambing dan Debu Sabut Kelapa dengan Bioaktivator EM4. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Lingkungan 9: 16-24.

Wong, J. W. C., K. K. Ma, K. M. Fang and C. Cheung. 1999. Utilization of a manure compost for organic farming in Hongkong. Bioresour. Technol. 67: 43-46.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i3.25865