Issue

Vol 16 No 2 (2022): September

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Discretion and Interpretation of Indonesian Social Forestry (ISF) by Local Forest Bureaucrats: Evidence from DI Yogyakarta Province

https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v16i2.2409
Dwiko Budi Permadi
dbpermadi@ugm.ac.id
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Hajar Lutviah
Wanagama Teaching Forest, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
Teguh Yuwono
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Rohman
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Corresponding Author(s) : Dwiko Budi Permadi

dbpermadi@ugm.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, Vol 16 No 2 (2022): September

Abstract

Policies on social forestry would be effective when translated into operation by lower forestry bureaucrats. This research aimed to analyze the discretion and interpretation of local forest bureaucrats on Indonesian social forestry policies. This research applied a documentary study, with data collected from policy documents issued by the Provincial Government of DI Yogyakarta and interview materials of 14 source persons from the Local Forest Bureaucrats (LFB) and farmer groups. The results showed that the DI Yogyakarta Provincial Government had produced numerous policy instruments to regulate the mechanism and profit-sharing of social forestry schemes within the Yogyakarta Forest Management Unit (FMU). The discretions proved the bureaucrats prefer forestry partnership cooperation to the licensing schemes. They also preferred utilizing environmental services for nature tourism to timber forest products due to the complexity and complicated harvesting procedures. These preferences were motivated by their views that increasing provincial government revenue and local beneficiaries from the forests were more achievable through partnership schemes and nature tourism. This research indicated a delay in the social forestry implementation through a licensing scheme. However, the creative discretion of the local forest bureaucrats could accelerate the implementation of forestry partnership cooperation schemes.

Keywords

street-level bureaucracy forest management unit forestry partnerships community forestry ecotourism timber harvesting
Permadi, D. B., Lutviah, H., Yuwono, T., & Rohman. (2022). Discretion and Interpretation of Indonesian Social Forestry (ISF) by Local Forest Bureaucrats: Evidence from DI Yogyakarta Province. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 16(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v16i2.2409
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan (BPSKL) (2019). Laporan Kinerja Balai PSKL Jawa Bali Nusa Tenggara Tahun Anggaran 2018. Bali: Pesona.
  2. Djauhari M. (2017). Hutan Kemasyarakatan. KpSHK: Bogor.
  3. Hardianti AL, Permadi DB, and Rohman. (2020). Configuration of resource access explaining the performance of community forest farmer groups in Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. Proceedings Number 449. The 3rd International Conference in Agroforestry (ICAF) "Adopting Modern Agroforestry Toward Smart Social Forestry Program", 16-17 October 2019, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  4. Handayani SR, Laraswati, D Pratama, AA, Permadi, DB, Sahide, MAK, Maryudi, A (2020) Research trend: Hidden diamonds–The values and risks of online repository documents for forest policy and governance analysis Forest policy and economics, Vol. 100, p. 254-257.
  5. Hill, M J and Hupe, P L (2009) Implementing Public Policy. An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance, 2nd ed, London: Sage Publications
  6. BPK RI (2021) Database Peraturan RI. BPK.
  7. Kholifah E (2013) Pemikiran Kritis Tentang Bureaucrat Street Level Theory Oleh Michael Lipsky. Tersedia dari Relasi Jurnal Ekonomi - Mandala Jember.
  8. Kubo H (2010) Understanding discretionary decision making of frontline bureaucrats in state forestland management: A case from Java, Indonesia Society & Natural Resources 23 (3): 240-253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802050298
  9. Kuncoro M, Suyatna H, dan Sadono R (2018) Dampak Perhutanan Sosial: Perspektif Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Lingkungan. Indonesia: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
  10. Lutviah, H (2020) Persepsi Birokrat Kehutanan Tingkat Tapak Terhadap Implementasi Kebijakan HKm di Kabupaten Gunungkidul. [Unpublished Skripsi]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  11. Maryudi A, Devkota RR, Schusser C, Yufanti CS, Aurenhammer H, Rotchanaphatharawit R, Krott M (2012) Back to Basics: Considerations in Evaluating The Outcomes of Community Forestry. ELSEVIER: Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.017.
  12. Mas’oed, M (2003) Ekonomi -Politik Internasional dan Pembangunan (edisi 2). Indonesia: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar Yogyakarta.
  13. Mulyadin MR, Surati and Kuncoro A (2016) Kajian Hutan Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Sumber Pendapatan: Kasus Di Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol. 13 No. 1 April 2016, Hal. 13-23. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2016.13.1.13-23
  14. Nugroho P, Wiyono, Al Hafi NA (2021). Menghadirkan Manfaat Hutan Negara: Pelajaran dari Kemitraan Pengembangan Wisata Berbasis Alam di KPH Yogyakarta. Jurnal Sylva Lestari Vo 9(2): 239-251. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl29239-251%
  15. Oktalina SN, Wiyono, Hidayat R. (2017) Peran Hutan Rakyat dalam Mendukung Penghidupan Petani di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Terapan SV UGM. Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  16. Ota M (2019). “Focusing on Forest Administration Systems in Analyzing Joint Forest Management: A Case Study of PHBM in Java, Indonesia” in International Conference on Technology for Sustainable Development. pages 162–169. DOI 10.18502/kss.v3i23.5146.
  17. Direktorat Penyiapan Kawasan Perhutanan Sosial (PKPS). (2021). Rencana Kerja Lingkup Ditjen PSKL Tahun 2021. PKPS.
  18. Salaka FJ, Alviya I, Suryandari ER, Nurfatriani F, dan Muttaqin MZ (2019). Efektivitas Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Hutan Tanaman Rakyat di Tingkat Lokal. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan Vol. 17 No.1, pp.: 75-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2019.17.1.75-92.
  19. Simamora J (2010). Efektivitas Penggunaan Diskresi Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Jurnal Visi. 18(1):88-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v18i2
  20. Subarsono AG (2011). Kebijakan Publik: Konsep, Teori, dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  21. Sulistyowati AS (2013). Analisis Hambatan Kebijakan Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm). [Skripsi]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  22. Sulastiyo D, Kartodihardjo H, dan Soedomo S (2016). Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Rehabilitasi Dan Reklamasi Hutan. Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika Vol. 07 No. 3, Hal 181-187, Issn: 2086-8227. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jsilvik/article/view/14715.
  23. The Partnership for Governance Reform. (2011). Mendorong Percepatan Program Hutan Kemasyarakatan dan Hutan Desa. Yogyakarta.
  24. Trusty T, Cerveny LK (2012). The Role of Discretion in Recreation Decision-Making By Resource Professionals in The USDA Forest Service. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 107, 114. https://doi:l0.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.021
Read More

Author Biographies

Dwiko Budi Permadi, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Teguh Yuwono, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Rohman, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 215 Download : 199