Communal Sharing as the Foundation of Solidarity Action in Youth Organization

Melani Jayanti, Wenty Marina Minza, F A Nurdiyanto
(Submitted 5 January 2023)
(Published 30 April 2024)


Solidarity is a theme frequently discussed to explain social phenomena linked to social concerns and cohesion. It is also a commonly discussed topic in news and research works, especially during crises. Studies about solidarity have elaborated on forms of solidarity action, but only a few discuss the process of solidarity and the dynamics of intragroup relationships. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the patterns and roles of intragroup relationships in the solidarity actions of youth organizations, using a qualitative case study approach. The study involved seven young people (4 men, 3 women) from the Kanal Muda Community, with the consideration of the representativeness of the group’s elements. The data analysis method employed was thematic analysis, considering Fiske’s lens in building the logic of the findings in social relationships. This study found that the communal sharing relationship is the main foundation of solidarity action and enables equal relationships and cooperation within the community. This study attempts to contribute to the literature on the intragroup relationship and its relevance in solidarity action. Communal sharing can also influence the formation of values, norms, working methods, and decision-making in the group.


communal sharing; relasi intragroup; kesetaraan; kerja sama; solidaritas

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.80984


Batson, C. D. (1994). Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 603–610.

Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., … Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), Article 5.

Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S., & Trochim, W. M. (2011). Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict. Small Group Research, 42(2), 127–176.

Bierhoff, H. W., & Küpper, B. (1999). Social Psychology of Solidarity. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Solidarity (pp. 133–156). Springer Netherlands.

Biorcio, R., & Vitale, T. (2016). Italia civile: Associazionismo, partecipazione e politica. Donzelli editore.

Boer, N.-I., van Baalen, P. J., & Kumar, K. (2004). The Implications of Different Models of Social Relations for Understanding Knowledge Sharing. In H. Tsoukas & N. Mylonopoulos (Eds.), Organizations as Knowledge Systems (pp. 130–153). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cappelen, A. W., Falch, R., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2021). Solidarity and fairness in times of crisis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 186, 1–11.

Clark, M. S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 549–557.

Cuzzocrea, V., & Collins, R. (2015). Collaborative Individualization? Peer-to-peer Action in Youth Transitions. YOUNG, 23(2), 136–153.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

De Luigi, N., Martelli, A., & Pitti, I. (2018). New Forms of Solidarity and Young People: An Ethnography of Youth Participation in Italy. In S. Pickard & J. Bessant (Eds.), Young People Re-Generating Politics in Times of Crises (pp. 253–271). Springer International Publishing.

de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390.

Durkheim, É. (1947). The Division of Labour in Society. The Free Press.

Federico, V. (2020). Talking about solidarity . . . it sounds like a whisper: Solidarity in law and public policies. In Citizens’ Solidarity in Europe (pp. 101–119). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, A. P., & Lindenberg, S. (2006). Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives. Springer Science & Business Media.

Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723.

Flache, A. (2002). The rational weakness of strong ties: Failure of group solidarity in a highly cohesive group of rational agents. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 26(3), 189–216.

Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. (2020). Tentang Kanal Muda. Kanal Muda - Mengalirkan Kehidupan.

Kerwin, S., Doherty, A., & Harman, A. (2011). “It’s Not Conflict, It’s Differences of Opinion”: An In-Depth Examination of Conflict in Nonprofit Boards. Small Group Research, 42(5), 562–594.

Koentjaraningrat, K. (1977). Sistem Gotong Royong dan Jiwa gotong Royong. Antropologi Indonesia, 4–16.

Kolers, A. H. (2012). Dynamics of Solidarity. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(4), 365–383.

Komter, A. E. (2005). Social Solidarity and the Gift. Cambridge University Press.

Laitinen, A., & Pessi, A. B. (2014). Solidarity: Theory and Practice. Lexington Books.

Lin, T.-C., Wu, S., & Lu, C.-T. (2012). Exploring the affect factors of knowledge sharing behavior: The relations model theory perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 751–764.

Lindenberg, S. (2014). Solidarity: Unpacking the Social Brain. In Solidarity: Theory and Practice (pp. 30–54). Lexington Books.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1984). Etika Jawa. Sebuah Analisa Falsafi tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa. Penerbit PT Gramedia.

Minza, W. M., Faturochman, F., Muhiddin, S., & Anggoro, W. J. (2022). Adaptasi individual dan kolektif: Respons masyarakat Indonesia menghadapi pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 20(1), 1–15.

Nadler, A. (2020). Social Psychology of Helping Relations: Solidarity and Hierarchy. John Wiley & Sons.

Pope, W., & Johnson, B. D. (1983). Inside Organic Solidarity. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 681–692.

Prainsack, B. (2020). Solidarity in Times of Pandemics: Democratic Theory, 7(2), 124–133.

Singer, P. (2017). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. In Applied Ethics (pp. 132–142). Routledge.

Stern, P. C. (1986). Toward a social psychology of solidarity. American Psychologist, 41(2), 229–231.

Sujito, A. (2020). Kerentanan, Solidaritas Sosial dan Masyarakat Tangguh. In New Normal: Perubahan Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik Akibat Covid-19 (1st ed., pp. 253–265). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Verweij, M. (2015). How (Not) to Argue for the Rule of Rescue. Claims of Individuals Versus Group Solidarity. In G. Glen, D. Norman, & E. Nir (Eds.), Identified versus Statistical Victims. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. (pp. 137–149). Oxford University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.