The Fourth Dimensions of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model of Work Engagement in Indonesian Context

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.56682

Avin Fadilla Helmi(1*), Wahyu Widhiarso(2), Ramadhan Dwi Marvianto(3), Acintya Ratna Priwati(4), Muhammad Ahmad Mustari(5), Yasinta Vania Artikasari(6)

(1) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(5) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(6) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified version of the Work Engagement Scale in the Indonesian context, by adding one aspect and test the effect of types of occupation using the multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model for testing measurement invariance. The sample of this study included 459 workers in Indonesia using 16 items of the Work Engagement Scale. The results revealed that Indonesian respondents have Asian characteristics, but they come from various ethnicities and cultures. By including university lecturers and industrial workers as respondents and performing confirmatory factor analysis followed by MIMIC model, it is discovered that Indonesian employees have satisfactory psychometric properties in all four dimensions, which comprise the constructs of the work engagement scale. The findings provide an insight into in the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model of work engagement in Indonesian context consisted of vigor, dedication, absorption, and contribution dimensions from theoretical understanding. MIMIC model gives an evidence that the occupation types can affect the factor structure of work engagement, indicating that measurement invariance are not hold.


Keywords


confirmatory factor analysis, indonesian context, mimic models, psychometrics, work engagement scale

Full Text:

PDF


References

Agarwal, U., A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41-73. doi: 10.1108/PR-02-2012-0019

Andayani, T. R. (2016). Pengembangan konsep dan kualitas pertemanan, serta pengukuran. (Unpublished Disserta­tion). Faculty of Psychology Univer­sitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2010). Kewarga­negaraan, suku bangsa, agama, dan bahasa sehari-hari penduduk Indonesia, Hasil sensus penduduk 2010. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engage­ment. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476

Bakker, A. B, & Leiter, M. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.

Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance struc­tures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Cahyaningtyas, L. A. D., & Helmi, A. F. (2018). Role of self-leadership on employee’ attitude in Pertamina training and consultation. (Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis). Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Endres, G. M., & Mancheno-Smoak, L. (2008). The human resource craze: Human performance improvement and employee engagement. Organiza­tion Development Journal, 26(1), 69-78. doi: 10.1108/sd.2008.05624had.007

Falkoski, J. (2012). Burnout, employee engagement, and coping in high-risk occupations. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organisational Culture, 2(4), doi: 10.1002/jpoc.20085

Fong, T. C. & Ng, S. (2012). Measuring engagement at work: Validation of the Chinese version of Utrecht Work Engagement scale. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19(3), 391-397. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6

Furr, M. R., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics: an introduction (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Gallup. (2013). State of the global workplace: employee engagement insight for business leaders worldwide. https://www.gallup.com/services/178517/state-global-workplace.aspx

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of engage­ment and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work & Stress, 22(3), 242-256. doi: 10.1080/02678370802383962

Hayuningtyas, D. R. I., & Helmi, A. F. (2015). Peran kepemimpinan otentik terhadap work engagement dosen dengan efikasi diri sebagai mediator. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology, 1(3), 167-179. doi: 10.22146/gamajop.8814

Heine, S. J., Markus, H. R., Lehman, D. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a uni­versal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.106.4.766

Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organization: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure model­ing: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424

Hwang, K.-K. (2000). Chinese relationa­lism: theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 155–178. doi: 10.1111/1468-5914.00124

Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Constructive realism and confucian relationalism: An epistemological strategy for the devel­opment of indigenous psychology. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psycho­logy: Understanding people in context (pp. 73–107). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

Joreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(351), 631-639. doi: 10.2307/2285946

Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York: Springer Science + Business Media. doi: 10.1007/0-387-28662-4

Kulikowski, K. (2017a). Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool – A literature review. International Journal of Occupa­tional Medicine and Environmental Health, 30(2),161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947

Kulikowski, K. (2017b). One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) on a sample of Polish employees. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1-9. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958

Liu, C. M. (2001). The development of an integrated model of work motivation: A bottomup inquiry process. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 43, 189-206.

Maden, C. (2015). Linking high involve­ment human resource practices to employee proactivity: the role of work engagement and learning goal orien­tation. Personnel Review, 44(5), 720-738, doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2014-0030

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. Jossey-Bass.

Maslach, C., Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engage­ment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498-512. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37. doi: 10.1348/096317904322915892

Meng, L., & Jin, Y. (2017). Nurse Education Today A con fi rmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students in a Chinese sample. Nurse Education Today, 49, 129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.017

Mustari, M., A. & Helmi, A., F. (2018). Contribution is the fourth dimension of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) and it is a complement of the first three dimensions: vigor, dedication, and absorp­tion. (Unpublished Thesis). Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Nerstad, C. G. L., Richardsen, A. M. & Martinussen, M. (2010). Factorial vali­dity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 326-333. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00770

Nindhita, V., & Helmi, A., F. (2018). Work engagements exploration on judges. (Unpublished Thesis). Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Petrović I. B., Vukelic M., Čizmić S. (2017) Work engagement in Serbia: Psycho­metric properties of the Serbian ver­sion of the Utrecht Work Engage­ment Scale (UWES). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799

Reijseger, G., Peeters, M. C. W., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). From motivation to activation: Why engaged workers are better performers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 117-130. doi: 10.1007/s10869-016-9435-z

Römer, J. (2016). The Korean Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student (UWES-S): A factor validation study. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 23(1), 65-81. doi: 10.4473/TPM23.1.5

Rongen, A., Robroek, S., Schaufeli, W. B., & Burdorf, A. (2014). The contribution of work engagement to self-perceived health, work ability, and sickness absence beyond health behaviors and work-related factors. Journal of Occupa­tional and Environmental Medicine, 56(8), 892-897. doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000196

Saunders, L., & Tiwari, D. (2014). Employee engagement and disengage­ment: Causes and benefits. The International Journal Of Business & Management, 2(5), 44-52.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(3), 71-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1015630930326

Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale preliminary manual. Utrecht: Occupational Health Psycho­logy Unit Utrecht University.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a shor questionnaire, A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471

Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 173-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00285.x

Shahrazad, W., Sulaiman, W., & Zahoni, N. A. (2016). Validation of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) in the Malaysian Context. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(9). doi: 10.18178/ijssh.2016.6.9.730

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kubota, K., & Kawakami, N. (2012). Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions? Industrial Health, 50(4), 316-321. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1355

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kosugi, S., Suzuki, A., Nashiwa, H., Kato, A., Sakamoto, M., Irimajiri, H., Amano, S., Hirohata, K., & Goto, R. (2008). Work engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(3), 510–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00333.x

Sinval, J., Pasian, S., Queirós, C., Marôco, J. (2018). Brazil-Portugal transcultural adaptation of the UWES-9: Internal Consistency, dimensionality, and mea­surement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00353

Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518-528. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518

Spreitzer, G. (1995). Psychological em­power­ment in the workplace: Dimen­sions, measurement, and validation. Journal of Advertising, 38(5), 1442-1465. doi: 10.5465/256865

Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satis­faction, and strain. Journal of Manage­ment, 23(5), 679–704. doi: 10.1177/014920639702300504

Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.009

Suparmi. (2017). Konsep dan model kemandirian anak dengan down syndrome. (Unpublished Dissertation). Faculty of Psychology Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. a. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. doi: 10.2307/258687

Towers Perrin (2003). Working today: Understanding what drives employee engagement. Towers Perrin HR Services.

Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: understanding diversity in global business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Vokić, N. P., & Hernaus, T. (2015). The triad of job satisfaction, work engagement, and employee loyalty - The interplay among the concepts [EFZG Working Paper Series]. Faculty of Economics and Business University of Zagreb.

WorldBank. (2019). Population, total – Indonesia. Retrieved from official website of WorldBank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=ID



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.56682

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 8931 | views : 10307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Recent Issues

Buku 1 Buku 1 Buku 1 Buku 1 
Vol 51 Issue 1 (2024)
Page 1-119		 Vol 50 Issue 3 (2023)
Page 219-332		 Vol 50 Issue 2 (2023)
Page 125-218		 Vol 50 Issue 1 (2023)
Page 1-124		 

 

 

Published by Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Building D-6th, Floor No. D-606. Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55281
Email: jurnalpsikologi@ugm.ac.id
Phone/whatsApp: +6281125210175

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View My Stats