Should I Trust Social Media? How Media Credibility and Language Affect False Memory
Dewi Maulina(1*), Ishaq Mahmudil Hakim(2), Ladayna Nurul Arasy(3), Marsa Dhiya Millatina(4), Ermanda Saskia Siregar(5)
(1) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia
(5) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examined the influence of credibility and .language in Internet-based media on false memory. A randomized factorial 2 (media credibility) × 2 (language) experimental design was conducted with 106 college students. The two groups of media credibility consisted of social media (LINE) and non-social media (detik.com), while media language consisted of formal and informal language. A confidence test was used to measure false memory. A two-factor ANOVA showed that media credibility significantly affects false memory. Participants in the detik.com group were more confident in the information received and had greater false memory than the LINE group. However, no significant effect of language was found, and no significant interaction effect between media credibility and language on false memory was found. This study suggests that individuals should be cautious when reading information on non-social media platforms, as individuals tend to place more confidence on the source, leading to greater false memory.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amalia, E. I. (2016). Jumlah pengguna line di indonesia terbanyak keempat di dunia]. Retrieved from: www.mediaindonesia.com/news/read/64899 on March 12 2017.
Asosiasi Penyedia Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). (2014). Profil pengguna internet Indonesia 2014. Jakarta: Puskakom UI.
Bohang, K. (2016). Di indonesia, jumlah pengguna line pepet Facebook. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/iXMmxd on March 12 2017.
Bosscher, R. J., & Smit, J. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 339–343. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00025-4
Calvillo, D. P. (2014). Individual differences in susceptibility to misinformation effects and hindsight bias. The Journal of General Psychology, 141(4), 393–407. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.954917
Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 770–782.
Fenn, K., Griffin, N., Uitvlugt, M., & Ravizza, S. (2014). The effect of Twitter exposure on false memory formation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1551–1556. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0639-9.
Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2000). Perceptions of internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515–540. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700304
Haryanto, A. T. (2019). Pengguna internet Indonesia didominasi milenial. Retrieved from: https://inet.detik.com/telecommunication/d-4551389/pengguna-internet-indonesia-didominasi-milenial on August 25 2020.
Juditha, C. (2018). Interaksi komunikasi hoax di media sosial serta antisipasinya. Jurnal Pekommas, 3(1), 31-44. doi: 10.30818/jpkm.2018.2030104
Kaplan, R. L., Van Damme, I., Levine, L. J., & Loftus, E. F. (2016). Emotion and false memory. Emotion Review, 8(1), 8–13.
Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: Indonesia — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. Retrieved from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-indonesia on August 18 2020.
Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100–104. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.100
Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus, D., & Mccann, R. (2003). Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Annals of The International Communication Association, 27(1), 293–335. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029.
Mickes, L., Darby, R. S., Hwe, V., Bajic, D., Warker, J. A., Harris, C. R., & Christenfeld, N. J. (2013). Major memory for microblogs. Memory & Cognition, 41(4), 481–489. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0281-6.
Mitra, T., Wright, G. P., & Gilbert, E. (2017). A Parsimonious Language Model of Social Media Credibility across Disparate Events. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW 17. doi: 10.1145/2998181.2998351
Okado, Y., & Stark, C. E. (2005). Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation. Learning & Memory, 12(1), 3–11. doi: 10.1101/lm.87605
Porter, S., McDougall, A., Bellhouse, S., Brinke, L. Ten, & Wilson, K. (2010). A prospective investigation of the vulnerability of memory for positive and negative emotional scenes to the misinformation effect. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 42(1), 55–61. doi: 10.1037/a0016652
Putra, A. W. (2013). Faster access to news on windows phone with detik.com’s official application. [Akses berita lebih cepat di windows phone dengan aplikasi resmi detik.com]. Retrieved From: https://teknojurnal.com/akses-berita-lebih-cepat-di-windows-phone-dengan-aplikasi-resmi-detik-com/ on March 12 2017.
Smith, V. L., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 294.
Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39–44. doi: 10.1145/301353.301402
Utami, K. D. (2016). Pemanfaatan jejaring sosial line pada komunikasi kelompok Kos Putri “Naomi.” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi UPNYK, 14(1), 48–56.
Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. doi: 10.1177/146144481348 7959
Van Damme, I., & Smets, K. (2014). The power of emotion versus the power of suggestion: Memory for emotional events in the misinformation paradigm. Emotion, 14(2), 310–320. doi: 10.1037/a003462
Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Luo, M., & Geng, H. (2016). The effects of feedback on memory strategies of younger and older adults. PLoS One, 11(12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168896
Zhu, B., Chen, C., F. Loftus, E., Lin, C., & Dong, Q. (2010). Treat and trick: A new way to increase false memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(9), 1199–1208. doi: 10.1002/acp.1637
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., & Dong, Q. (2013). The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories. Memory & Cognition, 41(6), 832–838. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0300-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.54356
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 5483 | views : 4191Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Recent Issues
Vol 51 Issue 1 (2024) Page 1-119 | Vol 50 Issue 3 (2023) Page 219-332 | Vol 50 Issue 2 (2023) Page 125-218 | Vol 50 Issue 1 (2023) Page 1-124 |
Published by Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Building D-6th, Floor No. D-606. Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55281 Email: jurnalpsikologi@ugm.ac.id Phone/whatsApp: +6281125210175 |