Kinetic Study of Biogas Production from Animal Manure and Organic Waste in Semarang City by Using Anaerobic Digestion Method
Fahmi Arifan(1*), Abdullah Abdullah(2), Siswo Sumardiono(3)
(1) Department of Industrial Chemical Engineering Technology, Vocational School, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia
(2) Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia
(3) Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The biogas fermentation from animal manure and organic waste was investigated with a comparison percentage of raw material used inside the digester with the anaerobic digestion process. Animal manure consists of cow dung and chicken manure, while organic waste consists of tofu liquid waste and cabbage waste. This study used a batch process that was operated at 55 °C incubator temperature for 90 days. The results of experimental data were predicted with a modified Gompertz model and first-order kinetic model. The equation of the modified Gompertz model to predict biogas production was with is cumulative production of methane; P∞ = methane production potential; Rm = maximum specific speed methane production; λ = is lag phase period or minimum time to produce biogas; e = math constant (2.7182) and t = biogas production cumulative time. The equation first-order kinetic model was Y = Ym (1-exp(-k). The highest biogas yield was obtained by variable 3 in both kinetic studies compared to 70% cow dung, 15% chicken manure, and 15% tofu liquid waste. Gompertz's kinetic study predicted variable three would produce 3273.20 mL/g of total solid (TS). In comparison, the first-order kinetic model predicted that variable three would produce 3517.95 mL/(g Ts).
Keywords
Full Text:
Full Text PDFReferences
[1] Budiyono, Syaichurrozi, I., and Sumardiono, S., 2014, Kinetic model of biogas yield production from vinasse at various initial pH: Comparison between modified Gompertz model and first-order kinetic model, Res. J. Appl. Sci., Eng. Technol., 7 (13), 2798–2805.
[2] Hussien, F.M., Hamad, A.J., and Faraj, J.J., 2020, Impact of adding cow dung with different ratios on anaerobic co-digestion of waste food for biogas production, J. Mech. Eng. Res. Dev., 43 (7), 213–221.
[3] Ke, L., Liu, X., Du, B., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., and Li, Q., 2019, Component analysis and risk assessment of biogas slurry from biogas plants, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., In Press, Pre-proof.
[4] Budiyono, Widiasa, I.N., Johari, S., and Sunarso, 2010, The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode, Int. J. Chem. Biol. Eng., 3 (1), 39–44.
[5] Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., and Romero, L.I., 2008, Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: Dry thermophilic performances, Bioresour. Technol., 99 (17), 8180–8184.
[6] Budiyono, Wicaksono, A., Rahmawan, A., Matin, H.H.A., Wardani, L.G.K., Kusworo, D.T., and Sumardiono, S., 2017, The effect of pretreatment using sodium hydroxide and acetic acid to biogas production from rice straw waste, MATEC Web. Conf., 101, 02011.
[7] Uzodinma, E.O., 2015, Effect of fresh cow dung starter culture treatment on the onset of flammable and gas yield from pumpkin stalk and maize bract-pig dung biogas systems, Niger. J. Sol. Energy, 26, 123–128.
[8] Kythreotou, N., Florides, G., and Tassou, S.A., 2014, A review of simple to scientific models for anaerobic digestion, Renewable Energy, 71, 701–714.
[9] Yong, Z., Dong, Y., Zhang, X., and Tan, T., 2015, Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production, Renewable Energy, 78, 527–530.
[10] Bhat, R.D.V., Kuipers, J.A.M., and Versteeg, G.F., 2000, Mass transfer with complex chemical reactions in gas-liquid systems: Two-step reversible reactions with unit stoichiometric and kinetic orders, Chem. Eng. J., 76 (2), 127–152.
[11] Awe, O.W., Lu, J., Wu, S., Zhao, Y., Nzihou, A., Lyczko, N., and Minh, D.P., 2018, Effect of oil content on biogas production, process performance and stability of food waste anaerobic digestion, Waste Biomass Valorization, 9 (12), 2295–2306.
[12] Igoni, A.H., Ayotamuno, M.J., Eze, C.L., Ogaji, S.O.T., and Probert, S.D., 2008, Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste, Appl. Energy, 85 (6), 430–438.
[13] Montañés, R., Pérez, M., and Solera, R., 2014, Anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of sewage sludge and sugar beet pulp lixiviation in batch reactors: Effect of pH control, Chem. Eng. J., 225, 492–499.
[14] Olugbemide, A.D., Lajide, L., Adebayo, A., and Owolabi, BJ, 2016, Kinetic study of biogas production from raw and solid-state organosolv pretreated rice husk, J. Biofuels, 7 (2), 110–118.
[15] Syaichurrozi, I., Budiyono, and Sumardiono, S., 2013, Predicting kinetic model of biogas production and biodegradability organic materials: Biogas production from vinasse at variation of COD/N ratio, Bioresour. Technol., 149, 390–397.
[16] Deepanraj, B., Sivasubramanian, V., and Jayaraj, S., 2015, Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic digestion of food waste: The effect of total solids and pH, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 7 (6), 063104.
[17] Möller, K., and Müller, T., 2012, Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review, Eng. Life Sci., 12 (3), 242–257.
[18] Zhang, Q., Hu, J., and Lee, D.J., 2016, Biogas from anaerobic digestion process: Research updates, Renewable Energy, 98, 108–119.
[19] Sumardiono, S., Adisukmo, G., Hanif, M., Budiyono, B., and Cahyono, H., 2021, Effects of pretreatment and ratio of solid sago waste to rumen on biogas production through solid-state anaerobic digestion, Sustainability, 13 (13), 7491.
[20] Ramaraj, R., Unpaprom, Y., and Dussadee, N., 2016, Potential evaluation of biogas production and upgrading through algae, Int. J. New Technol. Res., 2 (3), 128–133.
[21] Razzak, S.A., Ali, S.A.M., Hossain, M.M., and deLasa, H., 2017, Biological CO2 fixation with production of microalgae in wastewater – A review, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 76, 379–390.
[22] Abdullahi, I., Isma'il, A., Musa, A.O., and Galadima, A., 2011, Effect of kinetic parameters on biogas production from local substrate using a batch feeding digester, Eur. J. Sci. Res., 57 (4), 626–634.
[23] Rahmat, B., Hartoyo, T., and Sunarya, Y., 2014, Biogas production from tofu liquid waste on treated agricultural wastes, Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 9 (2), 226–231.
[24] Bharde, N.M., Shivay, Y.S., and Singh, S., 2003, Effect of biogas slurry and neem oil-treated urea sources on rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system, Indian J. Agron., 48 (2), 73–77.
[25] Arifan, F., Muhammad, F., Winarni, S., Devara, H.R., and Hanum, L., 2018, Optimization of methane gas formation rate with the addition of EM4 starter-made from tofu liquid waste and husk rice waste using biogas reactor-fixed dome in Langensari West Ungaran, E3S Web Conf., 3, 02016.
[26] Brandi, J., and Wilson-Wilde, L., 2013, "Standard Methods" in Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 3, 2nd Ed., Eds. Siegel, J.A., and Saukko. PJ, Academic Press, Waltham, Massachusetts, 522–527.
[27] Prasetyo, T., Sumardiono, S., Aji, H.A., and Pratama, A.Y., 2017, Effect of C/N ratio and pH on biogas production from industrial cassava starch wastewater through anaerobic process, Adv. Sci. Lett., 23 (6), 5810–5814.
[28] Zhai, N., Zhang, T., Yin, D., Yang, G., Wang, X., Ren, G., and Feng, Y., 2015, Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cow manure, Waste Manage, 38, 126–131.
[29] Arifan, F., Abdullah, A., and Sumardiono, S., 2021, Effect of organic waste addition into animal manure on biogas production using anaerobic digestion method, Int. J. Renewable Energy Dev., 10 (3), 623–633.
[30] Latinwo, G.K., and Agarry, S.E., 2015, Modelling the kinetics of biogas production from mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung with plantain peels, Int. J. Renewable Energy Dev., 4 (1), 55–63.
[31] Ponugoti, P.V., and Janardhanan, V.M., 2020, Mechanistic kinetic model for biogas dry reforming, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 59 (33), 14737–14746.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.65056
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 4364 | views : 3588Copyright (c) 2021 Indonesian Journal of Chemistry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Chemistry (ISSN 1411-9420 /e-ISSN 2460-1578) - Chemistry Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
View The Statistics of Indones. J. Chem.