Evaluating Current Increased Price and Fattening Cost of BX Cattle with ESCAS Cost on Slaughtered Cattle Price and their Welfare

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v47i1.78643

Puradireja Rino Hadiwijaya(1*), Daud Rivianda Andre(2), Ramdani Diky(3)

(1) Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas Padjajaran, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia
(2) Department of Socio-Economic of Livestock Development, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia
(3) Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, 45363, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Australian Brahman Cross (BX) cattle industry is very modern. They have created a comprehensive system guided by the principles of animal welfare. The importation of BX cattle by companies in Indonesia will be bound by the Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System (ESCAS) regulations. This study aimed to evaluate the current increased price and fattening cost of feeder Brahman Cross (BX) cattle along with ESCAS additional cost on the price of slaughtered cattle and their welfare. Based on the results, the animal welfare assessment in the feedlot for 120 days were considered good, with the average value in the first month 86.40%, then in the second month 88.50%, in the third month 92.14%, and the fourth month 94.29%. Based on the calculations result of the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method in each supply chain, it is known that procurement costs, including the purchase of feeders, contributed to 94,0% of the total costs, while other costs were handling costs 2.70%, cost of ESCAS 1.56%, selling cost 1.52%, and the lowest, maintenance cost 0.24%. Therefore, to fatten Australian BX cattle, special strategies are needed, such as: optimizing stock in the feedlot; efficiency cost in feed ingredients without reducing quality; applying animal welfare rules to minimize handling costs and selecting vendors who want the lower price in providing ESCAS support facilities and establishing regular maintenance of the ESCAS supporting tools.

Keywords


ABC Method; Animal Welfare, BX Feeder cattle price; Cost; ESCAS

Full Text:

PDF


References

Agus, A. and T. S. M. Widi. 2018. Current situation and future prospects for beef cattle production in Indonesia - A review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 976–983. https://doi:10.5713/ajas.18.0233.

Ahmed, H., K. Alvåsen, C. Berg, H. Hansson, J. Hultgren, H. Röcklinsberg, and U. Emanuelson. 2021. Assessing animal welfare and farm profitability in cow-calf operations with stochastic partial budgeting. Animals. 11: 1–12. https://doi:10.3390/ ani11020382.

Apuke, O. D. 2017. Quantitative research methods : a synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. 6: 40–47. https://doi:10.12816/0040336.

Astiti, N. M. A. G. R. 2022. Margin analysis and marketing efficiency of Bali cattle post covid-19 pandemic. Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service. 3: 585–591.

Bank Indonesia. 2022. Kurs Transaksi Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/ informasi-kurs/transaksi-bi/default.aspx.

Bernawati, Y. and L. Fatmawati. 2021. Utilization of activity based costing method to calculate the cost of production and evaluate profit. Small Business Accounting Management and Entrepreneurship Review 1: 11–21.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2022. Peternakan Dalam Angka Tahun 2022. Jakarta.

Carli, G. and M. Canavari. 2013. Introducing direct costing and activity based costing in a farm management system: a conceptual model. Procedia Technology. 8: 397–405. https://doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.052.

Carli, G., M. Canavari, and A. Grandi. 2014. Introducing activity-based costing in farm management: The design of the FarmBO system. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems. 5: 69–84. https://doi:10.4018/ijaeis.2014 100104.

Darman, J. F. Bawotong, and E. Aprina. 2022. Tantangan dan hambatan Indonesia pasca ratifikasi perjanjian kemitraan Republic Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. Jurnal de Jure. 14: 59-76.

Fernandes, J. N., P. H. Hemsworth, G. J. Coleman, and A. J. Tilbrook. 2021. Costs and benefits of improving farm animal welfare. Agriculture (Switzerland). 11: 1–14. https://doi:10.3390/agriculture11020104.

Giyono, G., A. Daryanto, and D. Indrawan. 2020. Dynamics of cattle fattening industry in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis 17: 274-284. https://doi:10. 17358/jma.17.3.274.

Hansson, H. and C. J. Lagerkvist. 2016. Dairy farmers’ use and non-use values in animal welfare: Determining the empirical content and structure with anchored best-worst scaling. J. Dairy Sci. 99: 579–592. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9755.

ben Hassen, T. and H. el Bilali. 2022. Impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war on global food security: towards more sustainable and resilient food systems? Foods. 11: 2301. https://doi:10.3390/foods11152301.

Kartalis, N., I. Velentzas, and G. Broni. 2020. Can time-driven activity-based costing applied in show caves. In: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. p. 419–428.

Komalawati, R. W. Asmarantaka, R. Nurmalina, and D. B. Hakim. 2019. Modeling price volatility and supply response of Beef in Indonesia. Tropical Animal Science Journal. 42: 159–166. https://doi:10.5398/tasj.2019. 42.2.159.

Komalawati, R. Winandi, R. Nurmalina, and D. B. Hakim. 2018. Dampak volatilitas harga daging sapi terhadap industri pengolahan daging sapi skala mikro di Indonesia. Jurnal Pangan 27: 9–22.

Kuswati, W. A. Septian, I. Novianti, and M. Nasich. 2020. Ilmu dan Manajemen Ternak Pedaging. 1st ed. Tim UB Press, Malang.

Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA). 2012. Prosedur standar operasional untuk kesejahteraan ternak. Meat & Livestock Australia, Ltd., North Sydney NSW 2060.

Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA). 2018. State of The Industry Report 2018: The Australian red meat and livestock industry. Meat & Livestock Australia, Ltd., North Sydney NSW 2060.

Nguyen, P. H., L. M. Hoang, and D. D. Nguyen. 2020. ASEAN- Australia trade relations by stages of processing: comparative research. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration 4: 73–83. https://doi:10. 14710/jmsni.v4i2.7993.

Novalia, N., R. H. Ismono, and A. Nugraha. 2021. Penentuan harga pokok penjualan usaha penggemukan sapi potong mitra dan non-mitra di Desa Astomulyo Kecamatan Punggur Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis. 9: 622-629. https://doi:10.23960/jiia.v9i4.5399.

Pavlyuchenko, T. and N. Kosteva. 2020. Application of the ABC method in animal husbandry. BIO Web Conf. 17: 00244. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20201700244.

Puspitawati, E., D. P. Gayatri, and A. Sari. 2019. Daya saing produk perdagangan Indonesia pasca kerjasama ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand FTA. Jurnal Teknologia Aliansi Perguruan Tinggi (APERTI) BUMN 2: 18–35.

Rosenstein, T. 2016. Impact of the 2015 U.S. dollar rise on export prices and on the agricultural industry. Beyond The Number. 5: 1–8.

Rusdianto, S. W., H. K. Daryanto, Kuntjoro, and A. Priyanti. 2015. Pengaruh perubahan harga sapi terhadap permintaan input dan penawaran output usaha penggemukan sapi Bali. Informatika Pertanian 24: 223–232.

Sandi, S., M. Desiarni, and Asmak. 2018. Manajemen pakan ternak sapi potong di Peternakan Rakyat di Desa Sejaro Sakti Kecamatan Indralaya Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya 7: 21–29.

Sartorello, G. L., J. P. S. T. Bastos, and A. H. Gameiro. 2018. Development of a calculation model and production cost index

for feedlot beef cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 47: 1-11. https://doi:10.1590/ rbz4720170215.

Setiadi, A., S. I. Santoso, M. Mukson, S. Nurfadillah, and K. Prayoga. 2020. Utilization of electronic marketing and economic determinants to improve income of dairy cattle farmer in Boyolali, Central Java - Indonesia. J Indones Trop Anim Agric. 45: 243–249. https://doi:10.14710/ jitaa.45.3.243-249.

Siregar, P. S., Hasnudi, E. Mirwandhono, and B. Simanullang. 2022. Knowledge level and application of animal welfare aspects at Binjai City Slaughterhouse. Jurnal Peternakan Integratif 10: 145–153. https://doi:10.32734/jpi.v10i3.10437.

Stašová, L. H. 2020. Statistical analysis of suitability of the activity based costing method in agricultural enterprises. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 6: 20–42.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Suhendar, E. and Sukardi. 2022. Situation analysis of fulfillment of beef needs and opportunities for beef cattle partnership. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1063: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1063/1/012027

Sukanata, I. W., Suciani, and K. W. Parimartha. 2014. Analisa pendapatan dan efisiensi ekonomis penggunaan pakan pada usahatani penggemukan sapi Bali. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan 17: 20–24.

Tanuputri, M. R. and H. Bai. 2022. Analysis of Logistics cost on smallholder and middleman to foster tea supply chain: a case study in Central Java Province, Indonesia. Agritech 42: 155. https://doi:10. 22146/agritech.63671.

Webster, J. 2016. Animal welfare: Freedoms, dominions and “A life worth living.” Animals. 6: 1-6. https://doi:10.3390/ani6060035.

Windsor, P. A. 2021. Progress with livestock welfare in extensive production systems: lessons from Australia. Front. Vet. Sci. 8: 1-9. https://doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.674482.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v47i1.78643

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 648 | views : 339

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:

   
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.