Comparison of Electronic Cow Record (REKS-EL) Feature with Recording Components Used by Dairy Farmers In Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta

Glorina Desviani Desviani; Yuni Suranindyah; Dyah Maharani

doi:10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i2.72424

Comparison of Electronic Cow Record (REKS-EL) Feature with Recording Components Used by Dairy Farmers In Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i2.72424

Glorina Desviani Desviani⁽¹⁾, Yuni Suranindyah^(2*), Dyah Maharani⁽³⁾

(1) Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Universitas gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The study was conducted in 60 respondents of dairy farmers in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta from August 2020 to February 2021. The study aims to make comparison between recording in the REKS-EL version 1.0 and those in dairy farms recording, in order to improve REKS-EL features. Data of the farmer characteristics and recording components were collected by interviewed. Identification of components the dairy farmers recording was carried out using a list of questions in a table. The list contains 43 components, which were arranged based on the recording guidelines as written in the Indonesian Minister of Agriculture No. 100, 2014. The result of comparison between dairy farmers recording and REKS-EL version 1.0 feature showed differences on recording content. Software REKS-EL has more recording components than dairy farmers recording, as much as 23 vs. 13 (46% vs. 23% of total components). The REKS-EL feature showed advantages on data of pedigree, and reproduction but needs to be improved with the additional components derived from farmer records, namely daily and weekly milk production. In the REKS-EL feature also needs to be added feed data, body condition score and calf after birth.

Keywords

Comparison; Recording; REKS-EL; Dairy cow

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anggraeni, A. and M. Elmy. 2016. Penilaian aspek teknis pemeliharaan sapi perah untuk praktik susu yang baik pada peternakan sapi perah rakyat. AGRIPET. 16: 103-109.

Awan, J. S., A. Atabany and B. P. Purwanto. 2016. Efek kelahiran pertama kinerja produksi susu Holstein Friesian di BBPTU-HPT Baturraden. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Produksi dan Teknologi Pertanian 04: 75-79.

Desviani, G., Y. Y. Suranindyah and D. Maharani. 2020. Identifikasi media dan komponen rekording yang digunakan oleh peternak sapi perah Kabupaten Sleman. Makalah Seminar Nasional SIMNASTER, Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Dewantri, M. and A. A. Oka. 2020. Penampilan pedet sapi Bali hasil inseminasi buatan dari pejantan berbeda. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan 23: 39-42.

Haryati, L. N., W. Tyasningsih, R. N. Praja, S. Chusniati, M. N. Yunita, and P. A. Wibawati. 2019. Isolasi dan identifikasi Staphylococcus aureus pada susu kambing Peranakan Etawah penderita mastitis subklinis di kelurahan Kalipuro, Banyuwangi. Jurnal Medik Veteriner 2: 76-82.

Kurniawati, U., P. Trisunuwati, and S. Wahyuningsih. 2010. Efek vaksinasi brucella pada sapi perah dengan berbagai paritas terhadap efisiensi reproduksi. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Peternakan JIIPB 20: 38-47.

Makin, M. 2011. Tata Laksana Peternakan Sapi Perah. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Makin, M. and D. Suharwanto. 2012. Performa sifat-sifat produksi susu dan reproduksi sapi Fries Holland di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak 12: 39-44.

Munawaroh, L. H., N. Humaidah and D. Suryanto. 2020. Studi kasus kawin berulang pada sapi perah Peranakan Frisian Holland di wilayah kerja petugas kesehatan hewan Batu. Jurnal Dinamika Rekasatwa 3: 113-117

Murfiani and Fini. 2018. Permentan Nomor 26/2017 tentang program kemitraan antara pelaku usaha persusuan nasional dan peternak dan koperasi. http://ditjennak.

Nurdyansyah, F., T. D. A. Mukmina and R. M. D. Ujianti. 2020. Perbandingan aktivitas anti mikroba ekstrak etanol, etil asetat dan petroleum eterlimonia acidissima pada bakteri Staphylococcus aureus dan Echerichia coli. Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian (SNHP). Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas PGRI Semarang.

Nurhayu, A., A. Ella, dan M. Sariubang. 2017. Perbaikan pakan pada sapi induk sapi perah sedang laktasi di Kabupaten Enrekang, Sulawesi Selatan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. Makassar. PP 132-138.

Nurjanah, T., M. Hartono dan S. Suharyati. 2013. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat konsentrat sapi setelah sinkronisasi estrus. Kabupaten Pringsewu. Universitas Lampung.

Prasojo, G. and M. Kusdiantoro. 2010. Korelasi bobot badan, jenis kelamin terhadap Inseminasi Buatan (IB) sapi Bali. Jurnal Veteriner 11: 41-45.

Pribadiningtyas, P. A., T. H. Suprayogi, and P. Sambodo. 2012. Hubungan berat dan volume kambing Etawa terhadap produksi susu. Jurnal Peternakan Hewan 1: 99-105.

Purwaningsih, T. and W. Kia. 2018. Identifikasi dan rekording sapi perah di Peternakan Biara Novisiat Claritien Benlutu, Timor Tengah Selatan. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Peternakan 3: 42- 49.

Suherman, D. and Sutriyono. 2021. Analisis finansial peternakan sapi perah peternak Gapoktan Sumber Mulya di Kabupaten Kapahiang Bengkulu. Buletin Peternakan Tropis 2: 39-47

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v46i2.72424