THE EVALUATION OF SILICA+ SUPPLEMENTATION IN DIFFERENT TYPE OF DIET ON PERFORMANCE, NUTRIENT RETENTION AND THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF BROILERS DIET

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.24976

Irfan Anshory(1*), Sumiati Sumiati(2), Indah Wijayanti(3)

(1) Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 16680
(2) Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 16680
(3) Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 16680
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aimed to evaluate the effect of silica+ supplementation (Si) in different types of diet on performance, nutrient retention (energy, protein, fat), and the economic value of broiler diet. The treatment diets are 1. HN (high nutrient), 2. HN+Si, 3. LN (low nutrient), 4. LN+Si, 5. HNRB (high nutrient contained rice bran) and 6. HNRB+Si. A number of 1440 unsexed day old chicks (CP707 strains) were arranged in a com­pletely randomized design consisted of 6 treatments and each treatment was replicated six times.  The results showed that silica+ supplementation in HNRB and LN diets did not affect the performance and nutrient retention. The HNRB diet produced low fat retention, high FCR during starter period, and lower body weight during starter and grower period (P<0.05). The LN diet resulted high FCR during starter period (P<0.05), however it had no effects on the body weight. Silica+ supplementation on HN diet decreased the FCR by 8.09% during the grower period (P<0.05). Besides, it increased the fat retention and true metabolizable energy corrected by nitrogen (TMEn) by 1.30% and 4.41%, respectively. In general, silica+ supplementation was applied on the high nutrient diet during the grower period (22 to 35 days of ages) was effective. HN+Si produced the highest economic value diet in terms of income over feed and chick cost (IOFCC) increasing by 11.07% and relative feed cost (RFC) decreasing by 4.16%.


Keywords


Broilers; Feed additive; Rice bran; Silica+

Full Text:

PDF


References

Amad, A. A., K. Manner, K. R. Wendler, K. Neumann and J. Zentek. 2011. Effects of a phytogenic feed additive on growth performance and ileal nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 90: 2811–2816.

Ani, A. O., I. Kalu, L. C. Ugwuowo and E. A. Iloh. 2013. Dietary effect of rice milling waste and supplementary enzyme on performance of broiler chicks. Afr. J. Biotech. 12: 5326-5332.

Anuradha, P. and B. Roy. 2015. Effect of supplementation of fiber degrading enzymes on performance of broiler chickens fed diets containing de-oiled rice bran. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10: 179-184

Astuti, D. A. dan Sumiati. 2014. Bioenergetika Ternak Tropika. IPB Press, Bogor.

Brickett, K. E., J. P. Dahiya, H. L. Classen and S. Gomis. 2007. Influence of dietary nutrient density, feed form, and lighting on growth and meat yield of broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 86: 2172–2181

Elmusharaf, M. A., J. J. Cuppen, H. N. A. Grooten, and A. C. Beynen. 2007. Antagonistic effect of electromagnetic field exposure on coccidiosis infection in broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 86: 2139–2143.

Europe Union Commission. 2005. Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect. Regulation 1831/2003/EC on additives for use in animal nutrition, replacing Directive 70/524/EEC on additives in feed-stuffs. Brussels, 22 December.

Gallinger, C. I., D. M, Sua’rez and A. Irazusta. 2004. Effects of rice bran inclusion on performance and bone mineralization in broiler chicks. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 13: 183-190.

Hetland, H., M. Choct, and B. Svihus. 2004. Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. J. World’s Poult Sci. 60: 415-422.

Humer, E., C. Schwarz, and K. Schedle. 2014. Phytate in pig and poultry nutrition. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 99: 605-625.

Jarmani, S. N. dan A. G. Nataamijaya. 2001. Penampilan ayam ras pedaging dengan menambahkan tepung lempuyang (zingiber aromaticum val) di dalam ransum dan kemungkinan pengembangannya. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner.

Jequier, E. and F. Constant. 2010. Water as an essential nutrient: the physiological basis of hydration. EJCN 64: 115–123.

Kasula, R. 2015. Silica+ A Natural and Unique Concept for Improving Animal Performance and Farm Enviroment. Ceresco Nutrition, Canada.

Kumar, V., A. K. Sinha, H. P. S. Makkar, and K. Becker. 2010. Dietary roles of phytate and phytase in human nutrition: A review. J. Food Chem. 120: 945-959.

Leeson, S. and J. D. Summers. 2005. Commercial Poultry Nutrition. Ed ke-3. University Books, Canada.

Li, W., Y. Guo, J. Chen, R. Wang, Y. He, and D. Su. 2010. Influence of lighting schedule and nutrient density in broiler chickens: effect on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1510-1518.

Maradon, G. G., Sumiati, R. Mutia, dan W. Winarsih. 2017. Evaluasi penggunaan silika+ sebagai feed additive terhadap metabolisme mineral, status kesehatan dan kualitas ekskreta broiler. Buletin Peternakan 41: 1-10.

Mateos, G. G., E. Jimenez-Moreno, M. P. Serrano and P. Lazaro. 2012. Poultry response to high levels of dietary fiber sources varying in physical and chemical characteristics. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 21: 159-174.

Mirshekar, R., B. Dastar, B. Shabanpour and S. Hassani. 2013. Effect of dietary nutrient density and vitamin premix withdrawal on performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. J. Sci. Food Agric.  93: 2979-2985.

Mujahid, A., M. Asif, I. Haq, M. Abdullah and A. H. Gilani. 2003. Nutrient digestibility of broiler feeds containing different levels of variously processed rice bran stored for different periods. J. Poult. Sci. 82: 1438-1443.

Nielsen, B. L. 2004. Behavioural aspects of feeding constraints: do broilers follow their gut feelings. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 86: 251-260.

Phromkunthong, W. 2015. Effect of silica supplement on growth performance and health condition of juvenile shrimp. Aqua Culture Asia Pasific 11: 43-46.

Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2009 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan: Pasal 22 ayat 4c. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sibbald, I. R. and M. S. Wolynetz. 1985. Relationships between estimates of bioavilable energy made with adults cockerels and chick, effects of feed intake and nitrogen retention. J. Poult. Sci. 64: 127-138.

Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1993. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Ed ke-2. Sumantri B, penerjemah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.  

Sumiati. 2005. Rasio molar asam fitat : zn untuk menentukan suplementasi zn serta penambahan enzim fitase dalam ransum berkadar asam fitat tinggi. Disertasi, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Tran, S. T., M. E. Bowman and T. K. Smith. 2015. Effects of a silica-based feed supplement on performance, health, and litter quality of growing turkeys. J. Poult. Sci. 94: 1902-1908.

Ulupi, N., I. R. H. Soesanto, S. K. Inayah. 2015. Performa ayam broiler dengan pemberian serbuk pinang sebagai feed aditive. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan. 03: 8-11.

Wenk, C. 2000. Recent advances in animal feed additives such as metabolic modifiers, antimicrobial agents, probiotics, enzymes and highly available minerals review. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 13: 86-95.

Williams, P. E. V., P. A. Geraert, G. Uzu and G. Annison. 1997. Factors affecting non-starch polysaccharide digestibility in poultry. J. CIHEAM: 125-135.

Yamabhai, M., S. Chumseng, K. Yoohat and W. Srila. 2014. Diverse biological effects of electromagnetic-treated water. J. Homeopathy 103: 186-192.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v41i4.24976

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1169 | views : 941

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:

 Harvard Library
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.