* Corresponding Author
Declining Democracy and Constrained Voices: A Habermasian and Foucauldian Critique of Indonesian Freedom of Expression
https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.95754 Althien John Pesurnay(1*), Zamzam Muhammad Fuad(2)
(1) Multimedia Nusantara University
(2) National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article analyzes the state of freedom of expression in the context of democratic decline in Indonesia, using the concepts of Jurgen Habermas's public sphere and Michel Foucault's governmentality. The aim is to defend the basic principles of democracy by emphasizing the urgency of freedom of expression to respond to this political condition. Habermas's idea of the public sphere emphasizes the importance of a rational and open discussion space to encourage the formation of deliberative democracy. Meanwhile, Foucault's idea of governmentality will be employed to understand how the state produces regulations and disciplines citizen behavior through certain discourses for certain interests. This article shows that the practice of freedom of expression in Indonesia has been constrained by regulations in the form of rules and regulations and subtle discursive practices, such as the mainstreaming of democratic politeness discourse. The first part of this article discusses the relationship between Indonesia's democratic regression and the situation of freedom of expression in Indonesia. The second part is an assessment of the situation of freedom of expression using Habermas's concept of the public sphere. The third part focuses on the governmentality practices carried out by the state to repress freedom of expression.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amnesty International. (n.d.). Freedom of expression. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/freedom-of-expression/
Amnesty International. (2023, May 29). Puluhan korban kriminalisasi UU ITE jalan santai sambil dorong revisi UU ITE. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.id/kabar-terbaru/siaran-pers/puluhan-korban-kriminalisasi-uu-ite-jalan-santai-sambil-dorong-revisi-uu-ite/05/2023/
Anindyajati, T. (2021). Limitation of the right to freedom of speech on the Indonesian Constitutional Court consideration. Indonesian Law Journal, 14(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.33331/ilj.v14i1.45
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale:Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., Fossati, D., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Elites, masses, and democratic decline in Indonesia. Democratization, 27(4), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1680971
Azanella, L. A., & Galih, B. (2019, January 30). Selain Ahmad Dhani, ini daftar orang yang divonis karena terjerat UU ITE. Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/01/30/18493331/selain-ahmad-dhani-ini- daftar-orang-yang-divonis-karena-terjerat-uu-ite?page=all
Azhar, H. (2021, August 20). Ada Lord Luhut dibalik relasi ekonomi-ops militer Intan Jaya, jenderal BIN juga ada, NgeHAMtam [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xMlnuOtBAs
Budiardjo, M. (1981). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Gramedia.
Budiardjo, M. (2018). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Chaterine, R., & Erdianto, K. (2021, May 6). Hasil survei LP3ES, masyarakat makin takut menyatakan pendapat. Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/05/06/16561701/hasil-survei-lp3es-masyarakat-makin-takut-menyatakan-pendapat
Cosentino, V. J. (1991). Strategic lawsuits against public participation: An analysis of the solutions. California Western Law Review, 27(2), 399–429. https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol27/iss2/8
detikcom. (2023, December 12). Haris Azhar-Fatia Akan Divonis Senin 8 Januari 2024. detikcom. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7085041/haris-azhar-fatia-akan-divonis-senin-8-januari-2024
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009
Eide, E. (2019). Chilling effects on free expression: Surveillance, threats and harassment. In R. Krøvel & M. Thowsen (Eds.), Making Transparency Possible: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (pp. 227–242). Cappelen Damm Forskning.
Farisa, F. C., & Krisiandi. (2021, June 29). Respons kritik BEM UI, Jokowi ingatkan tata krama dan sopan santun. Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/06/29/15515191/respons-kritik-bem-ui-jokowi-ingatkan-tata-krama-dan-sopan-santun
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (2018). Parrhesia: Berani berkata benar (H. Cahyadi, Trans.). Marjin Kiri.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Freedom House. (2014). Freedom in The world 2014: The annual survey of political right and civil liberties. Rowman and Littlefield.
Freedom House. (2023). Indonesia: Freedom in the world 2023 country report. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/indonesia/freedom-world/2023
Freedom House. (2024). Indonesia: Freedom in the world 2024 country report. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/indonesia/freedom-world/2024
Freedom House. (2025, February 26). New Report: Amid unprecedented wave of elections, political violence and armed conflict fueled 19th consecutive year of decline in global freedom. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/article/new-report-amid-unprecedented-wave-elections-political-violence-and-armed-conflict-fueled
Habermas, J. (2015). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). On the pragmatics of communication (M. Cooke, Trans.). Penguin Random House.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). MIT Press.
Habermas, J.. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964) (S. Lennox & F. Lennox, Trans.). New German Critique, 3(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737 (Original work published 1964)
Hadiz, V. R. (2016). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.
Hamdi, I. (2021, October 14). Tak acuh penelitian, Moeldoko tutup mediasi. Tempo. https://koran.tempo.co/read/nasional/468700/kepala-staf-kepresidenan-moeldoko-menutup-mediasi-dengan-peneliti-icw
Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2020, October 25). Politik, demokrasi, dan pilkada di era pandemi COVID-19 [PowerPoint slides]. Indikator Politik Indonesia. https://indikator.co.id/rilis-survei-nasional-indikator-251020/
Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2022, April 3). Trust terhadap institusi politik, isu-isu mutakhir, dan dinamika elektoral jelang pemilu serentak 2024 [PowerPoint slides]. Indikator Politik Indonesia. https://indikator.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/RILIS-03-04-22_Survei-Nasional_2022_3_APRIL_2022.pdf
Inkeputri, N. Y., & Rustamaji, M. (2022). Tindak pidana ujaran kebencian (hate speech) melalui internet (kajian terhadap Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret]. UNS Institutional Repository. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/85431/
Jemadu, L. (2022, March 2). Korban terbanyak UU ITE pada 2021 adalah aktivis. Suara.com. https://www.suara.com/tekno/2022/03/02/181517/korban-terbanyak-uu-ite-pada-2021-adalah-aktivis
Keller, A. (2009). Tantangan dari dalam: Otonomi redaksi di 4 media cetak nasional: Kompas, Koran Tempo, Media Indonesia, Republika. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/indonesien/09806.pdf
Kurniawan, M. A. E. (2023). Sejarah UU ITE di Indonesia: Perkembangan regulasi dan kontroversi dunia digital. Narasi.https://narasi.tv/read/narasi-daily/sejarah-uu-ite
Mainake, Y., & Nola, L. F. (2020). Dampak pasal-pasal multitafsir dalam Undang-Undang tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. In INFO Singkat: Kajian Singkat terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis, 12(16), 1-6. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/perpustakaan/sipinter/files/sipinter-2476-307-20210722101750.pdf
McBrayer, L. (2005). The DirecTV Cases: Applying anti-SLAPP Laws to copyright protection cease-and-desist letters. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20(2), 603–623. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24119494
Muhtadi, B. (2020). Kuasa uang: Politik uang dalam pemilu pasca-Orde Baru. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Nababan, W. M. C. (2024, January 31). Democracy index falls, press freedom is also threatened. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2024/01/31/en-indeks-demokrasi-turun-kebebasan-pers-turut-terancam
Ong, E. (2021). Online repression and self-censorship: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Government and Opposition, 56(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.18
Power, T. P. (2018). Jokowi’s authoritarian turn and Indonesia’s democratic decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 307-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1549918
Power, T. (2021). Democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression?. ISEAS Publishing.
Pranata, G. (2021, November 12). Aktivis dan jurnalis korban UU ITE, siapa saja mereka?. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/aktivis-dan-jurnalis-korban-uu-ite-siapa-saja-mereka--455020
Prayoga, F. (2021, August 2). Fadjroel Rachman: Kritik boleh, tapi ingat budaya kesopansantunan. KompasTV. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/197967/fadjroel-rachman-kritik-boleh-tapi-ingat-budaya-kesopansantunan
Priyanto, G. A., & Sardi, M. (2021). The urgency of protecting netizen in freedom of speech on social media. Media of Law and Sharia, 2(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v2i1.11480
Riyadi, E., & Hadi, S. (2021). Strategic Lawsuit against Public Participation (SLAPP): A legal-based threat to freedom of expression. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 8(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n1.a7
Sekar, A. (2024, April 6). Central Java activist jailed for Facebook post opposing shrimp farming. https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2024/04/06/central-java-activist-jailed-for-facebook-post-opposing-shrimp-farming.html
Setiawan, K. M. P. (2020). A state of surveillance? Freedom of expression under the Jokowi presidency. In T. Power, & E. Warburton (Eds.), Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression? (pp. 254-274). ISEAS Publishing.
Setiawan, M. N. (2021). Mengkritisi Undang-Undang ITE Pasal 27 Ayat (3) dilihat dari sosio-politik hukum pidana Indonesia. Datin Law Jurnal, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.36355/dlj.v1i1
Steinhoff, U., & Schöllner, K. (2009). The philosophy of Jürgen Habermas: A critical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Tapsell, R. (2017). Trik lama di era baru: Swasensor dalam jurnalisme Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 1(2), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v1i2.7816
Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s democratic regression: Structure, agency and popular opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255-285. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2k
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96, 11-33. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/54621
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.95754
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3082
| 
views : 2973
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Filsafat