Date Log
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Carrying Capacity Based on Ecosystem Services for Biodiversity Conservation in the Petungkriyono Essential Ecosystem Area Candidate
Corresponding Author(s) : Nurwidya Ambarwati
Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan,
Vol 17 No 1 (2023): March
Abstract
The Petungkriyono protected and production forests qualified for the Essential Ecosystem Area (EEA). Perhutani manages the area, covering approximately ±7,683.33 hectares, with 80% being secondary natural forests and the habitat for endangered flora and fauna. This research aimed to analyze the suitability of Petungkriyono EEA for biodiversity preservation, protection, sustainable use, and ecosystem restoration using carrying capacity based on ecosystem services (CCES). This research used a participatory approach and expert opinion with a weighting sum on land cover and landscape variables. The results showed that approximately 74.12% of the Petungkriyono AAE candidate had high and very high CCES classes and were suitable for biodiversity and area protection priorities. Meanwhile, 14.35% was in a low class and suitable for ecosystem restoration and sustainable use priorities.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Allan, J.R., et al. 2017. Recent Increases in Human Pressure and Forest Loss Threaten Many Natural World Heritage Sites. Biol. Conservation., 206 (2017), pp.47-55. 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.011.
- BKSDA Jawa Tengah. 2019. Laporan Kegiatan Identifikasi Calon Lokasi Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial (KEE) Kawasan Hutan Petungkriyono Kabupaten Pekalongan. KLHK; Jawa Tengah
- Diaz, S., Settele, J. and Brondízio, E. et al. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://ipbes.net/news/ipbes-global-assessment-summary-policymakers-pdf. Accessed December 2019.
- Geldmann, J, et al. 2013. Effectiveness of Terrestrial Protected Areas in Reducing Habitat Loss and Population Declines. Biological Conservation volume 161, pages 230-238. doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018
- Harris, Linda R., Defe, Omar. 2022. Sandy Shore Ecosystem Services, Ecological Infrastructure, and Bundles: New Insights and Perspectives. Ecosystem Services 57 (2022)101477. doi.org/10.1016/f.ecoser.2022.101477.
- IUCN/SSC. 2009. The IUCN Red List of the Threstened Species. URL.http://www.iucnredlist.org Diakses 8 Maret 2023
- Sahide, M.A.K, et al. 2020. Anticipating a New Conservation Bureaucrazy? Land and Power in Indonesia’s Essential Ecosystem Area Policy. Land Use Policy Volume 97, September 2020, 104789. doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104789.
- Setiawan, I., et al. 2012. Laporan Kajian Flora Dan Fauna Di Cagar Alam Gunung Burangrang Kabupaten Bandung Dan Purwakarta Provinsi Jawa Barat. Bandung.
- Undang-Undang RI Nomor 5 tahun 1990 tentang KSDAE
- Undang-Undang RI Nomor 41 tahun 1999 tentang kehutanan
- Undang-Undang RI Nomor 32 tahun 2009 tentang perlindungan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup
- Undang-Undang RI Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang pemerintahan daerah
- Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 28 Tahun 2011 tentang pengelolaan kawasan suaka alam dan kawasan pelestarian alam
- Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 7 tahun 1999 tentang pengawetan jenis tumbuhan dan satwa
- Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 45 tahun 2004 tentang perlindungan hutan
- Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 46 Tahun 2017 tentang instrumen ekonomi lingkungan
- Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.106/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/12/2018 tentang jenis tumbuhan dan satwa yang dilindungi
- SK Balai KSDA Jawa Tengah 180/IV-KKH/2015 tentang penetapan dua puluh lima satwa terancam punah prioritas