DELPHI TECHNIQUE: CONSENSUS OF ANATOMY CIRCULATORY SYSTEM CORE SYLLABUS FOR MEDICAL STUDENT

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.39101

Siti Munawaroh(1*), Farhah Millata Hanifa(2), Nanang Wiyono(3), Yunia Hastami(4), Nur Dewi Kartikasari(5), Bulan Kakanita Hermasari(6)

(1) Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta – INDONESIA
(2) Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta – INDONESIA
(3) Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta – INDONESIA
(4) Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta – INDONESIA
(5) Midwifery Programme, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta – INDONESIA
(6) Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta – INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Anatomy is a very important basic science in medical education. However, the advance of science and technology affected medical curriculum. One of the changes is the decreased time available for anatomy learning. Therefore, an anatomy lecturer needs to sort and choose from many existing anatomical materials to adjust with time allocation. The purpose of this study is to gain consensus on what minimum anatomical knowledge is for a physician candidate in order to practice safely.

Method: This study was design in qualitative approach with two round Delphi Technique. Using purposive sampling method, the subjects of the study were 20 general-physicians in Indonesia. The questionnare was arranged based on anatomy text book and the research about anatomic core syllabus. The firts Delphi aimed to select the anatomical course material and additional course material. The second Delphi round intended to provide level range from 1-4. The consensus level established by researcher at 60% point.

Results: There is not any additional topics in the first Delphi round. So the number of first and second round topics is 270 topics. The Delphi second round agree that anatomic core syllabus of circulation system is 110 of 270 topics. There are 30 topics of cor, 3 topics of pericardium, 10 topics of mediastinum, 37 topics of artery, 9 topics of vena, 9 topics of lymphathic system, 4 topics of postnatal circulation, 5 topics of prenatal circulation, and 3 topics of portal hepatic system.

Conclusion: The anatomy core syllabus consists of 110 of the 270 anatomical circulatory system topics.


Keywords


Core syllabus, anatomy circulation system, general physician consensus, Delphi technique.

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. AnatSci Educ. 2010;3:83–93.

2. Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: a case for medical imaging and vertical integration. AnatSci Educ. 2014;7:251-61. doi: 10.1002/ase.1401.

3. Vorstenbosch MA, Kooloos JG, Bolhuis SM, Laan RF . An investigation of anatomical competence in junior medical doctors. AnatSci Educ. 2016;9:8–17. doi: 10.1002/ase.1513.

4. Louw G, Eizenberg N, Carmichael SW. Points of anatomy in medical education. Amee Guide, 2009;31: 373-86.

5. Brooks WS, Huitt TW, Killins A. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork. AnatSci Educ. 2015;8(2):95–103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460.

6. Arain NN, Cowan M, Assale TS, Assi AH, Albar RA, Ganguly PK. Student-centered integrated anatomy resource sessions at Alfaisal University. AnatSci Educ. 2010;3(5):272–5. doi: 10.1002/ase.176.

7. Leddy JJ, Whelan A, Mindra S, Hughes JDM, El-Bialy S, Ramnanan CJ. Student Perceptions of Independent Versus Facilitated Small Group Learning Approaches to Compressed Medical Anatomy Education. AnatSciEduc. 2015; in press.

8. Klement BJ, Paulsen DF, Wineski LE. Anatomy as Backbone of the Integrated Medical Curriculum First Year: Design and Implementation. AnatSci Educ. 2011;4(3): 157-69.

9. Munawaroh S, Rahayu GR, Suryadi E. Identification of Anatomy Contents for Medical Students Using Delphi Technique. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia. 2017;6(2):98-107.

10. Linstone HA, Turoff M. Delphi survey: method techniques and applications. Read: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

11. Swamy et al. A Delphi consensus study to identify the most prized clinical component of orthopedic anatomy to Teaching medical students. BMC Medical Education. 2014;14:230.

12. Tubbs R, et al. The Development of a core syllabus for the teaching of head and neck anatomy to medical students. Clin. Anat. J, 2014;27(3):321-30.

13. Moxham BJ et al. An Approach Toward the Development of Core Syllabuses for the Anatomical Sciences. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2014;7:302–11.

14. Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J, McHanWell S. Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine: the Delphi process. Journal of Anatomy, 2016;228:2-14.

15. Mackellar A, Ashcroft DM, Bell D, James DH, Marriott J. Identify criteria for pharmacy student rating Ability to communicate with patients. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(3):50.

16. Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchell AWM. Gray's Anatomy for Student. New York: Elsevier; 2014.

17. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur, AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 7th ed. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

18. Paulsen F, Waschke J. Sobotta Atlas of Human Anatomy. 23th ed. Jakarta: EGC; 2012. 19. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphie Technique: Makes Sense of Censensus, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2007;12(10).

20. Miller LE. Determining what could / should be be: Delphi technique and its application. Paper presented at a meeting of the 2006 annual meeting of Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, Ohio; 2006.

21. KKI. Standar Kompetensi Dokter Indonesia (SKDI). 2nd ed. Indonesia: Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia; 2012.

22. Lachman N, Hai SHJJ, Syed FF, Desimone CV, Asirvatham SJ. The Anatomical Basis of ventricular arrhythmias in Normal Heart: What Students Need to Know Anatomy.Clin Anat. 2014;27(6):885-93. doi:10,1002/ ca.22362.

23. Murphy KP, Crush L, O'Malley E, et al. Medical student knowledge regarding radiology before and after a radiological anatomy module: implications for vertical integration and self-directed learning. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:629–34. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0346-0.

24. Lachman N, Pawlina W. Integrating professionalism in early medical education: The theory and application of reflective practice in the anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat. 2006;19:456-60. doi: 10.1002/ca.20344

25. Smith CF, Mathias HS. What is the impact of anatomical education on Clinical practice? ClinAnat, 2011;24:113-9.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.39101

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 261 | views : 249

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

JPKI Stats