Effect of Motivation and Perception of Farmers Response to Sugarcane Management Consolidation Program Plan

Mohamad Cholidi; Irham Irham; Lestari Rahayu Waluyati

doi:10.22146/ae.56150

Effect of Motivation and Perception of Farmers Response to Sugarcane Management Consolidation Program Plan

https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.56150

Mohamad Cholidi^(1*), Irham Irham⁽²⁾, Lestari Rahayu Waluyati⁽³⁾

(1) Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze (1) the difference levels of motivation, perception and behavioral responses of sugar cane farmers with irrigated land and rainfed land to the cane grower management consolidation plan, and (2) the effect of motivation and perception on farmers' behavioral responses related to the cane grower management consolidation plan. The research location was in the sugar factories of PT Perkebunan Nusantara XI. The samples consisting of sugar cane farmers with irrigated land and rainfed land who were randomly selected, amounting to 242 respondents. Novelty of research, there are object and analytical methods. The difference levels of motivation, perceptions and behavioral responses of farmers with irrigated land and rainfed land were analyzed by independent sample t-test. The influence of perception and motivation on the behavioral response of farmers to the cane grower management consolidation plan was analyzed by multiple linear regression. The results showed that, the level of motivation and perceptions of sugar cane farmers there were differences between farmers with irrigated land and rainfed land. Meanwhile, in terms of the response of farmers, there was no significant difference between irrigated land and rainfed land. The influence of motivation, perception, education, dummy variables of Purwodadi and Pradjekan sugar factories significantly influenced farmers' behavioral responses to the cane grower management consolidation plan. To improve the behavioral response of farmers, it is necessary to provide supervision regarding the management of cane grower and the benefits that farmers will obtain from the program to make farmers interested in understanding the objectives of the program.

Keywords

Behavior; Management Consolidation Program; Motivation; Perception; Sugarcane

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adam, M. M. (2016). Persepsi Petani Terhadap Program Kawasan Rumah Pangan Lestari (KRPL) Di Desa Abung Jayo Kecamatan Abung Selatan Kabupaten Lampung Utara. Universitas Lampung Bandar Lampung.

Alamilla-Magaña, J. C., Carrillo-Ávila, E., Obrador-Olán, J. J., Landeros-Sánchez, C., Vera-Lopez, J., & Juárez-López, J. F. (2016). Soil moisture tension effect on sugar cane growth and yield. Agricultural Water Management, 177(September 2019), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.004

Aprilia. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Pembelian Online Pada Mahasiswa Yogyakarta (Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309346882

Ardiyansyah, B., & Purwono. (2015). Mempelajari Pertumbuhan dan Produktivitas Tebu (Saccharum Officinarum. L) dengan Masa Tanam Sama pada Tipologi Lahan Berbeda. Bul. Agrohorti, 3(3), 357–365.

Budianto, H. (2016). Respon anggota kelompok tani terhadap program pengembangan usaha agribisnis perdesaan (PUAP) Di Kecamatan Kebun Tebu Kabupaten Lampung Barat. Universitas Lampung.

Caulton, J. (2012). The development and use of the theory of erg: A literature review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 5(1), 2–8.

Eddy, B. T., Roessali, W., & Marzuki, S. (2012). Dairy cattle farmers’ behaviour and factors affecting the effort to enhance the economic of scale at Getasan District, Semarang Regency. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 37(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.37.1.34-40

Ekawati, M. P. (2013). Analisis Kepuasan Petani Tebu Mitra Terhadap Kemitraan Dengan PG Pakis Baru. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Gunawan, S. (2015). The Impact of Motivation, Perception and Attitude toward Consumer Purchasing Decision: A Study Case of Surabaya and Jakarta Society on Carl’s Junior. IBuss Management, 3(2), 154–163. Retrieved from http://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/ibm/article/view/3720/3388

Handoko, T. H. (2003). Manajemen Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Indrawijaya, A. I. (2010). Teori, Perilaku, dan Budaya Organisasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Irham. (2018). Pentingnya Program Konsolidasi Pengelolaan Tebu Rakyat. In Irham, A. Nurhayati, M. Cholidi, & Daniyanto (Eds.), Peluang Peningkatan Produksi Gula dan Pendapatan Petani melalui Program Konsolidasi Pengelolaan Tebu Rakyat (pp. 1–12). Yogyakarta: Phoenix.

Irsa, R., Nikmatullah, D., & Rangga, K. K. (2018). Persepsi Petani Dan Efektivitas Kelompok Tani Dalam Program Upsus Pajale Di Kecamatan Banjar Baru Kabupaten Tulang Bawang. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v6i1.1-8

Liu, J., Basnayake, J., Jackson, P. A., Chen, X., Zhao, J., Zhao, P., … Fan, Y. (2016). Growth and yield of sugar cane genotypes are strongly correlated across irrigated and rainfed environments. Field Crops Research, 196(March 2018), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.022

Novia, R. A. (2011). Respon Petani Terhadap Kegiatan Sekolah Lapangan Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (SLPTT) Di Kecamatan Ajibarang Kabupaten Banyumas. MEDIAGRO, 7(2), 48–60.

Rozalina, & Tusiah. (2015). Faktor - faktor yang mempengaruhi respon petani terhadap penggunaan mesin perontok (power thresher) padi (Oryza sativa, L) Di Kecamatan Peunaron Kabupaten Aceh Timur. Agrisamudra, 2(1), 31–40.

Rukka, H., & Wahab, A. (2013). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Petani Dalam Pelaksanaan Kegiatan P2bn Di Kecamatan Barru, Kabupaten Barru. Jurnal Agrisistem, 9(1), 46–56.

Safitri, R. (2013). Respons Penyuluh Pertanian Terhadap Materi Penyuluhan Pada Website Cyber Extension Di Kabupaten Bantul. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Saleem, M. F., Ghaffar, A., Anjum, S. A., Cheema, M. A., & Bilal, M. F. (2012). Effect of Nitrogen on Growth and Yield of Sugar cane. Journal American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 32, 75–93.

Siregar, J. (2017). Persepsi dan Respon Petani Terhadap Pelaksanaan Program Asuransi Usahatani Padi Di Kelurahan Sedayu Kecamatan Turen Kabupaten Malang. Universitas Brawijaya.

Subiyanto, S. (2014). Analisis Efektifitas Mesin/Alat Pabrik Gula Menggunakan Metode Overall Equipments Effectiveness. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 16(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.16.1.43-52

Suwarto, Suwarto, & Anantanyu, S. (2012). Model Partisipasi Petani Lahan Kering Dalam Konservasi Lahan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 13(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v13i2.170

Tambo, J. A., & Wünscher, T. (2017). Farmer-led innovations and rural household welfare: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2017.08.018

Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 820–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148

Widyawati, W. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya dan Pendapatan Usahatani Tebu Sistem Tanam Rawat Ratoon Pada Lahan Sawah dan Lahan Tegal Di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis (JEPA), 2(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2018.002.02.3

Wijayanti, A., Subejo, S., & Harsoyo, H. (2016). Respons Petani Terhadap Inovasi Budidaya Dan Pemanfaatan Sorgum Di Kecamatan Srandakan Kabupaten Bantul. Agro Ekonomi, 26(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.22146/agroekonomi.17270

Wirawan, F., & Rahardja, E. (2015). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan (studi pada PT Warna Alam Indonesia). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 4(71), 1–12. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/isoshum/PI/article/view/227/222, diakses 2 September 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.56150