The Role of the Concept of Agape in Improving Aristotle’s Ethics

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.82115

Silvia Maudy Rakhmawati(1*)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research attempted to solve a fundamental philosophical problem in Aristotle's ethics, which was considered insufficient to provide an explanation of what principles must be obeyed by agents of virtue to determine morally right actions. Therefore, this research was conducted to analyze the role of the concept agape in improving Aristotle’s ethics, and its relevance to well-being. This research method was literature-based qualitative research. The research type applied was descriptive of the expert’s thoughts. The agape concept in this study was independent of metaphysical and theological orientations. The concept of agape in this discussion did not refer to God but was directed to the realm of virtue. The high moral value on which agape is based is rationality. Morally right action is an action that emanates from virtue, which is shaped by the purpose of love and wisely carried out in a relational context using practical reason involving situational and consequence considerations. The essential role of agape in virtue is as a constituent of well-being. What one brings to life becomes one’s own life, in line with Aristotle's classical notion that virtue contributes to eudaimonia.


Keywords


Aristotle, Virtue Ethics, Agape, Well-Being

Full Text:

PDF


References

Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans). Benziger Bros.

Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

Bakker, A., & Zubair, A. C. (1990). Metodologi penelitian filsafat. Kanisius.

Dimmock, M., & Fisher, A. (2017). Ethics for A-level. Open Book Publishers.

Fowers, B. J., Carroll, J. S., Leonhardt, N. D., & Cokelet, B. (2021). The emerging science of virtue. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(1), 118–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620924473

Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Love 2.0: Creating happiness and health in moments of connection. Penguin Group.

Kahana, E., Bhatta, T. R., Kahana, B., & Lekhak, N. (2021). Loving others: The impact of compassionate love on later-life psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), 391–402. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa188

Kanary, J. (2020). Transforming friendship: Thomas Aquinas on charity as friendship with God. Irish Theological Quarterly, 85(4), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021140020948350

Mason, E. (1999). Do consequentialists have one thought too many? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009998927955

McMahan, E., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being : evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9698-0

Murdoch, I. (2001). The sovereignty of good. Routledge.

Pasnau, R. (2023). Thomas Aquinas. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Reis, H. T., & Aron, A. (2008). Love: What is it, why does it matter, and how does it operate? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00065.x

Rodriguez, D. J. (2022). Eric J. Silverman, The Supremacy of Love: An Agape‑Centered Vision of Aristotelian Virtue Ethics, (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2019), 165 pages. ISBN: 978‑1‑7936‑0883‑3. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 56(4), 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-020-09788-5

Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395

Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263

Shakespeare, W. (1992). The tragedy of King Lear. Cambridge University Press.

Silverman, E. J. (2019). The supremacy of love: An agape-centered vision of Aristotelian virtue ethics. Lexington Books.

Slote, M. (2003). Morals from motives. Oxford University Press.

Stenberg, J. (2016). Aquinas on happiness. University of Colorado.

Velleman, J. D. (1999). Love as a moral emotion. Ethics, 109(2), 338–374. https://doi.org/10.1086/233898

Williams, B. (1981). Moral luck: Philosophical papers. Cambridge University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.82115

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1156 | views : 1765

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)