To Believe in Historical Progress: On Axel Honneth’s Normative Grounding of Critique

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.73668

Min Seong Kim(1*)

(1) Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


One of the most ambitious contributions Axel Honneth has made to critical theory consists in his attempt to ground the normativity of critique beyond communicative reason—the normative ground of critique that had been proposed by Honneth’s predecessor at the Institut für Sozialforschung, Jürgen Habermas. Defending an affirmative stance toward historical progress is critical to Honneth’s project, which attempts to pursue the aspiration of the Frankfurt School to practice a robust form of immanent critique: for preserving the idea of progress allows Honneth to derive the validity of the underlying normative presuppositions of the existing social order, thereby securing the normative grounds of critique without relying on transcendent or transhistorical principles. Through a consideration of an aspect of the relation between universality and particularity that remains undertheorized in Honneth’s account, this essay attempts to question the success of his strategy for grounding the normativity of critique.


Keywords


Axel Honneth, Frankfurt School, Critical Theory, Normative Ground, Historical Progress

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adorno, T. W. (1990). Negative Dialectics (E. B. Ashton, Trans.). London: Routledge.

Adorno, T. W. (2005a). Marginalia to Theory and Praxis. In H. W. Pickford (Trans.), Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (pp. 259–278). New York: Columbia University Press.

Adorno, T. W. (2005b). Minima Moralia: Reflections on a damaged life (E. Jephcott, Trans.). London: Verso.

Adorno, T. W. (2005c). Progress. In H. W. Pickford (Trans.), Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (pp. 143–160). New York: Columbia University Press.

Allen, A. (2016). The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

Badiou, A. (2002). Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil (P. Hallward, Trans.). London: Verso.

Badiou, A. (2010). The Communist Hypothesis (D. Macey & S. Corcoran, Trans.). London: Verso.

Badiou, A. (2012). The Rebirth of History: Times of Riots and Uprisings (G. Elliott, Trans.). London: Verso.

Bahar, S. (2010). Pancasila, The Living Staatsfundamentalnorm of the Indonesian Nation-State: Norms, Institutions, and Performance. In F. Dhont (Ed.), Pancasila’s Contemporary Appeal: Re-legitimizing Indonesia’s Founding Ethos (pp. 7–46). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans.). New York: Shocken Books.

Bernstein, J. M. (2001). Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourchier, D. (2015). Illiberal Democracy in Indonesia: The Ideology of the Family State. New York: Routledge.

Cook, D. (2007). Adorno, Habermas and the Search for a Rational Society. London: Routledge.

Finlayson, J. G. (2002). Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable. European Journal of Philosophy, 10(1), 1–25.

Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution Or Recognition?: A Political-philosophical Exchange (J. Golb, C. Wilke, & J. Ingram, Trans.). London: Verso.

Freyenhagen, F. (2013). Adorno’s Practical Philosophy: Living Less Wrongly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.

Hammer, E. (2006). Adorno and the Political. London: Routledge.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holden, T. (2020). Normative reconstruction and social memory: Honneth and Ricoeur. Continental Philosophy Review, 53(2), 157–181. doi: 10.1007/s11007-020-09486-w

Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.

Honneth, A. (2007). The Irreducibility of Progress: Kant’s Account of the Relationship between Morality and History (R. Sinnerbrink & J.-P. Deranty, Trans.). Critical Horizons, 8(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1558/crit.v8i1.1

Honneth, A. (2009). Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory (J. Ingram, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (J. Ganahl, Trans.). Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.

Honneth, A. (2017). The Idea of Socialism: Towards a Renewal (J. Ganahl, Trans.). Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kant, I. (1991). The Contest of Faculties. In H. S. Reiss (Ed.), Kant: Political Writings (pp. 176–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, M. S. (2018). The Courage to Have Courage. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 101(1), 30–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/soundings.101.1.0030

Kim, M. S. (2022). Pancasila: Its Emptiness, and What That Means for Social Change in Indonesia. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Democracy and Social Transformation, ICON-DEMOST 2021. Presented at the First International Conference on Democracy and Social Transformation, ICON-DEMOST 2021, Semarang, Indonesia. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.15-9-2021.2315563

Krahl, H.-J. (1984). The Political Contradictions in Adorno’s Critical Theory. In J. Marcus & Z. Tar (Eds.), Foundations of the Frankfurt School of Social Research (pp. 307–310). Abingdon: Transaction Publishers.

Laclau, E. (2014). The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

Lyotard, J.-F. (2009). Enthusiasm: The Kantian Critique of History (G. Van Den Abbeele, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Marchart, O. (2007). Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Marchart, O. (2018). Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology After Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Marx, K. (1992). Early Writings (R. Livingstone & G. Benton, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics.

Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.

Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

Oakeshott, M. (1933). Experience and Its Modes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oakeshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in Politics: And Other Essays. London: Methuen.

Rancière, J. (1989). The Nights of Labor: The Workers’ Dream in Nineteenth-Century France (J. Drury, Trans.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Rancière, J. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (J. Rose, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rauscher, F. (2015). Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richter, G., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Who’s Afraid of the Ivory Tower? A Conversation with Theodor W. Adorno (G. Richter, Trans.). Monatshefte, 94(1), 10–23.

Skirke, C. (2020). After Auschwitz. In P. E. Gordon, E. Hammer, & M. Pensky (Eds.), A Companion to Adorno (pp. 567–582). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

Soekarnoputri, M. (2021). The Establishment of Pancasila as the Grounding Principles of Indonesia. Jurnal Pertahanan, 7(1), 122–136. doi: 10.33172/jp.v7i1.1206

Sonderegger, R. (2021). Truthful Hope. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 41(2), 53–54. doi: 10.21827/krisis.41.2.38239

Stahl, T. (2013). Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique. Constellations, 20(4), 533–552. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12057

The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. (2008). The Adequacy of Representation in Capital Cases: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Second Session, April 8, 2008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Ulum, M. B., & Hamida, N. A. (2018). Revisiting Liberal Democracy and Asian Values in Contemporary Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 4(1), 111–130. doi: 10.31078/consrev415

Žižek, S. (2006). The Parallax View. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Žižek, S. (2009). In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.73668

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 854 | views : 611

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)