Date Log
Submitted
Sep 26, 2023
Accepted
Apr 1, 2024
Published
Aug 15, 2024
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Economic Benefit of Gunung Merapi National Park for the Welfare of the Buffer Village Community
Corresponding Author(s) : Nurani Dwi Harjanti
nurani.dwih@gmail.com
Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan,
Vol 18 No 2 (2024): September
Abstract
Gunung Merapi National Park (GMNP) is an inseparable conservation area from the surrounding community, as the buffer village community has used its existing forest resources. Therefore, this research aimed to identify the forest resources used by the buffer village community and assess the economic benefit value generated by GMNP. The economic benefits evaluation adopted the direct use value approach and market prices. The results showed that the community used water, firewood, grass, land, and sand. Utilization was conducted in utilization, traditional, and rehabilitation zones. These resource utilizations generated a value of IDR426,230,560,828/year, significantly contributing to the welfare of the buffer village community.
Keywords
Gunung Merapi National Park
forest resources
direct use value
market price
buffer village community
Dwi Harjanti, N., Permadi, D. B., Andayani, W., & Atmojo, T. (2024). The Economic Benefit of Gunung Merapi National Park for the Welfare of the Buffer Village Community. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 18(2), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v18i2.8693
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
- Atmojo T, Umaya R, Santosa IB, Tyastuti DP, Primandaru K. 2018. Desa Mawa Cara Negara Mawa Tata. BTNGM, Yogyakarta.
- Ayenew B. 2015. Economic Valuation of Forest Ecosystems Services Role in Maintaining and Improving Water Quality. Economics4:71.
- Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P. 2006. Using Economic Valuation Techniques to Inform Water Resources Management: A Survey and Critical Appraisal of Available Techniques and an Application. Science of theTotal Environment 365:105122.
- BPPTKG. 2023. Aktivitas Gunung Merapi Terkini 11 Maret 2023. Available from https://bpptkg.esdm.go.id/pub/ page.php?idx=659.
- BTNGM. 2022a. Laporan Kinerja Balai Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi Tahun 2021. BTNGM, Yogyakarta.
- BTNGM. 2022b. Laporan Statistik Balai Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi Tahun 2021.
- BTNGM. 2018. Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Hutan Taman Nasional Gunung Merbabu, Jawa Tengah:191.
- Desriani J, Putro T, Iyan R. 2017. Nilai Ekonomi Ekowisata Taman Nasional Tesso Nilo dengan Pendekatan Metode Contingent Valuation Dikecamatan Ukui Kabupaten Pelalawan. JOM Fekon4:11751189.
- Faida LRW, Susanto D, Wianti KF, Anggoro MD, Putri M. 2021. Community Interactions in Sand Utilization within Mount Merapi National Park. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 19:525530.
- Gunawan H, Bismark M, Haruni Krisnawati Pusat Litbang Konservasi dan Rehabilitasi Jl Gunung A. 2013. Kajian Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Sekitar Sebagai Dasar Penetapan Tipe Penyangga Taman Nasional Gunung Merbabu, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam 10:103119.
- Malik A, Fensholt R, Mertz O. 2015. Economic valuation of Mangroves for comparison with commercial aquaculture in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forests 6:30283044.
- OECD. 2002. Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation A Guide for Policy Makers (Complete Edition - ISBN 9264197311). Source OECD Environment & Sustainable Development 2002:1153.
- Pearce D, Atkinson G, Mourato S. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysisand theEnvironment. OECD, Paris.
- Pearce D, Moran D. 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. Earthscan, London.
- Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 tahun 2012 tentang Panduan Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Hutan. 2012. Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 tahun 2012 tentang Panduan Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Hutan.
- Rogers CD, Pearce D, Moran D. 1995. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. The Journal of Applied Ecology 32:672.
- Roscoe. 1982. Research Methods For Business. Mc Graw Hill, NewYork.
- Roslinda E. 2019. Economic Valuation of the Danau Sentarum National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20:19831989.
- Roslinda E, Yuliantini. 2014. The Economic Value of Hydrological Services in Mendalam Sub Watershed, Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research 1:18.
- Steiner A, McCormick SJ, Johnson I. 2004. How Much Ecosystem is an Worth? How Much Assessing the Economic Value of Conservation. 4 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK, Washington, DC.
- Sugiyono. 2019. Statistik untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta, Bandung.
- Suharti S. 2015. Pemanfaatan Tumbuhan Bawah di Zona Pemanfaatan Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi oleh Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan. Pages 14111415.
- Sulfiantono A, Gunawan, Budhami PD, Nastiti P, Anifah N. 2012. Buku Informasi Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Sekitar KawasanTNGM. BTNGM, Yogyakarta.
- Tolera T. 2022. The economic valuation of Gedo Natural Forest conservation benefits, Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 11. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Umaya R, Hardjanto, Soekmadi R, Sunito S. 2020. Direct Economic Benefits and Human Dependence Toward Gunung Merapi National Park, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21:982993.
- Wijayati D, Rijanta R. 2019. Evaluasi Zonasi Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan 3:15