This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Relationship between Landscape Visual Quality and Level of Visitor Experience in Kalibiru Nature Tourism Object, Kulon Progo Regency
Corresponding Author(s) : Retno Nur Utami
Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan,
Vol 15 No 2 (2021): September
Abstract
The number of visitors to Kalibiru Nature Tourism Object in Kulon Progo Regency during weekends has exceeded its effective carrying capacity. Distributing the visitors on weekdays could become one of the solutions to prevent ecological damage. This research aimed at better understanding the relationship between visual landscape quality and the level of visitors’ experience in Kalibiru Nature Tourism Object, Kulon Progo Regency. Two independent surveys were conducted, one during the weekdays' dan another one during the weekends in which 100 respondents were randomly selected for each survey. This research employed descriptive analysis, t-test for independent samples, and simple linear regression. The results showed that there is no significant difference between the average score of landscape visual quality between weekdays (score 75.44) and weekends (score 78.01). Similarly, there is also no significant difference between the level of visitors’ experience during weekdays (score 78.09) and weekends (80.34). The simple linear regression analysis indicated that the landscape visual quality has a positive influence on the level of visitors’ experience in both categories.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Aditya, Nicholas R. 2020. Lima desa wisata Bali yang jadi favorit turis asing. https://travel.kompas.com/read/2020/09/01/091000027/5-desa-wisata-bali-yang-jadi-favorit-turis-asing?page=all Diakses 25 Maret 2021.
- Arumsari K. 2017. Daya dukung obyek wisata alam Kalibiru, Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Skripsi (Tidak dipublikasikan). Fakultas Kehutanan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
- Bagit R, Sambiran S, Kairupan J. 2017. Evaluasi program kerja dalam pengembangan pariwisata Pantai Pasir Putih Maelang. Jurnal Eksekutif, 1(1).
- CMLI Tinkler, C. 2016. Tables of criteria and matrices for landscape assessment (LSCA & LVIA). Environmental, Landscape and Colour Consultancy. Worcestershire. UK. http:wellingtonheathpc.org/wp.content/uploads/2016/11/APPENDIX-C-Assessment-Criteria.pdf. Diakses 10 Maret 2021.
- Çoban S. 2012. the effects of the image of destination on tourist satisfaction and loyality: The case of Cappadocia. European Journal of Social Science, 29(2).
- Damanik J, Weber H. 2006. Perencanaan ekowisata dari teori ke aplikasi. PUSPAR UGM, Yogyakarta.
- Daniel TC. 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
- Ghozali I. 2001. Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
- Goeldner CR, Ritchie JRB. 2012. Tourism: priciples, practices, philosophies. (12th Ed.) John Willey & Sons, New Jersey.
- Herbst H, Förster M, Kleinschmit B. 2009. Contribution of landscape metrics to the assessment of scenic quality – the example of the landscape structure plan Havelland/Germany. Lanscape Online 10: 1-17. DOI: 10.3097/LO 200910.
- Hill N. 1996. Handbook of customer satisfaction measurement. Gower Publishing Limited, England.
- Kim JH. 2010. Determining the factors affecting the memorable nature of travel experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 27(8):780–796.
- Larsen S. 2007. Aspects of a psychology of the tourist experience. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 7(1):7–18.
- Mathieson A, Wall G. 1986. Tourism: economics, physical and social impacts. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
- Plog S. 2001. Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity: An update of a cornell quarterly classic. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 42(3):13–24.
- Polat A. 2015. Visual quality assessment in landscape architecture. 19th International Academic Conference. Florence, Italy.
- Putri V. 2018. Pengelolaan hutan kalibiru dalam rangka pelestarian hutan dan peningkatan ekonomi lokal. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
- Raharja I. 2017. Kepuasan pengunjung di obyek wisata alam kalibiru, kabupaten kulonprogo. Skripsi (Tidak dipublikasikan). Fakultas Kehutanan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
- Setiadi N. 2003. Perilaku konsumen. Edisi 1. PT Kharisma Putra Utama, Jakarta.
- Silalahi U. 2015. Metode penelitian sosial kuantitatif. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
- Tung, Ritchie. 2011 .Exploring the essence of memorable tourism experiences. Annals of Tourism Research 38(4):1367-1386.
- USDA (United State Forest Service Department of Agriculture). 1995. Landscape aesthetics: A handbook for scenery management. Handbook Number 701. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service.
- Utami R, Kusumandari A. 2017. Analisis daya dukung kawasan wisata alam pada dua destinasi wisata alam di Provinsi DIY. Laporan Akhir Penelitian DPP, Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas, Gadjah Mada.
- Utari W, Avenzora D, Sunarminto R, Tutut. 2014. Daya dukung ekologis dan psikologis ekowisata di Kebun Raya Cibodas. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/73030.-.
- Yusof N, Rahman F. 2011. Tourists’ perceptions of service quality in a lake_based tourism Area. International Conference on Business and Economics Research. IPEDR Vol. 16 (2011). IACSIT Press, Singapore.