Review Process

This journal is committed to peer-review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review. It operates a double anonymized review process in which both author(s) and reviewers are anonymous to each other. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. Editors are not involved in decisions about papers which they have written themselves or have been written by others that they may have conflicting interests.