Arsip sebagai kendali intelektualitas dalam proses produksi pengetahuan
Abstract
Introduction. Archives are not only seen as a product but also as a process to produce knowledge particularly, through interdisciplinary collaborations in the era of postmodernisme. The postmodernism perspective may influence the interpretation of archives which leads to archival discourse. This study aims to investigate the postmodernism perspective of archives in the knowledge production process in a more impartial and democratic way.
Data Collection Methods. This study used a qualitative approach through literature study.
Results and Discussion. The postmodernism perspective has opened up new viewpoints on the role and function of archives in the knowledge production process for searching and reading archives in a more diverse manner. In this study, several discussed archives were related to human rights, community engagement, accountability, and power relations, as well as social and transitional justice. The postmodernism perspective of archives as intellectual control in the production of knowledge through interdisciplinary collaboration and as one of the sustainable international projects may establish intellectual networks between countries.
Conclusion. The postmodernism perspective has provoked new ideas and expanded the discourse on archives needed in the development of the archival field. Archivists as well as historians play a new role as users of archives who have a responsibility in intellectual control to write democratic historical narratives.
References
Akarapattananukul, Y. (2019). Archive and the postmodern perspectives. Journal of Social Sciences Naresuan University, 10(1), 79–91. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jssnu/article/view/211005
Asmiyanto, T. (2019). Metamorphosis of archivists in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges in facing the digital revolution. Record and Library Journal, 5(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V5-I1.2019.12-21
Bastian, J. A. (2017). Memory research/ archival research. In A. J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish & A. J. Lau (eds.), Research in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 269-287). Monash University Publishing
Bramantya, A. R., Waluyo, Darajat, I. R., Mulya, L., & Ridwan, A. N. (2021). Engaging students in oral history in the Archival Science Study Program, Vocational College, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Journal of Archival Organization, 18(3-4), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2022.2110551
Bramantya, A. R. (2020). Peran pendidikan kearsipan dalam menghidupkan arsip dan kehidupan sosial. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 16(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i1.280
Bramantya, A. R. (2017). Arsip dan jaringan intelektual: Studi tentang koleksi Nishijima di Universitas Waseda Jepang. Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan, 10(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.22146/khazanah.24746
Budianta, E. (2022). Membaca Mona Lohanda. In D. Trisnawati, Y. Wirawan, M. Fauzi, A. Achdian, & Wilson (eds.), Arsip dan sejarah: Mengenang Mona Lohanda (pp. 227-233). Pustaka Pias.
Bush, B., & Purvis, J. (2016.) Connecting women's histories: The local and the global. Women's History Review, 25(4), 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2015.1114316
Carey, P. (2021). Mona Lohanda (1947-2021) remembered: Humble gatekeeper of the Indonesian National Archives, historian of the Batavian Chinese and true daughter of Tangerang. Archipel, 102, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.2612
Cook, T. (2013). Evidence, memory, identity, and community: Four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science, 13(2-3), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
Custer, T. (2014). A historiographical analysis of digital history. Historia, 23, 95-99. https://www.eiu.edu/historia/Custer2014.pdf
Domanska, E. (2015). Hayden White and liberation historiography. Rethinking History, 19(4), 640-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2014.959361
Fadillah, K.N. (2014). Postmodernisme dalam kearsipan. Jurnal Kearsipan, 9(1), 59-78. https://jurnalkearsipan.anri.go.id/index.php/ojs/article/view/80
Farrell, M., Gordijn, B., & Kearns, A.J. (2023). Accountability, human rights and social justice in public sector recordkeeping. Archival Science, 23(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09403-5
Faturahmi, N. I. (2020). Peran lembaga informasi dalam era post-truth. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 16(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v16i2.101
Gattey, E. (2021). Global histories of empire and climate in the Anthropocene. History Compass, 19(8), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12683
Gauld, C. (2017). Democratising or privileging: The democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science, 17(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4
Gilliland, A., & McKemmish, S. (2014). The role of participatory archives in furthering human rights, reconciliation and recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice, 24, 78–88.
Gordon, A. A. (2014). Eurocentric archival knowledge production and decolonizing archival theory [PhD thesis, York University]. YorkSpace Repository. https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/xmlui/handle/10315/29935
Katelaar, E. (2017). Archival turns and returns, studies of the archive. In A. J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish & A. J. Lau (eds.), Research in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 228-268). Monash University Publishing
Kurasawa, A., & Nanke, M. (2018). Bibliografi beranotasi sumber sejarah masa pendudukan Jepang di Indonesia. Direktorat Sejarah Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Lustig, J. (2020) Epistemologies of the archive: Toward a critique of archival reason. Archival Science, 20(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09313-z
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2020). The literature review: Six steps to success fourth edition. Corwin.
Manurung, R. U., & Rohmiyati, Y. (2019). Kontribusi arsip seni bagi pengembangan profesi seniman di Indonesian Visual Art Archive (IVAA) Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 8(3), 49-58. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/26822
Mitrović, B. (2015). Historical understanding and historical interpretation as contextualization. History and Theory, 54(3), 311–332. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24543144
Namhila, E.N. (2016). Content and use of colonial archives: An under-researched issue. Archival Science, 16(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9234-0
Peirson-Smith, A., & Peirson-Smith, B. (2020). Fashion archive fervour: The critical role of fashion archives in preserving, curating, and narrating fashion. Archives and Records, 41(3), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2020.1813556
Pratama, R. (2020). Archiving historical data: Three criticisms for the reliability of digital sources. Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan, 8(2), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v8cf2
Putra, P. (2021). Prinsip demokratisasi arsip: Suatu konsep untuk menjembatani antara kearsipan, penulisan sejarah, dan pascamodernisme. Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan, 14(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.22146/khazanah.56741
Raina, D. (2020). A history of circulation vs. an ‘episodic’ history of mathematics in south asia: titrating the historiography and social theory of science and mathematics. In J. Feichtinger, A. Bhatti, C. Hülmbauer (eds.), How to write the global history of knowledge-making interaction, circulation and the transgression of cultural difference (pp. 107-127). Springer Nature.
Suprayitno. (2017, December). Konsep arsip menurut Foucault dan Derrida dalam perspektif semiotik: Tantangan bagi arsiparis [Paper presentation]. In International Seminar of Archives: Development of Archival Science and Archives Management in Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (pp. 29-52). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Suwignyo, A., Schrikker, A., & Legêne, S. (2021). How generations matter: BMGN and the problem of writing histories of colonialism. BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review, 136(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.9942
Szekely, I. (2017). Do archives have a future in the digital age?. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies, 4(1), 1–14. http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol4/iss2/1
Uljaeva, S., Rakhmonberdieva, N., Kuyliev, T., Rakhmonov, B., & Yunusova, N. (2020). Digital humanities and their importance in studying the history of Uzbekistan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 1022-1027. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24SP1/PR201249
van Beurden, J. (2017). Treasures in trusted hands: Negotiating the future of colonial cultural objects. Sidestone Press.
Viebach, J. (2021). Transitional archives: Towards a conceptualisation of archives in transitional justice. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(3), 403-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1811693
Wakimoto, D.K., Bruce, C. & Partridge, H. (2013). Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science, 13(4), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
Copyright (c) 2023 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
