COVID-19 research spread in Indonesia on social media
Abstract
Introduction. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Indonesian COVID-19 research. One of them is productive author, productive citations, the most popular social media to disseminate research results, the most popular articles on social media, mapping or distribution of research results visualization, and the correlation of social media data with citations.
Data Collection Method. The research data was taken from the Scopus database and this research use method Bibliometric, Altmetric, Scientometric, and linear regression tests.
Data Analysis. The data of the study was analyzed using program (altmetric.com), VOSViewer and SPSS software.
Result and Discussion. Pranata, R. was the productive author in producing Indonesian COVID-19 research. The University of Indonesia is the most productive institution. The study "Clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis" received the most citations and shares on social media. Mendeley is the most popular social media platform for disseminating research.
Conclusion. Based on the above findings, the spread of COVID-19 research in Indonesia on the most popular social media is mendeley 17.701, followed by Twitter 2.971 and news mentions 177. According to linear regression tests, mendeley is social media platform with a high correlation value of 0.814.
References
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8
Aljohani, N. R., Fayoumi, A., & Hassan, S. U. (2020). Bot prediction on social networks of Twitter in altmetrics using deep graph convolutional networks. Soft Computing, 24(15), 11109–11120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04689-y
Allahbadia, G. N. (2014). Thinking beyond the Thomson Reuters “impact factor.” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 64(4), 231–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0574-8
Borgatti, S. P. (2012). Social network analysis, two-mode concepts in. In Computational Complexity (pp. 2912–2924). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1800-9_179
Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research ? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics. Online Information Review, 40(4), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2015-0314
Butler, J. S., Kaye, I. D., Sebastian, A. S., Wagner, S. C., Morrissey, P. B., Schroeder, G. D., Kepler, C. K., & Vaccaro, A. R. (2017). The evolution of current research impact metrics. Clinical Spine Surgery, 30(5), 226–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000531
Chamberlain, S. (2013). Consuming article-level metrics: Observations and lessons. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.02
Cho, J. (2017). A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetrics. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0005
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Ezema, I. J., & Ugwu, C. I. (2019). Correlating research impact of library and information science journals using citation counts and altmetrics attention. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2018-0029
González-Alcaide, G., Salinas, A., & Ramos, J. M. (2018). Scientometrics analysis of research activity and collaboration patterns in Chagas cardiomyopathy. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 12(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006602
Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2016). Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS ONE, 11(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2013). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 1, 468–483. http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7300
Ibrahim, C., Sitanggang, I. S., & Sukoco, H. (2019). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap sitasi publikasi internasional karya ilmiah Indonesia bidang pertanian dengan pendekatan altmetrics. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 40(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v40i1.456
Lamba, M., Kashyap, N., & Madhusudhan, M. (2021). Research evaluation of computer science publications using Altmetrics: a cohort study of Indian Central Universities. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(4/5), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-07-2020-0097
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002
Ngadi, N., Meliana, R., & Purba, Y. A. (2020). Dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap PHK dan pendapatan pekerja di Indonesia. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 15(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.14203/jki.v0i0.576
Nugroho, A. E. (2020). Survey on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Indonesian Household Economy | Indonesian Institute of Sciences
Onyancha, O. B. (2017). Altmetrics of South African Journals: Implications for scholarly impact of South African Research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9485-0
Ouchi, A., Saberi, M. K., Ansari, N., Hashempour, L., & Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A. (2019). Do altmetrics correlate with citations? A study based on the 1,000 most-cited articles. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2019-0050
Pham, T., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Tourism-induced poverty impacts of COVID-19 in Indonesia. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 3(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2022.100069
Shrivastava, R., & Mahajan, P. (2016). Relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readership metrics: A case of top 100 cited papers in Physics Rishabh. New Library World, 117(3/4), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-09-2015-0064
Talmale, M. S., & Singh, S. N. (2015). Web-based information resources on scientometrics: A study. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 5(4), 244–253.
Tang, Y., Tseng, H., & Vann, C. (2020). Unwrap citation count, altmetric attention score and mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8–9), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2020-0005
Tella, A., & Olabooye, A. A. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science from 2000-2012. Library Review, 63(4/5), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07-2013-0094
Uluyol, B., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Lanzalonga, F. (2021). Mapping waqf research: A thirty-year bibliometric analysis. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(5), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2021-0031/FULL/XML
Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., Van Eck, N. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Van Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419–2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708
Copyright (c) 2022 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
