Factors influencing students’ information channel preferences in finding sources for their final academic reports
Abstract
Introduction. Understanding students' information channel preferences for information sources in academic tasks is crucial for improving library services. This study identifies factors influencing these preferences.
Data Collection Methods. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 26 final-year students working on their theses, focusing on their selection of information channels.
Data Analysis. The interview results were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Recurring themes were identified and categorized based on participants' responses, revealing common preferences for information sources.
Results and Discussion. This study found that factors influencing the choice of information sources include the convenience, quantity, and quality of information sources provided by different channels. Additionally, users’ intentions, such as the need to obtain specific types of academic sources or the desire to personally own the acquired sources, also play a significant role. Therefore, academic libraries should ensure that their services are created, maintained, and developed based on users' experiences with existing library services to better meet their academic information needs and support them in completing their academic tasks.
Conclusion. In today's academic world, students have diverse preferences for where they find information. Some lean towards the library, while others prefer the internet, especially for their final projects. Interestingly, some see both as useful for their research.
References
Aharony, N. (2016). Information literacy in the professional literature: An exploratory analysis. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 62(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531011046907
Almaghaslah, D., & Alsayari, A. (2022). Academic help-seeking behaviours of undergraduate pharmacy students in Saudi Arabia: Usage and helpfulness of resources. Healthcare (Switzerland), 10(7), 1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071264
Chohda, N., & Kumar, S. (2023). Print vs. electronic resources: Influence of demographical characteristics of undergraduates on preferences and choices under diverse circumstances. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 24(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2022-0016
Clark, J. C. (2015). Library as place: What students value in a performing arts library. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 18(3–4), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2015.1093882
Connaway, L. S., Lanclos, D., & Hood, E. M. (2015). “ I find google a lot easier than going to the library website .” Imagine ways to innovate and inspire students to use the academic library. Association of College & Research Libraries, 289–300. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2013/papers/Connaway_Google.pdf
Dennen, V., Bagdy, L., & Park, Y. (2021). Developing informed citizens: Exploring University Students’ news consumption habits, beliefs, and related information skills. In Kommers, P.; Isaias, P. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on the E-Society (pp. 151-158). https://doi.org/10.33965/es2021_202101l019
Dreisiebner, S., Polzer, A. K., Robinson, L., Libbrecht, P., Boté-Vericad, J. J., Urbano, C., Mandl, T., Vilar, P., Žumer, M., Juric, M., Pehar, F., & Stričević, I. (2021). Facilitation of information literacy through a multilingual MOOC considering cultural aspects. Journal of Documentation, 77(3), 777–797. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2020-0099
Folk, A. L. (2021). Exploring the development of undergraduate students’ information literacy through their experiences with research assignments. College and Research Libraries, 82(7), 1035–1055. https://doi.org/10.5860/CRL.82.7.1035
Gkorezis, P., Kostagiolas, P., & Niakas, D. (2017). Linking exploration to academic performance: The role of information seeking and academic self-efficacy. Library Management, 38(8–9), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-02-2017-0021
González-Pérez, L. I., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & Garciá-Penãlvo, F. J. (2020). User experience in institutional repositories: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 9(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2018010105
Gunasekera, C., Alahakoon, C., & Dissanayake, H. (2021). E-resource usage of undergraduate students at Universityof Peradeniya: A user survey. Sri Lanka Library Review, 35(2), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.4038/sllr.v35i2.45
Heriyanto, H. (2020). Preferensi penggunaan sumber informasi oleh mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan tugas kuliah. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 8(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v8i1.23440
Hertzum, M. (2014). Expertise seeking: A review. Information Processing and Management, 50(5), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.04.003
Idiegbeyan-Ose, J., Ifijeh, G., Aregbesola, A., Owolabi, S., & Toluwani, E. (2019). E-resources vs prints: Usages and preferences by undergraduates in a private university, Nigeria. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13885
Javed, K. (2015). Use of information sources and need of information literacy among students in Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 7(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.5897/ijlis2014.0447
Johnson, Frances; Rowley, Jennifer; Sbaffi, L. (2015). Exploring information interactions in the context of google. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 824–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Johnston, N., & Salaz, A. M. (2019). Exploring the reasons why university students prefer print over digital texts: An Australian perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(2), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2019.1587858
Kim, J. A. (2016). Dimensions of user perception of academic library as place. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.013
Luca, E., & Narayan, B. (2016). Redesigning the open-access institutional repository: A user experience approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10075 LNCS, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_33
Mahmood, K., & Richardson, J. V. (2014). Impact of web 2.0 technologies on academic libraries: A survey of ARL libraries. Electronic Library, 31(4), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2011-0068
Mclaughlin, J. E. (2015). Focus on user experience: Moving from a library-centric point of view. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 20(1–2), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2015.1064845
Mole, A. (2017). Assessment of academic utilization of online information. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 7(29), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2017.7.3.029
Mungwabi, H. N. (2019). The effectiveness of library information literacy instructions given to undergraduate students at the University of Dar es Salaam. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 14(2), 99–112.
O’Neill, B. (2022). Do they know it when they see it?: Natural language preferences of undergraduate students for library resources. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 28(2), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2021.1920535
Oliveira, S. M. (2017). The academic library’s role in student retention: a review of the literature. Library Review, 66(4–5), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-12-2016-0102
Park, H., Lee, I. S., Lee, H., & Chae, Y. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of moxibustion research trends over the past 20 years. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051254
Purnell, M., Royal, B., & Warton, L. (2020). Supporting the development of information literacy skills and knowledge in undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 95(2020), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104585
Rosman, T., Mayer, A. K., & Krampen, G. (2016). A longitudinal study on information-seeking knowledge in psychology undergraduates: Exploring the role of information literacy instruction and working memory capacity. Computers and Education, 96(February), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.011
Rowe, J., Leuzinger, J., Hargis, C., & Harker, K. R. (2021). The impact of library instruction on undergraduate student success: A four-year study. College and Research Libraries, 82(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.1.7
Scoulas, J. M., & De Groote, S. L. (2022). Impact of undergraduate students’ library use on their learning beyond GPA: Mixed-methods approach. College and Research Libraries, 83(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.3.452
Sharma, D., Dorji, P., & Wangchuck, N. (2021). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and college libraries in Bhutan for educational achievement: A comparative study. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 17(3), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2021/v17i330421
Soma, C., & Miller, E. (2022). Course materials for uncertain times. Atla Summary of Proceedings, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.31046/proceedings.2022.3165
Soohyung, J., & Namjoo, C. (2015). Factors affecting undergraduates’ selection of online library resources in academic tasks usefulness, ease-of-use, resource quality, and individual differences. Library Hi Tech, 32(2), 272–291.
Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2017). The impact of academic library resources on undergraduates’ degree completion. College and Research Libraries, 78(6), 812–823. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.812
Tang, R., Mehra, B., Du, J. T., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Paradigm shift in the field of information special issue editorial. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(10), 1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24566
Thindwa, T., Chawinga, W. D., & Dube, G. (2019). Information-seeking behaviour of security studies students: A case study. SA Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.1048
Tyler-Wood, T., Smith, D., & Zhang, X. (2023). Providing accessible learning materials for the diverse learner: Equitable learning opportunities provided through school libraries. The IAFOR International Conference on Education – Hawaii 2023 Official Conference Proceedings, 819–829. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2023.67
Wang, Y., Sarkar, S., & Shah, C. (2018). Juggling with information sources, task type, and information quality. CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 2018-March, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176390
Wang, Y., Sarkar, S., & Shah, C. (2017). Investigating information seekers’ selection of interpersonal and impersonal sources. CHIIR 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3022151
Woudstra, Lilian; Bart, Van Den Hooff; Schouten, A. (2015). No title the quality versus accessibility debate revisited: A contingency perspective on human information source selection. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2060–2071. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/asi.23536
Wye, L., Brangan, E., Cameron, A., Gabbay, J., Klein, J. H., & Pope, C. (2015). Evidence based policy making and the “art” of commissioning - How English healthcare commissioners access and use information and academic research in “real life” decision-making: An empirical qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1091-x
Copyright (c) 2024 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
