NEGOTIATION OF IDENTITY IN DIASPORIC LITERATURE: A CASE STUDY ON AMY TAN’S THE HUNDRED SECRET SENSES AND LESLIE MARMON SILKO’S CEREMONY

https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v3i1.47838

Ken Ruri Nindyasmara(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Negotiation of identity has become an important issue because its never-ending process always relates to conflicts, differences and similarities. Chinese Americans and Native Americans are two distinct diasporic communities amongst other ethnic group in the U.S. As minorities, they experience prejudice, discrimination and exclusion from mainstream American culture and society. This research aims to reveal the negotiation of identity of Chinese Americans and Native Americans which is reflected on their literature. Literature is seen as the record of diasporic experience of both ethnic groups. This research is qualitative conducted under Post-Nationalist American Studies. Post-colonial, hegemony and representation theories are used to help the process of data analysis. The primary data is taken from The Hundred Secret Senses written by Amy Tan and Ceremony written by Leslie Marmon Silko. The secondary data are taken from books, journals, and internet sources. The finding of the research shows that Chinese Americans and Native Americans negotiate their identity by choosing or combining competing values. The construction of identity is done through the reenactment of ethnic root and the adaptation to mainstream American cultural values. Sense of belongingness, history and socio-cultural background become the determining factors of identity negotiation. In brief, they construct hybrid identity to survive and to counter American hegemony. Compared to Native Americans, Chinese Americans are more blending to mainstream American culture. However, both novels depict their hybrid identity.

 

Keywords: identity negotiation, diasporic literature, diaspora communities, hegemony, hybrid identity


Full Text:

PDF


References

Ashcroft, Griffiths, Tiffin (Eds.). (1989) The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Postcolonial Literatures, London, UK: Routledge.

Bhabha, H. (1995). The location of culture. London: Routledge. Bowling Green State University Press.

Bishop, A. J. (2003), Western Mathematics: The Secret Weapon of Cultural Imperialism. In B. Ascroft., G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), postcolonial studies reader, (pp. 71-76). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.

Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge.

Chang, I. (2004). The Chinese in America. New York, NY: Penguin Group.

Chou, R. S. & Feagin, J. R. (2014). The myth of the model minority. ISBN

Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural anthropology. 9 (3), 302-338. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/656365.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design. California, CA: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Ghandi. L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction. New South Wales. Australia. Allen & Unwin.

Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. Chicago, IL. The University of Chicago Press.

Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London, UK. British Library Cataloguing Data.

Gramsci, A. (1999). Selection from The Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Kennedy, J. F. (2008). A nation of immigrants. ISBN 0061447544,9780061447549

The U.S.Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity, Community, Culture, Difference (pp.222-237). London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Post-Higgins, K. L. (2013). Financial Whirpools. Oxford: Elsevier, Inc.

Parillo, V. (1985). Stranger to these shores: Race and Ethnic Relations in the United States. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Poter, D. M. (1954). People of Plenty: Economic Abundance and American Character. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Spivak, G. C. (2006). Can the Subaltern Speak. In G. G. Bill Ashcroft (Ed.), The Postcolonial Studies Reader (pp. 24-40). Oxford: Routledge.

Temperly, Bradbury (Eds.). (1998). Introduction to American Studies. London: Longman.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/rubikon.v3i1.47838

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3302 | views : 1722

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

   Crossref Google Scholar JournalStories Main logo  OAI logo  

View My Stats

ISSN & E-ISSN