CONTESTING AMERICAN ACADEMIC HEGEMONY IN THE AUTHOR GUIDELINES OF SINTA JOURNALS: AN ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE, LANGUAGE, AND ACADEMIC TOOLS
Amin Basuki(1*), Ida Rohani Adi(2), Aris Munandar(3)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The dominance of American academic standards has shaped scholarly writing practices worldwide, including in Indonesia. This influence is evident in the adoption of the IMRaD structure, APA citation style, English as the primary language, and reliance on tools such as Turnitin, Grammarly, and reference management software. This article shows how these forms of dominance operate within the author guidelines of Indonesian scholarly journals indexed by SINTA and how local academic actors engage in resistance and negotiation. Drawing on Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony and decolonial perspectives—such as epistemic disobedience (Mignolo), epistemic freedom (Ndlovu-Gatsheni), and ecologies of knowledges (Santos)—the research employs a critical qualitative approach. The data consist of 319 author guidelines from SINTA-accredited journals (levels 1 and 6), analyzed thematically and discursively. The findings show that while many journals conform to American standards, others resist by adopting non-IMRaD structures, alternative citation styles, and Indonesian or Arabic. In addition, local initiatives such as the Garuda portal and institutional repositories provide spaces for resisting epistemic domination. Overall, the article highlights both the persistence of American hegemony and the possibilities for negotiation, contributing to theoretical debates on academic power while offering practical insights for developing more autonomous and context-sensitive academic standards in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalisation and the University: Myths and Realities in an Unequal World. Tertiary Education & Management, 10(3), 3–25.
Altbach, P. G. (2011). The past, present, and future of the research university. In P. G. Altbach & J. Salmi (Eds.), The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities (pp. 11–32). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Canagarajah, A.S. (Ed.). (2005). Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611840
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual Scholars and the Imperative to Publish in English: Negotiating Interests, Demands, and Rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 663–688. doi:10.2307/3588284
Direktorat Penelitian UGM. (2025). Program dan kebijakan publikasi ilmiah. Retrieved April 25, 2025, from Universitas Gadjah Mada: https://penelitian.ugm.ac.id/
Elsevier. (2023, March 9). The lasting language of publication. Retrieved from Elsevier Connect: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/the-lasting-language-of-publication
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Foucault, M. (1978/1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.) New York: VINTAGE BOOKS.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. (E. &. Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith, Trans.) London: Lawrence &Wishart.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural Thought Patterns In Inter-Cultural Education. Language Learning, 16(1-2), 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309. doi:10.1023/A:1014699605875
Marginson, S. (2008). Global field and global imagining: Bourdieu and worldwide higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690801966386
Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2021). Moving beyond centre-periphery science: Towards an ecology of knowledge. Centre for Global Higher Education Working Paper Series, 63, 1–34. Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f139bfcc-1e7b-4fbd-879a-f44732058c21/download_file?safe_filename=Marginson%2520and%2520Xu%2520Moving%2520beyond%2520centre-periphery%2520science.pdf&type_of_work=Working+paper
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7-8), 159–181. doi:10.1177/0263276409349275
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018). Epistemic freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and decolonization. London: Routledge.
Parmar, I. (2012). Foundations of the American century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller foundations in the rise of American power. New York: Columbia University Press.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
Santos, B. d. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. New York: Routledge.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Article Metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








