Perlocutions of 2024 Indonesian General Election: A Cyberpragmatics Perspective
Nur Lailiyah(1*)
(1) Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Studies on cyberpragmatics have revealed that perlocution or an act of speaking for persuasion the meaning of language can no longer be solely interpreted from traditional pragmatic perspectives. This is especially the case in the context of rapid technological advancement. Built on this cyberpragmatics theory on the function of language, this study aims to describe the perlocutions of the 2024 elections on social media from a Cyberpragmatics perspective. Drawing on descriptive qualitative method, this study focuses on the manifestations of perlocution in netizens' comments about the 2024 elections. The research data comprises excerpts of utterances containing manifestations of the 2024 election perlocutions. The substantive data sources for this research are written texts found on social media, specifically from the official cnnidpolitik account in July 2023 with the theme "Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates." Data were collected using the observation method. The techniques employed include recording and note-taking. Prior to data analysis, data validity was ensured through data triangulation. The analytical method applied is extralingual analysis. The technique employed is the comparative linkage analysis, particularly the technique of comparative linkage equalization. This study yields the following findings regarding the perlocutions of the 2024 elections: (1) emphasizing sentiments (directly); (2) emphasizing sentiments (indirectly); (3) building misconceptions; (4) determining choices; (5) determining choices (accompanied by invective); (6) displaying neutrality; (7) satirizing (authorities); (8) satirizing (individuals); and (9) fostering turbulence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2023). Laporan survei penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet di Indonesia tahun 2023. Diakses dari https://www.apjii.or.id.
Díaz-Pérez, F. J. (2013). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context by Francisco Yus. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013: New Domains and Methodologies (pp. 279-283). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Negative Impoliteness and Reconstruction of Identity : Cyberpragmatics Analysis of Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Arab Youtube Channel. Jurnal ARBITRER, 8(2), 168–179.
Gonggor, K. S., & Margareta, K. M. (2021). ANALISIS JENIS TINDAK TUTUR PENGHINAAN DAN PEMFITNAHAN DALAM MEDIA SOSIAL FACEBOOK GRUP VIKTOR LERIK BEBAS BICARA. Optimisme: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 2(2), 27–36.
Hassal, T. (2012). Sociopragmatics is Slower: A Reply to Chang. Language Sciences, 16 (7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. langsci.2011.12.001.
Indrayani, S. ., & Johansari, C. . (2019). CYBERBULLYING USE ON TEENAGE ARTISTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON INCREASING AWARENESS OF BULLYING. LITERA, 19(15), 275–296.
Karl, B. (2011). Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language (Donald Fraser Goodwin (ed.); illustrate). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kusmanto, H., & Widodo, P. (2022). Positive Politeness Strategies during Online Learning : A Cyberpragmatic Study. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(3), 1170–1182.
Locher, M. . (2013). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(14), 119–141.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pragma.2012.12.002.
Mahsun. (2006). Metode Penelitian Bahasa : Tahap Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mahsun. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Matsumoto, D. (2007). Cultural Contexts and Behavior. Personality, 75(6), 126–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00476.x.
Mey, J. L. (2003). Context and (dis) Ambiguity: A Pragmatic View. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8). https://doi.org/https:// d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / S 0 3 7 8 - 2166(02)00139-X.
Olshtain, E., & Treger, I. (2023). Cyberpragmatics: Complaints and the Collective Perspective. Contrastive Pragmatics, 4(3), 385-409.
Orsini-Jones, M., Lee, F., Orsini-Jones, M., & Lee, F. (2018). Cyberpragmatics. Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship: Identifying cyberpragmatic rules of engagement in telecollaboration, 25-37.
Pranowo, P. (2020). Perspektif Masyarakat Jawa Terhadap Pemakaian Bahasa Nonverbal: Studi Kasus Etnopragmatik. LITERA, 19(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/ ltr.v19i1.28873.
Pratama, Y. A. (2022). UJARAN KEBENCIAN PENGGUNA FACEBOOK BULAN JANUARI - FEBUARI 2022 ( KAJIAN PRAGMATIK SIBER). Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, Dan Pembelajaran, 17(27), 1–13.
Rahardi, R. K. (2020a). Building Critical Awareness of Corona Virus-Related News : Cyber-Pragmatic Study of Covid-19 Hoaxes on Social Media. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 5398–5409.
Rahardi, R. K. (2020b). KONTEKS DALAM PERSPEKTIF CYBERPRAGMATICS. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 38(2), 151–163.
Rahardi, R. K. (2023). Social–Societal Context Element Changes in Cyberpragmatics Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2771-2779.
Sudaryanto. (2016). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Yus, F. (2016). Towards a cyberpragmatics of mobile instant messaging. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Society and Education in the Networked Age, 7-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.90040
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 54 | views : 27Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Lailiyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kawistara is published by the Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada.