Bioassay Method Development to Test Sitophilus oryzae Sensitivity against Phosphine

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpti.75904

Nafsiyah Agustina Harahap(1*), Witjaksono Witjaksono(2), Edhi Martono(3), Y. Andi Trisyono(4)

(1) Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada Jln. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
(2) Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada Jln. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
(3) Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada Jln. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
(4) Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada Jln. Flora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55281 Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Sitophilus oryzae is a cereal product pest found in warehouses. The presence of this pest negatively impacts the quality and quantity of stored rice. The common method used to control warehouse pests is fumigation. However, frequent use of insecticides will trigger resistance within target pest populations. This study aimed to develop a bioassay method based on the Food Agriculture Organization (FAO) protocols and modify bioassay protocols to determine S. oryzae susceptibility of populations collected from traditional markets across Yogyakarta. Field populations were collected from eight traditional markets in Yogyakarta (Lempuyangan Market [Kapanewon Danurejan], Kranggan Market [Kapanewon Jetis], Caturtunggal Market [Kapanewon Depok], Godean Market [Kapanewon Godean], Imogiri Market [Kapanewon Imogiri], Pleret Market [Kapanewon Pleret], Kasihan Market [Kapanewon Lendah], and Brosot Market [Kapanewon Galur]). The reference population was obtained from the Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology(SEAMEO BIOTROP). The bioassay was carried out following FAO protocols by using a glass jar fumigation chamber (volume 2 L) which was a modification of the desiccator of FAO recommended method number 16. This test used the lowest testable dose for this method: 0.01 × 10-2 mg/2L or 0.5 × 10-2 µg/L tested on 100 imagoes which were divided into five replications and obtained 100% mortality on the second day (48 hours). Results showed that the FAO fumigation chamber method could not be used in the test, so modifications were carried out to determine tested doses by changing the volume of the fumigation container. The test used three container volumes, including 20, 60, and 80 L. Result from 20 L container showed 82-100% mortality, 60 L containers showed 69-100% mortality, and 80 L containers showed 24-79% mortality. Results from 80 L container was suitable for the bioassay because it was able to test the lowest dose on reference insects. Eight doses ranging from 0.125 to 1.625 × 10-2 µg/L, and an untreated control were used to determine the LD50 of phosphine on each population. Insects were fumigated for 48 hours and then removed to observe mortality. The LD50 of the reference population was 0.27 × 10-2 µg/L while 0.29-0.54 × 10-2 µg/L for field populations. These findings indicate that S. oryzae populations collected from traditional markets in Yogyakarta were still susceptible to phosphine.


Keywords


bioassay method development; phosphine; rice; Sitophilus oryzae; susceptibility

Full Text:

PDF


References

ACIAR. (1998). Petunjuk Fumigasi Biji-bijian Regional ASEAN: Dasar dan Petunjuk Umum. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR.

Agrafioti, P., Athanassiou, C. G., & Nayak, M. K. (2019). Detection of Phosphine Resistance in Major Stored-Product Insects in Greece and Evaluation of a Field Resistance Test Kit. Journal of Stored Products Research, 82, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.02.004

Batta, Y. A. (2004). Control of Rice Weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L., Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with Various Formulations of Metarhizium anisopliae. Crop Protection, 23(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.07.001

Bello, G. D., Padin, S., Lastra, C. L., & Fabrizio, M. (2000). Laboratory Evaluation of Chemical-Biological Control of the Rice Weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) in Stored Grains. Journal of Stored Products Research, 37(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(00)00009-6

Busvine, J. R. (1980). Recommended Methods for Measurement of Pest Resistance to Pesticides. Rome, Italy: FAO.

Hendrival, H., & Muetia, R. (2016). Pengaruh Periode Penyimpanan Beras terhadap Pertumbuhan Populasi Sitophilus oryzae (L.) dan Kerusakan Beras. Biogenesis: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 4(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v4i2.2514

Holloway, J. C., Falk, M. G., Emery, R. N., Collins, P. J., & Nayak, M. K. (2016). Resistance to Phosphine in Sitophilus oryzae in Australia: A National Analysis of Trends and Frequencies Over Time and Geographical Spread. Journal of Stored Products Research, 69, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2016.07.004

Huang, Y., Li, F., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Shen, F., & Tang, P. (2019). Susceptibility of Tribolium castaneum to Phosphine in China and Functions of Cytochrome P450s in Phosphine Resistance. Journal of Pest Science, 92(3), 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-019-01088-7

Isnaini, M., Pane, E. R., & Wiridianti, S. (2015). Pengujian Beberapa Jenis Insektisida Nabati terhadap Kutu Beras (Sitophilus oryzae L). Jurnal Biota, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/biota/article/view/379

Jagadeesan, R., & Nayak, M. K. (2017). Phosphine Resistance Does not Confer Cross-Resistance to Sulfuryl Fluoride in Four Major Stored Grain Insect Pests. Pest Management Science, 73(7), 1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4468

Jagadeesan, R., Singarayan, V. T., Chandra, K., Ebert, P. R., & Nayak, M. K. (2018). Potential of Co-Fumigation with Phosphine (PH3) and Sulfuryl Fluoride (SO2F2) for the Management of Strongly Phosphine-Resistant Insect Pests of Stored Grain. Journal of Economic Entomology, 111(6), 2956–2965. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toy269

Kashi, K. P., & Bond, E. J. (1975). The Toxic Action of Phosphine: Role of Carbon Dioxide on the Toxicity of Phosphine to Sitophilus granarius (L.) and Tribolium confusum DuVal. Journal of Stored Products Research, 11(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(75)90056-9

Kim, B. S., Song, J. E., Park, J. S., Park, Y. J., Shin, E. M., & Yang, J. O. (2019). Insecticidal Effects of Fumigants (EF, MB, and PH3) towards Phosphine-Susceptible and -Resistant Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Insects, 10(10), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10100327

Moses, J. P., Nattudurai, G., Baskar, K., Arokiyaraj, S., & Jayakumar, M. (2020). Efficacy of Essential Oil from Clausena anisata and its Impact on Biochemical Changes of Sitophilus oryzae. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18), 23215–23221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08928-5

Nath, N. S., Bhattacharya, I., Tuck, A. G., Schlipalius, D. I., & Ebert, P. R. (2011). Mechanisms of Phosphine Toxicity. Journal of Toxicology, 2011, 494168 https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/494168

NPIC (2009). Methyl Bromide (Technical Fact Sheet). National Pesticide Information Center. Corvallis. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).

Nguyen, T. T., Collins, P. J., & Ebert, P. R. (2015). Inheritance and Characterization of Strong Resistance to Phosphine in Sitophilus oryzae (L.). PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0124335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124335

Park, I. K., Lee, S. G., Choi, D. H., Park, J. D., & Ahn, Y. J. (2003). Insecticidal Activities of Constituents Identified in the Essential Oil from Leaves of Chamaecyparis obtusa against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Journal of Stored Products Research, 39(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(02)00030-9

Phillips, T. W., & Throne, J. E. (2010). Biorational Approaches to Managing Stored-Product Insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 55, 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090451

Prijono, D., D. O. S., & Widiyanti, S. (Eds.) (2006). Modul Pengelolaan Hama Gudang Terpadu. Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology (SEAMEO BIOTROP), Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).

Rohman, A., & Maharani, A. (2017). Proyeksi Kebutuhan Konsumsi Pangan Beras. Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 32(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v32i1.12144

Susanti, Yunus, M., & Pasaru, F. (2017). Efektifitas Ekstrak Daun Pandan Wangi (Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb) terhadap Kumbang Beras (Sitophylus oryzae L.). Agroland: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pertanian, 24(3), 208–213. Retrieved from http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/AGROLAND/article/view/9489

Thangaraj, S. R., McCulloch, G. A., Subtharishi, S., Chandel, R. K., Debnath, S., Subramaniam, C., Walter, G. H., & Subbarayalu, M. (2019). Genetic Diversity and its Geographic Structure in Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera; Curculionidae) Across India – Implications for Managing Phosphine Resistance. Journal of Stored Products Research, 84, 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2019.101512



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpti.75904

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1198 | views : 631

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Perlindungan Tanaman Indonesia ISSN 1410-1637 (print), ISSN 2548-4788 (online) is published by the Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, in collaboration with Indonesian Entomological Society (Perhimpunan Entomologi Indonesia, PEI) and Indonesian Phytopathological Society (Perhimpunan Fitopatologi Indonesia, PFI). The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.  

View website statistics