Peningkatan Kompetensi Tutor Blok Elektif dalam Pembuatan dan Penilaian Laporan Kasus

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25447

Titiek Djannatun(1*), Riyani Wikaningrum(2), Rita Rita Murnikusumawatie(3), R. W. Susilawati(4)

(1) Bagian Mikrobiologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI, Jakarta
(2) Bagian Mikrobiologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI, Jakarta
(3) Bagian Mata Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI, Jakarta
(4) Bagian Anatomi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI, Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Elective block of the Faculty of Medicine YARSI University offers five topics. The evaluation results found a variation of tutor competence in writing and grading the case reports. The aims of this study is to improve the tutors’ competence in writing and grading Case Report.

Method: Ten Case reports were selected and assessed by the study team. Thirty Tutor participated in the workshop. The tutor competence in the assessment case reports were analysed by pre test and post test compared with expert.  Tutors’ performance was analyzed using the inter-rater reliability and students feedback using questioner.

Results: This study found that 13 tutors gave lower absolute number of grade after the workshop, range from  1 to 14 points, and 3 tutors gave higher grade range from 3 to 6 points, and 5 tutors gave the same grade. The differences between the tutors’ and standard widened  in 9 (42.9%) shortened in 9 (42.9%), and the same in 3 (14.3%). The workshops have a positive impact on achieving similar  perception case report writing and grading.

Conclusion:  The case report grading must be done by tutors who have the same competence and perception of each grading item.  The workshop gave the positive impact to the tutor as a rater. Case report grading with rubric to get a fair and valid must be assessed by more tutors.

 


Keywords


Elective block, case report, rater, tutor

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. Standar Pendidikan Profesi Dokter. Ist Ed. Perpustakaan Nasional. Jakarta; 2006, pp. 1-9.
  2. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI. 2006.
  3. Crawford VLS. The Student Selected Component (SSC) Programme. Queen’s University Belfast. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences; 2009.
  4. Dong Z, B. Gastel, El. Whalen, Tu Yun-e. Biomedical Writing Course . Peking Union Medical College and Beijing Medical University Press; 1998, pp 176-95.
  5. Cohen, H. How to write a patient case report. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2006 [cited Oct]; 63: 1888-92.
  6. Citing Medicine: the NLM style guide for authors, editors, and publishers, 2nd Ed. [cited 2010 August]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/citingmedicine
  7. Alguire, P. Case Report. Michigan State University Primary Care Fellowship Program. http://www.acponline.org/residents_fellows/competitions/abstract/prepare/ accessed: 2 Juli 2012. 2012.
  8. P2K-FKUY. Panduan tutor Blok Elektif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI Tahun Akademik 2011- 2012. 20121.
  9. P2K-FKUY. Panduan Mahasiswa Blok Elektif Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI Tahun Akademik 2011- 2012. 20122.
  10. Widhiarso W. Melibatkan Rater dalam Pengembangan Alat Ukur. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta. 2010.
  11. Ebel, R.L. dan Frisbie, D.A. Essentials of Educational Measurement. New Jersey. Prentice Hall; 1991.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25447

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 5515 | views : 2273

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Titiek Djannatun, Riyani Wikaningrum, Rita Rita Murnikusumawatie, R. W. Susilawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  

 JPKI Stats