Peran Umpan Balim Bagi Mahasiswa Kedokteran

Herlina I.S Wungouw; Diana V. Doda

doi:10.22146/jpki.25099

Peran Umpan Balim Bagi Mahasiswa Kedokteran

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25099

Herlina I.S Wungouw^(1*), Diana V. Doda⁽²⁾

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado, Sulawesi Utara
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado, Sulawesi Utara
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: Feedback is an important part in teaching and learning process that serve as a catalyst to enhance learners’ achievement. In medical education, the importance of feedback has been recognized for learners at all level; undergraduate and postgraduate, in preclinical and clinical phases for more that twenty years. This literature review wants to explore what is the effective feedback for medical students and what are the factors that affect giving feedback?

Method: Relevant literatures are selected as basis of recommendations on giving feedback in medical education.

Results: The eighteen articles that fulfill the inclusion criteria have been collected from several resources include Medline, Pubmed and ERIC databases. Characteristics of effective feedback have been identified from those articles include positive, specific, private, well-timing, non-judgmental, interaction with sender, immediately given, from expert content, simple, and task oriented. While the factors affect giving feedback fall into four topics: the content of feedback, the method of delivery, sender credibility and training.

Conclusion: Feedback in medical education has an essential role to enhance students’ learning behavior. Four factors that were affecting feedback delivery are content of the feedback, feedback delivery method, feedback provider’s credibility, and also training in feedback delivery.

Keywords

Effective feedback, characteristic, factors

Full Text:

PDF

References

Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, Mayforth R, Quin J, Williams RG, et al. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: a randomized controlled trial. Medical Education. 2006;40:746-9.
Paukert JL, RichardsML, Olney C. An encounter card system for increasing feedback to students. The American Journal of Surgery. 2002;183:300-4.
Ende J. Feedback in clinicalmedical education. JAMA. 1983;250:777-81.
Sachdeva AK. Use of efective feedback to facilitate adult learning. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11:106-8.
Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM. Developing the instinct: feedback. Medical Teacher. 2002;24(3):245-8.
Perera J, Lee N, Win K, Perera J, Wijesuriya L. Formative feedback to students: the mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations. Medical Teacher. 2008;30:395–9.
Lincoln M, Carmody D, Maloney D. Professional development of students and clinical educators. In: McAllister L, Lincoln M, McLeod S, Maloney D, editors. Facilitating Learning in Clinical Settings. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes, 1997:87-92.
Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:111-6.
Elnicki DM, Layne RD, Ogden PE, Morris DK. Oral versus written feedback inmedical clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:155-8.
Poulos A, Mahony MJ. Effectiveness of feedback: the students’ perspective. assessment and evaluation in higher education. 2008; 33(2):143-54.
Prystowsky JB, Da Rosa DA. A learning prescription permits feedback on feedback. The American Journal of Surgery. 2003;185:264-7.
Colletti LM. Difficulty with negative feedback: face to face evaluation of Junior medical student clinical kinerjance results in grade inflation. Journal of Surgical Research. 2000;90:82-7.
Sydney University. Medical education course MDED 5002 scholarship of teaching in medicine-guideline for literature review. Sidney: Sydney University; 2008.
Bing-You RG, Paterson J, LevineMA. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher. 1997;19(1):40-4.
Parikh A, McReelis KM, Hodges B. Student feedback in problem based learning: a survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical school. Medical Education. 2001;35:632-6.
Daelmans HEM, Overmeer RM, Hem-Stokroos HHVD, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CD, Vleuten CPMVD. In training assessment: qualitative study of efects on super vision and feedback in an undergraduate clinical rotation. Medical Education. 2006;40:51-8.
Niehaus AH, York NL, DaRosa DA, Markwell SJ, Folse R. The effect of feedback on students’ abilities to write daily progress notes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 1995;7(2):92-4.
Brown S, Knight P. Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page; 1994.
Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, Dubrowski A. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. The American Journal of Surgery. 2007;193:105-10.
Van Sickle KR, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. The effect of escalating feedback on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:220-4.
Paul S, Dawson KP, Lanphear JH, Cheema MY. Video recording feedback: a feasible and effective approach to teaching history-taking and physical examination skills in undergraduate paediatric medicine. Medical Education. 1998;32:332-6.
Matzie KA, Kerfoot P, Hafler JP, Breen WM. Spaced education improves the feedback that surgical residents give tomedical students: a randomised trial. The American Journal of Surgery. 2009;197(2):252-7.
Nilsen S, Baerheim A. Feedback on video recorded consultations inmedical teaching: why students loathe and love it – a focus-group based qualitative study. Medical Education. 2005;5:1-6.
Fernando N, Cleland J, McKenzie H, Cassar K. Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-CEX assessments. Medical Education. 2008;42:89-95.
Steinert Y, Lawn N, Handfield-Jones R, Nasmith L, Lussier D, Levitht C. Orientation for new teachers: workshop on clinical teaching skills.Canadian Family Physician. 1995;41:79-85.