MODEL PERLINDUNGAN DAN PEMENUHAN HAK PASIEN TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN INFORMED CONSENT DI INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.37504

Arif Rohman(1*), Syafruddin Syafruddin(2)

(1) Universitas Borneo Tarakan
(2) Universitas Borneo Tarakan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Law and health is a different science. But due to the rampant cases that occur related to the practice of medicine, the law contribute in providing solutions for both physicians and patients as consumers of health, although medicine has a code of professional ethics as well as Standard Operations as the basis of doctors in carrying out their work. The legal tools are still needed because in practice, there are many medical malpractices. This study focuses on 2 (two) important things, first, how judges assess the express consent on the implementation of informed consent and secondly, how the model of protection and fulfillment of patient rights in the implementation of informed consent in Indonesi.

The research method used is normative legal research, because it is based on health law and the health minister's regulation as the main benchmark in analyzing,  then integrates with court decisions relating to medical practices that have occurred in Indonesi.

The results of the discussion illustrate that, the main point of doctors and health workers in carrying out their duties is the implementation of concrete agreements both written and oral. Empirical facts show that, doctors do not carry out the procedure because the patient is unconscious when will be a medical action. Judex Facti's consideration is entirely based on information and documents made unilaterally by doctors without medical records, this is in violation of the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (3) and (4) Regulation of the Minister of Health Rl Number 585 / Men.Kes / Per / IX / 1989 concerning medical approval. Second, the model for protecting patient rights in law enforcement is applying reverse evidence to doctors as defendants of malpractice in relation to the fulfillment of informed consent, because the medical profession is able to explain. From several cases, it appears that the judge's decision is not fundamental to informed concent, but tends to the negligence aspect of the doctor or medical personnel by referring to Article 359 of the Criminal Code, is negligence also called error, lack of caution.


Keywords


Model; Protection; Patient Rights; Informed consent

Full Text:

PDF


References

Nyoman Serikat Putrajaya, 2004. Pemberlakuan Hukum Pidana Secara Retroaktif Sebagai Penyimbang Asas Legalitas dan Asas Keadilan (Suatu Pergeseran Paradigma Dalam Ilmu Hukum Pidana, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru besar, Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 7 Agustus. R. Subekti, 2001. Hukum Pembuktian, Cetakan 13, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita. Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006, Sisi-Sisi lain dari Hukum di Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua, Penerbit Buku Kompas, Jakarta Satjipto Rahardjo, 2009, Penegakan Hukum, Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta. Sudibyo Saleh, 2004. Komitmen Supremasi Hukum di tengah Kemajuan Masyarakat Indonesia, Makalah yang disampaikan dalam Dialog Nasional Profesional Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan di tengah Ma-syarakat yang Bersih dan Berwibawa, Jakarta, 11 Oktober. Teguh Samudra, 1992. Hukum Pembuktian dalam Acara Perdata, cetakan I, Bandung, Penerbit Alumni. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktik Kedokteran, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 116, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4431. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 144. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rumah Sakit, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5072. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5072. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Kesehatan Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4148. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 722/Menkes/SK/XII/2002 Tentang Pedoman Peraturan Internal Rumah Sakit. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 377/Menkes/SK/III/2007 Tentang Standar Profesi Perekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 290/Men.Kes/PER/III/2008 Tentang Persetujuan Tindakan Medik



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.37504

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 345 | views : 741

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREGoogle ScholarWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)