KEADILAN DALAM SATU (INTRA) GENERASI:SEBUAH PENGANTAR BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI KEADILAN LINGKUNGAN

Andri Gunawan Wibisana

doi:10.22146/jmh.19143

KEADILAN DALAM SATU (INTRA) GENERASI:SEBUAH PENGANTAR BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI KEADILAN LINGKUNGAN

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.19143

Andri Gunawan Wibisana^(1*)

(1) Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Abstract
This paper attempts to discuss intragenerational equity based on the taxonomy of environmental justice, i.e. distributive justice, corrective justice, procedural justice, and social justice. Based on distributive justice perspective, the paper places the polluter pays principle (PPP) and common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR) as two important legal principles in implementing intragenerational equity. Based on corrective justice perpective, the paper considers that the PPP plays an important role in implementing intragenerational equity. The paper explains the implementation of procedural justice in terms of access to participation, access to information, and legal standing. Finally, the paper observes the importance of the integration of environmental protection and social justice.

Intisari
Tulisan ini mencoba untuk mendiskusikan lebih mendalam keadilan intra generasi dengan menggunakan
taksonomi keadilan lingkungan, yaitu keadilan distributif, keadilan korektif, keadilan prosedural, dan keadilan sosial. Secara khusus, berdasarkan perspektif keadilan distributif, tulisan ini melihat adanya kaitan erat antara keadilan intra generasi dengan polluter pays principle (PPP) dan common-but-differentiated responsibility. Dalam perspektif keadilan korektif, tulisan ini melihat pentingnya PPP untuk mewujudkan keadilan intra generasi. Tulisan ini melihat perwujudan keadilan prosedural melalui hak untuk berpartisipasi dalam pengambilan keputusan, hak atas informasi, dan hak gugat. Dalam konteks keadilan sosial, tulisan menjelaskan integrasi perlindungan lingkungan dengan penciptaan keadilan sosial.

Keywords

keadilan lingkungan, pembangunan berkelanjutan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adler, John dan David Wilkinson. Environmental Law and Ethics. London: Mac Millan Press, 1999. Arnstein, Sherry R. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1969. Hal. 216-224. Beder, Sharon. Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdiciplinary Introduction. New York: Earthscan, 2006. Boyle, Alan. “Economic Growth and Protection of the Environment: Impact of International Law and Policy”. Dalam: Alan Boyle, (ed.), Environmental Regulation and Economic Growth. London: Clarendon Press, 1994. Hal. 173-188. Boyle, A. dan Patricia Birnie. International Law and the Environment, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Callahan, Kathe. Elements of Effective Governance: Measurement, Accountability, and Participation. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2007. Creighton, James L. The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement. San Francisco, CA :Jossey-Bass, 2005. Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press, 1978. Faure, Michael. “Environmental Law and Economics”, METRO—Maastricht University, 2001. Faure, Michael dan Goran Skogh. The Economic Analysis of Environmental Policy and Law: An Introduction. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003. Fisher, E.C. “The Precautionary Principle as a Legal Standard for Public Decision-Making: the Role of Judicial and Merits Review in Ensuring Reasoned Deliberation”. Dalam: R. Harding dan E. Fisher. Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle. Sydney: The Federation Press, 1999. Hal. 83-98. Fisher, Elizabeth dan Ronny Harding. “The Precautionary Principle: Towards a Deliberative, Transdisciplinary Problem-Solving Process”. Dalam: R. Harding dan E. Fisher, Perspective on the Precautionary Principle. Sydney: The Federation Press, 1999. Hal. 290-298. French, Duncan. “Developing States and International Environmental Law: The Importance of Differentiated Responsibilities”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 49, No.1, 2000. Hal. 35-60. Habermas, Jürgen. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2007. Hunter, D., J. Salzman, dan D. Zaelke. International Environmental Law and Policy. New York: Foundation Press, 1998. Kuehn, Robert R. “A Taxonomy of Environmental Justice”, Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 30, 2000. Hal. 10681-10703. Langhelle, Oluf. “Sustainable Development and Social Justice: Expanding the Rawlsian Framework of Global Justice”, Environmental Values, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2000. Hal. 295-323. Magraw, Daniel B. dan Lisa D. Hawke. “Sustainable Development”, Dalam: Daniel Bodansky, Jutta Brunnée, dan Ellen Hey (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Hal. 613-638. Mansfield, Edwin. Principles of Microeconomics, 4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1983. Pearce, D.W. dan R.K. Turner. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990. Pindyck, R.S. dan D.L. Rubinfield. Microeconomics, 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall, 2001. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge, Ma: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999. Sands, Philippe. Principles of International Environmental Law: Vol. 1, Frameworks, Standards, and Implementation. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995. Siegrist, Michael. “The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2000. Hal. 195–204. Siegrist, Michael dan George Cvetkovich, “Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2000. Hal. 713-9. Solberg, Eric J. Intermediate Microeconomics. Plano, Tex: Business Publication, 1982. Solum, Lawrence B. “Procedural Justice”, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 78, 2004. Hal. 181-321 Stirling, Andy. “Opening up or Closing down? Analysis, Participation and Power in the Social Appraisal of Technology”. Dalam: M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne (eds.), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books, 2005. Hal. 218-231. Syfers, James. “Human Rights versus Classical Liberalism: A Study in the Theory of Value”. Dalam: Anatole Anton, Milton Fisk, dan Nancy Holmstrom, Not for Sale: In Defense of Public Goods. Boulder: Westview Press, 2000. Hal. 145-170. Vos, E. “Overcoming the Crisis of Confidence: Risk Regulation in an Enlarged European Union”, inauguration speech, University of Maastrich, 2004. Weiss, Edith Brown. “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in Perspective”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), Vol. 96, 2002. Hal. 366-368.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.19143