Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16243

Tata Wijayanta(1*), Sandra Dini Febri Aristya(2), Kunthoro Basuki(3), Ms. Herliana(4), Hasrul Halili(5), RB. Sutanto(6), Retno Supartinah(7)

(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(4) 
(5) 
(6) 
(7) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The conception of “formal truth” in civil procedure is about to become a debate among academicians and practitioners because it is deemed no longer relevant to achieve justice. Modern paradigm begins to consider that this concept should be given similar interpretation with material truth theory adhered by criminal procedure.

 

Konsep kebenaran formal dalam acara perdata mulai menjadi perdebatan di antara para akademisi dan praktisi karena dianggap sudah tidak lagi relevan dan jauh dari rasa keadilan. Paradigma saat ini mesti mulai mempertimbangkan bahwa konsep kebenaran formal harus diberi pengertian yang sama dengan konsep kebenaran material dalam acara pidana.


Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16243

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1835 | views : 23668

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Tata Wijayanta, Sandra Dini Febri Aristya, Kunthoro Basuki, Ms. Herliana, Hasrul Halili, RB. Sutanto, Retno Supartinah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)