Pemaknaan Hakim tentang Korupsi dan Implikasinya Pada Putusan: Kajian Perspektif Hermeneutika Hukum

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16241

Muhammad Syamsudin(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Answering the increasing rate of acquittal verdicts handed on corruption charges, this study analyses judges’ interpretation of corruption and its implication to their judgements. We find that judges perceive corruption in either narrow or broad interpretations. Narrow approach tends to result in acquittal while broad interpretation ends in guilty verdicts.

 

Dilatarbelakangi oleh fenomena jamaknya putusan bebas terhadap tersangka korupsi di pengadilan umum, studi ini mempelajari pemaknaan hakim akan korupsi dan implikasinya terhadap putusan. Hasil studi menemukan bahwa terdapat dua pemaknaan hakim tentang korupsi: pemaknaan sempit dan luas. Pemaknaan sempit cenderung menghasilkan putusan bebas, sedangkan pemaknaan luas cenderung melahirkan putusan bersalah.


Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16241

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3719 | views : 4147

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Muhammad Syamsudin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)