KAJIAN KASUS BLBI: PENGGESERAN HUKUM PUBLIK KE DALAM LAPANGAN HUKUM PRIVAT

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16179

Aang Achmad(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


We identify tendency where corruption cases are resolved under civil law provisions rather than criminal law. Apparently, UNCAC 2003, as ratified by Act 7/2006, is the basis for examining BLBI scandal under Inpres 8/2002 concerning ‘release and discharge’ policy. Examination of corruption crimes seems to embark on to private law aspects.

 

Korupsi diberikan sarana penyelesaian sengketa melalui aspek hukum perdata (litigasi/non-litigasi). Hal ini sejalan dengan UNCAC 2003, yang diratifikasi dengan UU No. 7 Tahun 2006 yang menjadi landasan penyelesaian kasus BLBI melalui Inpres No. 8 Tahun 2002 tentang release and discharge. Terjadi pergeseran hukum pidana menjadi hukum perdata dalam menyelesaikan perkara korupsi.


Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16179

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 505 | views : 830

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Aang Achmad

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREGoogle ScholarWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)