Pembuktian Perdata dalam Kasus Malpraktik di Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16166

Sandra Dini Febri Aristya(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The research on civil law evidence on malpractice cases in Yogyakarta was conducted through field and literature studies. The conclusion is that civil law evidence in malpractice case which happened in Yogyakarta is subjected to the civil law procedure. However, the special character of the case creates some deviation on the procedures.

 

Penelitian tentang pembuktian perdata dalam kasus malpraktik di Yogyakarta dilakukan melalui studi lapangan dan studi pustaka. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembuktian perdata dalam kasus malpraktik di Yogyakarta masih menggunakan prosedur hukum acara perdata yang berlaku positif. Namun, karakter khusus dari kasus ini menyebabkan beberapa penyimpangan prosedur.


Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16166

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2409 | views : 24842

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Sandra Dini Febri Aristya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)