FINALITY OF INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION IN REGARD TO JUDICIAL REVIEW

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15862

Suwarno Abadi(1*)

(1) Constitutional Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Wijaya Putra, Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article examines the constitutional status of Constitutional Court’s decisions constitutionally guaranteed as final. This status very critical because it could lead Constitutional Court to the judicial supremacy position. This article argues against this possibility. The status of Constitutional Court’s decisions should be critized on the basis that its finality is prima facie, not absolute. As a solution, this article takes a position called departmentalism which means that court and legislature are not supreme in their authority to interpret the constitution. Artikel ini membahas tentang status konstitusional putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang dijamin konstitusi bersifat final. Status tersebut sangat kritikal karena dapat mengarahkan Mahkamah Konstitusi ke posisi supremasi yudisial. Artikel ini berargumen tidak setuju atas kemungkinan tersebut. Oleh karena itu, status putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi perlu dikritisi dengan dasar bahwa finalitasnya tersebut bersifat “prima facie”, tidak absolut. Sebagai solusinya, artikel ini mengambil posisi departementalisme yang memiliki pengertian bahwa pengadilan dan legislator tidak memiliki supremasi atas kewenangan untuk melakukan interpretasi konstitusi.

Keywords


Constitutional Court’s decisions; finality; departmentalism; putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi; finalitas; departementalisme

Full Text:

Untitled


References

A. Books

Altman, Andrew, 2001, Arguing about Law, Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont- California.

Ginsburg, Tom, 2003, Judicial Review in New Democracies:    Constitutional    Courts    in Asian Cases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, 2010, Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Hamilton, Alexander, et al., 2003, The Federalist with Letters of Brutus (Terence Ball ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kurnia, Titon Slamet, 2013, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik  Indonesia:  Sang  Penjaga  HAM (The Guardian of Human Rights), Alumni, Bandung.

McIlwain,CharlesHoward,1947,Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, Cornell University Press, New York-Ithaca.

Witthington, Keith E., 2007, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The President, the Supreme Court and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

Bickel, Alexander M., 1986, The Least Dangerous

B.      Article and Research Journal

Butt,    Simon,    “Conditional    Constitutionality, Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Second Edition, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Pragmatism and the Rule of Law”, Legal Studies Research Paper – Sydney Law School, No. 09/28, 2009.

Calabresi, Steven G., “The Tradition of the Written Constitution: Text, Precedent and Burke”, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 57, 2006.

Eskridge, Jr., William N., “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 101, 1991.

Friedman,    Barry,     “The     History     of     the Countermajoritarian   Difficulty,  Part   One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy”, New York University Law Review, Vol. 73, 1998.

Rubin, Edward, “Judicial Review and the Right to Resist”, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 97, 2008.

Soeroso, Fajar Laksono, “Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal  Konstitusi,  Vol.  11,  No.  1,  March 2014.

Widiss, Deborah A., “Shadow Precedents and the Separation of Powers: Statutory Interpretation of Congressional Overrides,” Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 84, 2009.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15862

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 494 | views : 817

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREGoogle ScholarWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)