Pregnancy-related Complications in Relation with Delivery Complication in Urban Public Health Center in 2019-2020: an Analytic Comparative Study
Abiyyu Didar Haq(1), Cut Warnaini(2*), Muhammad Rizkinov Jumsa(3), Deasy Irawati(4)
(1) Mataram University
(2) Mataram University
(3) Mataram University
(4) Mataram University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction: With a huge gap of knowledge and understanding created by the current pandemic, especially regarding maternal health, this research aimed to compare and analyze the correlation between pregnancy-related complications and delivery complications in an urban public health center before and during the pandemic. Methods:This is an analytic comparative study utilizing a retrospective cohort approach. Medical records of pregnant women during 2019-2020 were obtained from Pagesangan public health center with approved ethics from Mataram University and related government agencies. Collected data were then analyzed for each year and then compared between 2019 and 2020 to see if there were any significant differences between maternal health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Medical records of 653 pregnant women were collected in this study. Twenty-two of 311 and 27 of 342 pregnancyrelated complications were recorded in 2019 and 2020, respectively. In contrast, 68 of 311 and 70 of 342 delivery complications were recorded in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Analysis was done to obtain each year’s relative risk (RR), and then we compared the obtained RR of both years. In 2019, the RR of pregnancy-related complications to delivery complications was 0,398 (95% CI 0,104-1,518); in 2020, the obtained RR was 0,522 (95% CI 0,176-1,550). Conclusion: Pregnancy-related complications were not the risk factor for delivery complications in both years. However, a significant correlation was found between maternal age and pregnancy-related complications in 2020, while in 2019, gravidity was also significantly related to delivery complications.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). People at Increased Risk and other people who need to take extra precautions. [Online].; 2020 [cited 2020 November 25. Available from: HYPERLINK “https://www. cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extraprecautions/index.html” https://www.cdc. gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extraprecautions/index.html
2. Iyengar K, Mabrouk A, Jain VK, Venkatesan A, Vaishya R. Learning opportunities from COVID-19 and future effects on health care system. Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome. 2020 Juni 20; 14(5): 943-946. DOI: 10.1016/j. dsx.2020.06.036
3. Wu H, Sun W, Huang X, Yu S, Wang H, Bi X, et al. Online Antenatal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020 Juli; 22(7). DOI: HYPERLINK “https://doi.org/10.2196%2F19916” t “_blank” 10.2196/19916
4. Coxon K, Turienzo CF, Kweekel L, Goodarzi B, Brigante L, Simon A, et al. The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on maternity care in Europe. Midwifery. 2020 Juni 10; 88. DOI: HYPERLINK “https://doi. org/10.1016%2Fj.midw.2020.102779” t “_ blank” 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102779
5. CDC. Covid-19 Incidence, by Urban-Rural Classification in United States, January 22 - October 31, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). 2020 November 19; 69(46): 1753. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a6
6. Kuhnt J, Vollmer S. Antenatal care services and its implications for vital and health outcomes of children: evidence from 193 surveys in 69 lowincome and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2017 November 15; 7(11). DOI: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2017-017122.
7. Titaley CR, Dibley J. Antenatal iron/folic acid supplements, but not postnatal care, prevents neonatal deaths in Indonesia: analysis of Indonesia Demographic and Health Surveys 2002/2003–2007 (a retrospective cohort study). BMJ Open. 2012 Oktober 31; 2(6). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001399
8. Pena-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Garcia-Casal MN, Dowswell T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review. 2015 Juli 22. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5
9. Soma-Pillay P, Catherine NP. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa. 2016 April; 27(2): 89- 94. DOI: HYPERLINK “https://doi. org/10.5830%2FCVJA-2016-021” t “_blank” 10.5830/CVJA-2016-021
10. Intapad S, Alexander BT. Pregnancy Complications and Later Development of Hypertension. Current CArdiovascular Risk Rep. 2013 Juni 1; 7(3): 183-189. DOI: HYPERLINK “https://doi.org/10.1007%2 Fs12170-013-0303-3” t “_blank” 10.1007/ s12170-013-0303-3
11. Bauserman M, Lokangaka A, Thorsten V, Tshefu A, Goudar SS, Esamai F. Risk factors for maternal death and trends in maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a prospective longitudinal cohort analysis. Reproductive Health. 2015 Juni 8; 12(2). DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S5
12. Tesfaye G, Loxton D, Chojenta C, Semahegn A, Smith R. Delayed initiation of antenatal care and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Health. 2017 November 15; 14: 150. DOI: 10.1186/ s12978-017-0412-4.
13. Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional BKKBN. BKKBN : Usia Pernikahan Ideal 21-25 Tahun. [Online].; 2017 [cited 2021 September 29. Available from: HYPERLINK “https://www.bkkbn.go.id/detailpost/bkkbnusia-pernikahan-ideal-21-25-tahun” https:// www.bkkbn.go.id/detailpost/bkkbn-usiapernikahan-ideal-21-25-tahun.
14. Hailemariam, Agegnehu W, Derese M. Exploring COVID-19 Related Factors Influencing Antenatal Care Services Uptake: A Qualitative Study among Women in a Rural Community in Southwest Ethiopia. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 2021; 12. DOI: 10.1177/2150132721996892.
15. Javaid S, Barringer S, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M, Moyer CA. The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women. Midwifery. 2021; 98(102991). DOI: 10.1016/j. midw.2021.102991
16. Zhang, Ding Z, Liu H, Chen Z, Wu J, Zhang Y, et al. Association between mental stress and gestational hypertension/preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. Obstetric and Gynecology Survey. 2013; 68(12): 825-834. DOI: 10.1097/ OGX.0000000000000001.
17. Harville, Xiong X, Buekens P. Disasters and perinatal health:a systematic review. Obstetric and Gynecology Survey. 2010; 65(11): 713-728. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31820eddbe
18. Ortiz C, Rondeau NU, Moore E, Mulia D. Parental Age and the Risk of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Southern Medical Journal. 2018; 111(9): 544-548. DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000854.
19. Lin L, Wei Y, Zhu W, Wang C, Su R, Feng H, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and associated adverse pregnancy outcomes of anaemia in Chinese pregnant women: a multicentre retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.77441
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 801 | views : 477Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Community Empowerment for Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.