The Difference of Mathematics Learning Achievement between Ipad For Learning Multimedia Learning and Conventional Learning Media in Junior High School Students
This research includes gender as moderator as well as the intelligence and motivation of learning as the covariance of learning achievement. This research design is causal-comparative by comparing mathematics learning achievement between learning with iPad and conventional media. The overall research’s subjects are 128 students. The result shows that there are differences in learning achievement between multimedia learning iPad for Learning and conventional learning media (F=48,698, p<0,05). Students who use iPad media have an average mathematics learning achievement higher than a student in conventional learning media. In this research, the interaction between genders and learning media on mathematics learning achievement proved to be low (F=0,318, p>0,05).
Agosto, D. E. (2004). Girls and gaming: a summary of the research with implications for practice. Teacher Librarian, 31(3), 8–14. doi: 10.1162/pres.15.3.309
Anderman, E. M., & Mueller, C. (2010). Middle school transitions and adolescent development; Disentangling psychological, social, and biological effects. Dalam J. Meece & Eccles (Ed.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development. New York: Psychology Press
Buckley, S. (2016). Gender and sex differences in student participation, achievement, and engagement in mathematics. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research
Calvin, C. M., Deary, I. J., Fenton, C., Roberts, B. A., Der G., Leckenby, N. (2012). Intelligence in youth and all-cause-mortality: Systematic review with meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 626–644. doi: 10.1093/dyq190
Campbell, J. I. D. (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York And Hove : Psychology Press
Chen, G. D., Nurkhamid, Wang, C. Y., Yang, S. H., Lue, W. Y., & Chang, C. K. (2013). Digital learning playground: Supporting authentic learning experiences in the classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(2), 172–183. doi: 10.1080/10494820.705856
Ciu, F. S. (2013, Januari 8). Nilai Matematika siswa RI 10 besar terendah di dunia. Berita Online Okezone. Retrieved from http://www.okezone.com
Clark, W., & Lucin, R. (2013). What the research says: iPad in the classroom. Journal of Leading Education and Social Research. University of London. Retrieved from https://digitalteachingandlearning.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/ipads-in-the-classroom-report-lkl.pdf
Coughlan, S. (2015, Mei 13). Asia peringkat tertinggi sekolah global, Indonesia nomor 69. Retrieved from http://www.bbbc.com
Dunlosky,J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. CA: Sage Elias, H., Mustafa, S. M. S., Roslan, S., & Noah, R. S. M. (2011). Motivational predictors of academic performance in end year examination. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 29, 1179-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro. 2010.03.116
Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu. F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 337–353. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2594
Gee, J. P. (2007). In what video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Gras, R. M., Burdoy, M., Juste, G., & Corbalan, J. C. (2010). Creativity, intellectual abilities and response styles: Implications for academic performance in the secondary school. Anales de Psicologia, 26(2), 212-219.
Guo, J., Marsh H. W., Parker, P. D, Morin, A. J. S, Yeung, A. S. (2015). Expectancy-value in mathematics, gender and socioeconomic background as predictors of achievement and aspirations: A multi-cohort study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif. 2015.01.008
Guven, G., & Sulun, Y. (2012). The effects of computer-enhanced teaching on academic achievement in 8th grade science and technology course and students attitude towards the course. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(1), 68-79. doi: 10.5539/ ies.v10n9p152
Heinrich, P. (2012). The iPad as a tool for education. NAACE and 9ine consulting, 27(2), 834-844. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.11.008
Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). ‘iPad in Education – A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school’. HICSS ’12 Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 78-87. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.390
López, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education Journal, 54 (4), 901-915. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu. 2009.09.019
Martinez, A. R. (2017). The effects of using GeoGebra on student achievement in secondary mathematics. Thesis of Califormia State University, Monterey Bay. Retrieved from https: //digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/137/
Ozerbas, M. A., & Erdogan, B. H. (2016). The effect of the digital classroom on academic success and online technologies self-efficacy. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 203–212. doi: 10.1007/s11528-015-0860-z
Rao, M. S. (2003). Achievement motivation and achievement in Mathematics. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House
Santrock, J.W. (2014). Educational psychology, 5th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Schoon, I., & Polek, E. (2011). Teenage career aspirations and adult career attainment: The role of gender, social background and general cognitive ability. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 210–217. doi: 10.1177/ 0165025411398183
Suryabrata, S. (2012). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Offset.
Swan, K., Hooft, M., V., Kratcoski, A. & Schenker, J. (2007). Ubiquitous computing and changing possibilities: Representations, conceptualizations and uses of knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4) 481-515. doi: 10.2190/B577-7162-2X11-17N5
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology (GamaJPP)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.