Pengaruh Anchoring dalam Penilaian Kinerja: Sebuah Studi Eksperimen Kuasi dengan Variabel Tergantung Penilaian Task Performance
This study aimed to examine the effects of anchoring in task performance appraisal. It was hypothesized that there would be difference score measuring task performance with high anchoring and low anchoring methods. High anchoring method was predicted to show higher scores rather than using low anchoring method. Participants were 117 post-graduate students from Master of Management in Universitas Gadjah Mada. They were assigned in two groups. The first group (N=70) was instructed to rate an employee from lower to higher score (high anchoring method), while the second group (N=47) was instructed to rate the employee from higher to lower score (low anchoring method). Result of independent sample T-test showed that anchoring method had no significant effect on task performance appraisal. Factors which might be affecting this result are discussed
Bernardin, John H & Russell, Joyce A. (1998). Human resource management: An experiental approach. Boston: Mc Graw-Hill.
Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2003). Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 330-341. doi: 10.1017/S002184 9903030320
Cardy, R. L., & Dobbins, G. H. (1994). Performance appraisal: Alter-native perspectives. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Company
deLeon, L., & Ewen, J.A. (1997). Multi-source performance appraisals: Employee perceptions of fairness. Re ie of Public Personnel Administration, 17, 22-36. doi: 10.1177/0734371X9701700103
DeNisi, A. S. & William, K. J. (1998). Cognitive approach to performance appraisal in G Ferris and K. Rowland. Research in Personel and Human Resources Management, 6, 109-155
Dessler, G. (2003). Human resource management. Thirteenth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188-200. doi: 10.1177/0146167205282152
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van, Boven, L., Gilovich, T., (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327-339. doi: 10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1687
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130. doi: 10.2307/256422
Galinsky, A, D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 657-669
Harris, P, L. (1994). The child's understanding of emotion: Developmental change and the family environment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(1), 3-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01131.x
Kondrasuk, J. (2011). So what would an ideal performance appraisal look like?. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 12(1), 57-71
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational behavioral-Ed. 5. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 46-55.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2013). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.Murphy, K, R. (1989). Dimensions of job performance. In: Dillon RF, Pellegrino JW, eds. Testing: Theoretical and applied perspectives. New York: Praeger
Riggio, R. E., Riggio, H. R., Salinas, C., & Cole, E. J. (2003). The role of social and emotional communication skills in leader emergence and effectiveness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(2), 83-103.
Simonson, I., & Drolet, A. (2004). Anchoring effects on consumers’ willingness‐to‐pay and willingness‐to‐accept. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 681-690. doi: 10.1086/425103
Tsui, A., S. & Ohlott, P. (1988). Multiple assessments of managerial effectiveness: Interrater agreement and consensus in effectiveness models. Pers. Psychol, 41, 779-803. doi: 10.1111/j-1744-570.1988.tb00654.x
Tversky, A., & D. Kahneman. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131 Werther, W. B., & Davis, K. (1993). Human resources and personnel management: (4thed), Singapore: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology (GamaJPP)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.