Perbandingan Properti Psikometris Skala Kesehatan Mental (SKM) antara Metode Administrasi Paper-and-Pencil dan Web-Based

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajpp.32317

Mikael Reno Prasasto(1*), Wahyu Widhiarso(2)

(1) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Advancements on information technology had helped scientific development.
For example, now we could present a test using computers rather than using printed
papers. This research compares the differences between the psychometric properties of a
paper-and-pencil test (PPT) and web-based test (WBT). This research used Skala Kesehatan
Mental (SKM) which was given to 544 junior and senior high-school grade school. The
scale has 32 items and administered with either paper or on a website. The result showed
that each method has a different but not significant psychometric properties. Compared to
PPT, WBT was able to deliver fewer cases of outliers and higher item-total correlation.
Reliability coefficient on both method were satisfying and able to stay unidimensional on
factor analysis. Item endorsability does not appear to have significant differences. More
research on this topic is needed to further examine the effect between each method on test
results.

Keywords


computer testing; web-based test; skala kesehatan mental

Full Text:

PDF


References

Advancements on information technology had helped scientific development. For example, now we could present a test using computers rather than using printed papers. This research compares the differences between the psychometric properties of a paper-and-pencil test (PPT) and web-based test (WBT). This research used Skala Kesehatan Mental (SKM) which was given to 544 junior and senior high-school grade school. The scale has 32 items and administered with either paper or on a website. The result showed that each method has a different but not significant psychometric properties. Compared to PPT, WBT was able to deliver fewer cases of outliers and higher item-total correlation. Reliability coefficient on both method were satisfying and able to stay unidimensional on factor analysis. Item endorsability does not appear to have significant differences. More research on this topic is needed to further examine the effect between each method on test results.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajpp.32317

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 142 | views : 97

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology  (GamaJPP) Terindeks di :
   

Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta. 55781
email:gamajpp.psikologi@ugm.ac.id | http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamajpp