- Open Submissions
- Peer Reviewed
Peer Review Process
Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology (GamaJPP) is published twice a year in May and October. Each issue consists of 8 articles.
Open Access Policy
This journal adhere to the best practice and high publishing standards and comply with the following conditions:
- Provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge;
- Deposits content with a long term digital preservation or archiving program;
- Uses DOIs as permanent identifiers;
- Can Provide Provide article level metadata for any indexers and aggregators;
- Allows generous reuse and mixing of content, in accordance with CC BY-SA license;
Plagiarism screening will be conducted using Turnitin online plagiarism detection software. If the screening finds similarity index up to 20% or more, the author should rewrite the entire manuscript. The editor has the right to reject and replace the manuscript if the author does not abide with the regulation within a given time limit (a month) after the manuscript has been returned for revising.
Article Processing Charges
Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology (GamaJPP) does not charge a publication fee for authors. All articles published in our journals are open access and freely available online, immediately upon publication.
This journal utilizes the Indonesia One Search (IOS), Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD), and Indonesian Publication Index (IPI) system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives All articles published in our journals are open access and freely available online, immediately upon publication. of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.
Conflict of Interest
Gadjah Mada Journal of Professional Psychology (GamaJPP) respects requests not to have the manuscripts peer-reviewed by those experts who may have a competing interest with the author(s) of a submitted manuscript. It is not possible for Editors to be aware of all competing interests; we therefore expect that reviewers would inform the Editor-in-Chief if they notice any potential competing interest during the course of review of a manuscript. Moreover, the reviewers are expected to inform the Editors or editorial office of the journal if they have a conflict of interest in carrying out a review of a manuscript submitted by any author/contributor of the manuscript.
Double blind peer review
- This means that the reviewers of the paper won’t get to know the identity of the author(s), and the author(s) won’t get to know the identity of the reviewer. The idea is that everyone should get a similar and unbiased review.
- Remove any identifying information, including author names, from file names and ensure document properties are also anonymized.