Strategi Belajar Kognitif Sebagai Mediator Peran Motivasi Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar

Asmadi Alsa; Adi Putra Hidayatullah; Agustina Hardianti

doi:10.22146/gamajop.62623

Strategi Belajar Kognitif Sebagai Mediator Peran Motivasi Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar

Asmadi Alsa, Adi Putra Hidayatullah, Agustina Hardianti

(Submitted 28 December 2020)

(Published 28 May 2021)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji peran motivasi belajar intrinsik terhadap prestasi belajar statistika dengan mediator strategi belajar kognitif. Subjek penelitian 179 mahasiswa kelas statistika Fakultas Psikologi dari tiga universitas di Yogyakarta. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan untuk mengukur variabel motivasi belajar intrinsik, strategi belajar rehearsal, strategi belajar elaborasi, dan strategi belajar organisasi adalah skala; sedangkan variabel prestasi belajar statistika diperoleh dari dokumentasi tes hasil belajar tengah semester (UTS) dan akhir semester (UAS). Data yang diperoleh, dianalisis dengan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) menggunakan perangkat lunak Analysis of Moment Stucture (AMOS). Hasil penelitian adalah: 1) Model teoretis yang menyatakan bahwa strategi belajar kognitif memediasi peran motivasi belajar intrinsik terhadap prestasi belajar statistika, cocok atau sesuai dengan data; 2) Variabel motivasi belajar intrinsik, strategi belajar rehearsal, dan strategi belajar organisasi berperan positif terhadap prestasi belajar statistika, sedangkan strategi belajar elaborasi tidak berperan terhadap prestasi belajar statistika; 3) Strategi belajar kognitif, yang meliputi strategi belajar rehearsal, strategi belajar elaborasi, dan strategi belajar organisasi, tidak berfungsi sebagai mediator atas peran motivasi belajar intrinsik terhadap prestasi belajar statistika.

Keywords

motivasi belajar; strategi belajar kognitif; prestasi belajar

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajop.62623

References

Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students' science achievement. Journal Educational Research and Evaluation An International Journal on Theory and Practice. 16(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611003672348

Amrai, K., Motlagh, S. E., Zalani, H. A., & Parhon, H. (2011). The relationship between academic motivation and academic achievement students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 399–402.

Anais, M. J., Hojas, A. M., Bustos, A., Letelier. C., Zuzulich, M. S., Cabieses, B., & Zubiaguirre, M. (2012). Motivational and cognitive learning strategies used by first-year engineering undergraduate students at Universidad Católica in Chile, 3, Special Issue, 811-817. Published Online October 2012 in SciRes (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ce)

Bandalos, D .L., Finney, S. A., & Geske, J. A. (2003). A model of statistics performance based on achievement goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 604-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.604

Chin, C. & Chin, L. (2009). Cognitive strategies. (http://www.education.com/reference/ article/cognitive-strategies/)

Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary school students’ motivation and achievement in combined science. US-China Education Review B, 3(4), 213-228

Chung, Mi-Kyung. (2000). The development of self-regulated learning. Asia Pacific Education Review. 1, 55-66. (http://www.aped.snu.ac.kr/prof/ aper/aper%20data/1-106-Mi Kyung%20Chung.pdf)

De Boer, H., Donker-Bergstra, A. S. & Kostons, D. D. N. M. (2012). Effective strategies for self- regulated learning: A meta-analysis. Gronings Instituut voor Onderzoek van Onderwijs, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. (https://www.nro.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PROO_ Effective+ strategies+for+self-regulated+learning.pdf

Lee, In-Sook. (2002). Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within

Korea’s University Context. International Review, ETR & D, 50(1), 101-102.

Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching; 9(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Muhammad, A. S., Bakar, N. A., Mijinyawa, S. I., & Halabi, K. A. (2013). Impact of motivation students’ academic performance: A case study of University Sultan Zainal Abidin Students. The American Journal of Innovative Research and Applied Sciences. (www.american-jiras.com).

Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2012). Predicting long-term growth in students mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 1–16. http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Murayama-et-al_2012_CD.pdf.

Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology: developing learners, 4^th edition. Merrill Prentice Hall.

Parson, R. D., Hinson, S. L., & Sardo-Brown, D.(2001). Educational psychology. Apractitioner-researcer model of teaching. Thomson Learning, Inc.

Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Ruffing, S., F., Wach, S., Spinath, F. M., Brünken, R., & Karbach, J. (2013).Learning strategies and general cognitive ability as predictors of gender- specific academic achievement. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541601/)

Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. (Dalam Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report #23, pp. 313–359).

Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational Psychology. Third edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Tinajero, C., Lemos, S. M., Araújo, M., Ferraces, M. J., Páramo, M. F. (2015). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of brazilian university students. Psicol. Reflex. Crit. 25(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000100013

Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224

Wolters, C.A., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. Paper prepared for the conference on indicators of positive development. Sponsored by Child Trends, National Intitutes of Health. www.childtrends.com/meeting schedule /pdf/woltersfinal.pdf

Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 82, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.