Modifikasi Skala Mindfulness

Flaviana Rinta Ferdian, Avin Fadilla Helmi
(Submitted 31 July 2020)
(Published 31 October 2023)

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan modifikasi terhadap skala mindfulness. Peneliti mengggunakan empat aspek mindfulness dan indikator diperoleh dari lapangan melalui open-ended questionaire dan wawancara. Adapun empat aspek tersebut adalah observasi, deskripsi, bertindak dengan kesadaran, serta menerima tanpa menilai pada stimulus internal dan eksternal. Partisipan pada penelitian ini berjumlah 201 orang mahasiswa S1, S2, dan mahasiswa profesi. Skala disebarkan kepada partisipan secara online dan offline. Seleksi item dilakukan dengan menggunakan hasil pengujian validitas isi, analisis daya beda, dan analisis faktor konfirmatori. Dari 48 item tersisa 13 item sebagai skala mindfulness. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga aspek yang muncul dalam penelitian ini, sedangkan aspek bertindak dengan kesadaran tidak muncul sebagai dimensi spesifik dalam analisis. Oleh karena itu, penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai aspek tersebut atau perbaikan dalam pembuatan item skala mindfulness perlu untuk dilakukan. Walaupun memiliki keterbatasan, penelitian ini berkontribusi untuk menyediakan item pada aspek deskripsi dan menerima tanpa menilai yang mencerminkan stimulus internal dan stimulus eksternal, yang pada penelitian sebelumnya, banyak item stimulus eksternal yang gugur pada dua aspek tersebut. Oleh karena itu, skala modifikasi mindfulness ini dapat melihat mindfulness pada individu baik terhadap stimulus internal maupun stimulus eksternal.

Keywords


asesmen self-report; karakteristik psikometrik; mindfulness; penyusunan skala

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajop.58311

References


Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings: Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Azwar, S. (2015). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107313003

Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditationbased psychotherapy: The development of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, . /paper/Measuring-mindfulness-in-insight-meditation-and-The-Buchheld-Grossman/0267d02fe7566d97a0313382001616df305b60f9

Chizanah, L., & Hadjam, M. N. R. (2011). Validitas konstruk ikhlas: Analisis faktor eksploratori terhadap instrumen skala ikhlas. Jurnal Psikologi, 38(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.7653

Creswell, J. D. (2017). Mindfulness interventions. Annual review of psychology, 68(1), 491-516.

Dimidjian, S., & Linehan, M. M. (2003). Defining an agenda for future research on the clinical application of mindfulness practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg019

Didonna, F. (2009). Clinical handbook of mindfulness. Springer.

Frank, J. L., Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2016). Validation of the mindfulness in teaching scale. Mindfulness, 7(1), 155-163.

Grossman, P. (2019). On the porosity of subject and object in ‘mindfulness’ scientific study: Challenges to ‘scientific’construction, operationalization and measurement of mindfulness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 102-107.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (Eighth). Cengage Learning EMEA.

Holas, P., & Jankowski, T. (2013). A cognitive perspective on mindfulness. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 232-243.

Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2004). SPSS Explained (1 edition). Routledge.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life (10 edition). Hachette Books.

Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020). Education and cognitive functioning across the life span. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(1), 6-41.

Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., & Kohls, N. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art. Mindfulness, 4(1), 3-17.

Smith, G. T., Fischer, S., & Fister, S. M. (2003). Incremental validity principles in test construction. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.467

Thompson, M., & Gauntlett-Gilbert, J. (2008). Mindfulness with children and adolescents: Effective clinical application. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13(3), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104508090603

Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The, 25(4), 40-48.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.