Tiga Dekade Buletin Psikologi (1993-2023): Beberapa Statistik Penting

Muhammad Dwirifqi Kharisma Putra; Faturochman Faturochman; Arif Budiman Al Fariz; Novina Sabila Zahra; Netti Ermawati

doi:10.22146/buletinpsikologi.96346

Tiga Dekade Buletin Psikologi (1993-2023): Beberapa Statistik Penting

Muhammad Dwirifqi Kharisma Putra, Faturochman Faturochman, Arif Budiman Al Fariz, Novina Sabila Zahra, Netti Ermawati

(Submitted 21 May 2024)

(Published 28 June 2024)

Abstract

Artikel ini berisi laporan deskriptif tentang penerbitan Buletin Psikologi tahun 1993-2023. Informasi deskriptif yang dimaksud merupakan statistik artikel terpublikasi, penulis, referensi, jumlah penggunaan referensi berbahasa asing, serta sitasi. Informasi lainnya seperti perubahan format terbitan Buletin Psikologi turut dilaporkan. Hasil analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 320 artikel yang telah dipublikasikan dalam Buletin Psikologi, 54 diantaranya (16.83%) terbit dalam Bahasa Inggris. Rerata jumlah halaman terbitan adalah 12 halaman per artikel dan rata-rata jumlah sitasi sebesar 28,453. Temuan studi ini menjadi informasi penting berupa journal metrics Buletin Psikologi. Dengan demikian, studi ini merupakan fondasi yang dapat dilanjutkan pada masa mendatang seiring bertambahnya data terbitan pada volume dan edisi selanjutnya.

Keywords

buletin psikologi; jurnal; review; metrik jurnal; statistik deskriptif

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.96346

References

An, W., & Bauldry, S. (2023). Methodological advances in quantitative social science: In celebration of the Social Science Research 50th anniversary. Social Science Research, 110, 102843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102843

Barroga, E. F. (2014). Reference accuracy: Authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 29(12), 1587-1589. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1587

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2019). A brief history of modern psychology (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Bookstein, A., & Yitzhaki, M. (1999). Own-language preference: A new measure of “relative language self-citation”. Scientometrics, 46, 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464782

Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2016). The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2778-2789. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23627

Buntinx, N. (2023). Language preference in citations: a quantitative analysis of MA theses at a French-speaking university. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(3), 786-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1915318

Dai, C., Chen, Q., Wan, T., Liu, F., Gong, Y., & Wang, Q. (2021). Literary runaway: Increasingly more references cited per academic research article from 1980 to 2019. PLoS ONE, 16(8): e0255849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255849

Daud, A., Hayat, M. K., Alshdadi, A. A., Banjar, A., & Alharbi, W. M. (2022). Measuring the impact of co-author count on citation count of research publications. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 16(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.2016356

Divecha, C. A., Tullu, M. S., & Karande, S. (2023). The art of referencing: Well begun is half done! Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 69(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjpgm.jpgm_908_22

Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros, M. N. (2013). The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of General Medicine Journals. PLoS ONE, 8(2): e49476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049476

Fernberger, S. W. (1932). The American Psychological Association: a historical summary, 1892-1930. Psychological Bulletin, 29(1), 1–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075733

Fox, C. W., Paine, C. E. T., & Sauterey, B. (2016). Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals. Ecology and Evolution, 6(21), 7717-7726. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2505

Habibzadeh, F., & Yadollahie, M. (2010). Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? Cross-sectional study of 22 scientific journals. Croatian Medical Journal, 51(2), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.3325%2Fcmj.2010.51.165

Harlow, L. (2017). The making of Psychological Methods. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000141

Irianti, P. (2015a). Pemanfaatan informasi dalam artikel ilmiah: Kajian analisis sitiran pada Buletin Psikologi UGM. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 36(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v36i2.209

Irianti, P. (2015b). Keterlibatan penulis dalam artikel pada “Buletin Psikologi” Universitas Gadjah Mada. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 11(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.8837

Jarwal, S. D., Brion, A. M., & King, M. L. (2009). Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’: blunt instruments or inspired metrics? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(4), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800903191930

Jasso, G. (2022). Notes on the history of Social Science Research: In celebration of its 50th anniversary. Social Science Research, 108, 102780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102780

Kozak, M. (2020). Historical development of tourism journals – a milestone in 75 years: a perspective article. Tourism Review, 75(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2019-0080

Logan, S. W., Hussong-Christian, U., Case, L., & Noregaard, S. (2024). Reference accuracy of primary studies about reference accuracy: A descriptive study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100062312244

Lovaglia, M. J. (1991). Predicting citations to journal articles: The ideal number of references. The American Sociologist, 22(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691867

Mammola, S., Fontaneto, D., Martinez, A., & Chichorro, F. (2021). Impact of the reference list features on the number of citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 785-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03759-0

Marx, W., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references—a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 109, 1397-1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2111-2

Nigro, O., Johansson, J., & Hansson, S. H. (2022). Insight into what they cite: a citation analysis of publications at the School of Business, Economics and Law at the University of Gothenburg. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 27(2), 127-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2022.2044614

Singer, S. (2023). Development of three psychology sub-disciplines over the past 30 years: A citation analysis. Review of General Psychology, 27(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680221133785

Ukwoma, S. C., & Ngulube, P. (2022). Research productivity and the citation of Open and Distance Learning Journals (2009-2018): A citation analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 36(3), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.1928432

Wicker, P., Scharfenkamp, K., & Lesch, L. (2022). Publication and citation analysis of articles published in the European Journal for Sport and Society, 2004–2020. European Journal for Sport and Society, 19(4), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2022.2133412

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.