Kritik terhadap Penggunaan IQ dalam Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar Spesifik

Satrio Budi Wibowo, Saifuddin Azwar, Maria Goretti Adiyanti, Supra Wimbarti
(Submitted 11 February 2019)
(Published 22 June 2020)


Kesulitan belajar spesifik sering didefinisikan sebagai pencapaian rendah yang tidak terduga. Berdasarkan konsep mengenai pencapaian rendah yang tidak terduga, model kesenjangan digunakan dalam upaya mendiagnosis kesulitan belajar spesifik. Menurut model kesenjangan, diagnosis kesulitan belajar spesifik dapat ditegakkan setelah ditemukan adanya perbedaan antara IQ dan prestasi. Namun, dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, para peneliti mempertanyakan validitas model kesenjangan dalam mendiagnosis SLD. Beberapa penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan IQ dalam mendiagnosis SLD tidak diperlukan. Jadi kriteria diagnostik SLD dalam beberapa pedoman internasional direvisi. Salah satu manual diagnostik yang direvisi adalah Manual Diagnostik dan Statistik Gangguan Mental (DSM). Kriteria dan diagnosis tentang kesulitan belajar spesifik telah berubah, di mana model kesenjangan tidak digunakan. Makalah ini berupaya menjelaskan berbagai argumen yang mematahkan konsep model kesenjangan, sehingga penggunaan tes kecerdasan tidak lagi diperlukan dalam menegakkan diagnosis kesulitan belajar spesifik.


diagnosis; IQ; kesulitan belajar spesifik; model kesenjangan

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.43518


American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. In American Psychiatric Organization, 33.

Bateman, B. (1965). An educational view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders. Learning Disorders, 1, 219–220.

Bradley, L., & Vellutino, F. R. (2006). Dyslexia: Theory and research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 29(1), 95. doi: 10.2307/3120437

D’Angiulli, A., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Cognitive functioning as measured by the WISC-R: Do children with learning disabilities have distinctive patterns of performance? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360010601

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2018). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read : Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. American Educational Research Association Stable Systematic Phonics Instructi. 71(3), 393–447.

Fletcher, J. M. (2012). Classification and identification of learning disabilities. In Learning about learning disabilities (Fourth Ed). doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-388409-1.00001-1

Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C., & Francis, D. J. (2005). For the identification of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 545–552. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380061101

Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(2), 98–108. doi: 10.1177/00222194050 380020101

Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and Shouldn’t be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 129–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826. 2007.00237.x

Hallahan, D. P., & Mercer, C. D. (2002). Learning disabilities: Historical pers­pectives. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice, 1-67. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H. L. (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review, 29, 102–119.

Kavale, K. A. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 553–562. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380061201

Kirk, S. A. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Maehler, C., & Schuchardt, K. (2009). Working memory functioning in children with learning disabilities: Does intelligence make a difference? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(1), 3–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01105.x

Monroe, M. (1932). Children who cannot read. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Morris, R. D. (1988). Classification of learning disabilities: Old problems and new approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 789–794. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.789

Rourke, B. P., & Finlayson, M. A. J. (1978). Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6(1), 121–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00915788

Schulte-Körne, G., Deimel, W., Müller, K., Gutenbrunner, C., & Remschmidt, H. (1996). Familial aggregation of spelling disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 37(7), 817–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01477.x

Shaywitz, S., Colker, R., Shaywitz, B., & Simon, J. A. (2012). Comments on proposed DSM-5 criteria for specific learning disorder from a legal and medical/scientific perspective Professor Ruth Colker, JD Distinguished University Professor Heck-Faust Memorial Chair in Constitutional Law. Diunduh dari

Shaywitz, S. E., Morris, R., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 451–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633

Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(10), 618–629. doi: 10.1177/0022219 49202501001

Siegel, L. S, & Feldman, W. (1983). Non-dyslexic children with combined writing and arithmetic difficulties. Clinical Pediatrics, 22, 241–244.

Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(8), 469. doi: 10.1177/0143034305055975

Siegel, L. S. (2003). The diagnosis of LD: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 2–3.

Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (2018). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60(4), 973–980. doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb03528.x

Stanovich, K. E. (2008). The future of a mistake: Will discrepancy measure­ment continue to make the learning disabilities field a pseudoscience? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 103. doi: 10.2307/1593604

Stuebing, K. K., Barth, A. E., Molfese, P. J., Weiss, B., & Fletcher, J. M. (2009). IQ is not strongly related to response to reading instruction: A meta-analytic interpretation. Council for Exceptional Children, 76(1), 31–51.

Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., LeDoux, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 469–518. doi: 10.3102/00028312039002469

Tanaka, H., Black, J. M., Hulme, C., Stanley, L. M., Kesler, S. R., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., … Hoeft, F. (2011). The brain basis of the phonological deficit in dyslexia is independent of IQ. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1442–1451. doi: 10.1177/0956797611419521

Tannock, R. (2014). DSM-5 Changes in diagnostic criteria for Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD). Diunduh dari

Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137–146. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00070

Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily more evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 223–238. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300302

Wagner, R. F. (1973). Rudolf Berlin: Originator of the term dyslexia. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 23(1), 57–63. doi: 10.1007/bf02653841

Zumeta, R. O., Zirkel, P. A., & Danielson, L. (2014). Identifying specific learning disabilities: Legislation, regulation, and court decisions. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(1), 8–24. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000006


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Buletin Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.