Aplikasi IRT dalam Analisis Aitem Tes Kognitif

Firmanto Adi Nurcahyo

Abstract


Item Response Theory (IRT) was developed to overcome the problems in Classical Test Theory (CTT). Item analysis using IRT is based on the parameters used which are item difficulty, item discrimination, and pseudo-chance level. This paper aims to provide an overview of how IRT isused to perform item analysis on cognitive tests. Simulation data of seven items with 900 subjects were used . IRT analysis was performed with R Program based on one, two, and three-parameter logistic model. The results were then discussed

Keywords


item analysis; item difficulty; Item Response Theory

References


Azwar, S , & Ridho, A. (2013). Abilitas Komposit pada Tes Potensi. Jurnal Psikologi, 40( 2), 127-142.

Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London: SAGE.

Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory, Principles and Applications. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Molenaar, I.W. (1995). Some Background for Item Response Theory and the Rasch Model. G.H. Fischer, & I. W. Molenaar (Eds). Rasch Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Ridho, A. (2007). Karakteristik Psikometrik Tes Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori Tes Klasik dan Teori Respon Aitem. Jurnal Psikologi INSAN, 2( 2), 1-27.

Sumintono, B, & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R.K, & Rogers, H.J. (2007). Assessing the fit of Item Response Models. Handbook of Statistics, 26, 683-718.

Veerkamp, W.J. & Berger, M.P. (1999). Optimal Item Discrimination and Maximum Information for Logistic IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 31-40.

Wiberg, M. (2004). Classical test theory vs. Item response theory. Umea, 10(5), 1–27.

Widhiarso, W. (2016). Eksplorasi Gaya Respons Ekstrem dalam Mengisi Kuisioner. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(1), 16-29.


Full Text: Uncorrected Proof PDF

DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Buletin Psikologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.