Aplikasi IRT dalam Analisis Aitem Tes Kognitif
Abstract
Keywords
DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25218
References
Azwar, S , & Ridho, A. (2013). Abilitas Komposit pada Tes Potensi. Jurnal Psikologi, 40( 2), 127-142.
Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London: SAGE.
Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory, Principles and Applications. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Molenaar, I.W. (1995). Some Background for Item Response Theory and the Rasch Model. G.H. Fischer, & I. W. Molenaar (Eds). Rasch Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ridho, A. (2007). Karakteristik Psikometrik Tes Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori Tes Klasik dan Teori Respon Aitem. Jurnal Psikologi INSAN, 2( 2), 1-27.
Sumintono, B, & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Swaminathan, H., Hambleton, R.K, & Rogers, H.J. (2007). Assessing the fit of Item Response Models. Handbook of Statistics, 26, 683-718.
Veerkamp, W.J. & Berger, M.P. (1999). Optimal Item Discrimination and Maximum Information for Logistic IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 31-40.
Wiberg, M. (2004). Classical test theory vs. Item response theory. Umea, 10(5), 1–27.
Widhiarso, W. (2016). Eksplorasi Gaya Respons Ekstrem dalam Mengisi Kuisioner. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(1), 16-29.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Buletin Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.