Validation test of Indonesian pelvic floor distress inventory-20 (Indonesian PFDI-20)

https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedSci005202202004

Nuring Pangastuti(1*), Budi Iman Santoso(2), Denny Agustiningsih(3), Ova Emilia(4)

(1) Departemen Obstetri Ginekologi Fakultas Kedokteran Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Keperawatan, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
(2) Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Dr Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The pelvic floor distress inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire is one of the questionnaires used to help find out complaints of pelvic floor dysfunction. The questionnaire is also frequently used in studies related to pelvic floor dysfunction. The validation test results of the questionnaire have not been obtained from Indonesian population.This study aimed to obtain an Indonesian PFDI-20 questionnaire that is in accordance with the original questionnaire and valid as well as reliable use for the Indonesian population.The validation test series were conducted through several stages: forward translation, back-translation, expert panel, pre-testing, and cognitive interviewing, final version and documentation. Data of 77 female respondents of reproductive age in the Yogyakarta Special Region were collected from January to March 2018.The statistical test result of questionnaire validity from the corrected item-total correlation of each question item has value more than 0.30 (0.385-0.781) indicating that the Indonesian PFDI-20 questionnaire was valid. Test reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach’s alpha with a high significant result of 0.911 (0.902-0.913)> r table was obtained. In conclusion, the Indonesian PFDI-20 questionnaire is valid and reliable, thereforeit can be used in Indonesian population.


Keywords


Validation test; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20; Indonesia; Pupulation;

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Sahin L. Pelvic floor dysfunction and effects of pregnancy and mode of delivery on pelvic floor. J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 53:452-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2014.08.001
  2. Memon HU, Handa VL. Vaginal childbirth and pelvic floor disorders. Womens Health 2013; 9:265-77. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.13.17.
  3. Kaplan PB, Sut N, Sut HK. Validation, cultural adaptation and responsiveness of two pelvic-floor-specific quality-of-life questionnaires, PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7, in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162:229-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.004
  4. Utomo E, Blok BF, Steensma AB, Korfage IJ. Validation of the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI-20) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ-7) in a Dutch population. Int Urogynecology J2014; 25:531-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2263-z
  5. Hee Yoo E, Jae Jeon M, Hoon Ahn K, Wook Bai S. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of short form of pelvic floor distress inventory-20, pelvic floor impact questionnaire-7. Obstet Gynecol Sci2013; 56(5):330-2. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2013.56.5.330
  6. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:103-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025
  7. Chen Y, Johnson B, Li F, King WC, Connell KA, Guess MK. The effect of body mass index on pelvic floor support 1 year postpartum. Reprod Sci 2016; 23(2):234-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115602769
  8. Memon HU, Handa VL. Pelvic floor disorders following vaginal or cesarean delivery: Curr. Opin. Obstet Gynecol2012; 24:349-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e328357628b
  9. Choi KH, Hong JY. Management of pelvic organ prolapse.Korean J Urol 2014; 55(11):693-702. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.11.693
  10. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q)-a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J. Med. Life 2011; 4:75-81.
  11. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29:213-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20870
  12. Segal S, Arya LA, Smith AL. Functional outcomes for incontinence and prolapse surgery. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep2012; 7:179-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-012-0136-9
  13. Swift S. Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence, in: Ostergard’s urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008. pp. 27-38.
  14. Sultan AH, Thakar R, Fenner DE. Perineal and anal sphincter trauma diagnosis and clinical management. London: Springer- Verlag. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-503-5
  15. Siswanto, Susila, Suyanto. Metodologi penelitian kesehatan dan kedokteran, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Bursa Ilmu, 2014.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.19106/JMedSci005202202004

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3399 | views : 2803


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2020 Nuring Pangastuti, Santoso Budi Iman, Agustiningsih Denny, Ova Emilia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.